Feedback talk:User

So is this our sort of wish list? Or just a place to bitch at ANet for their wonderfully wonderful job? Moo Kitty 14:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:User_Vanguard_Feedback.png
 * Like Vanguard said, that. It's theorically for people to tell Arena Net what they want to be done for GW (1 and 2), ideally with more details than just "OMFG, balance the game already!!!!!". In practice, I expect some bitching, although I would expect it to get worse in a few months. Erasculio  14:45, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok, so some suggestions have a gray x with a "no" tooltip. I don't see anything in the FAQ about this. They seemed to have been added by Sysops and such. If they were added by developers, I would assume that it means they've read the suggestion and have denied it. What exactly does it mean? Will I be able to find out why making tickets won/lost toggle-able is frowned upon by a sysop? Manifold 19:38, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No, it's just indicating that the most recent edit was done by someone other than the owner. (mostly just minor maintenance edits). By placing a / in the middle of the suggestion title you are creating a subpage link, since / indicates a subpage. It was simply removed to make your suggestion actually work correctly in the wiki mechanics, not something specific about your idea. -- Wyn [[Image:User Wynthyst sig icon2.png|19px ]] talk  19:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you. Sorry if I overreacted. Manifold 20:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Not at all, it was an honest question. I'm sorry the change to your page wasn't more directly explained to you earlier. -- Wyn [[Image:User Wynthyst sig icon2.png|19px ]] talk  20:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Slashes are possible, and now those suggestions are also displayed in all lists correctly. poke | talk 20:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sorry about that - I evidently forgot to explain it on your talk page. I only moved it because it wasn't displaying properly in the list due to the slash at that time. I didn't realise it was a problem with the list itself. -- [[Image:User Brains12 circle sig.png|19px|]] Brains12 \ talk 20:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Load time
With all 3 tables on one page, the load time was getting a bit much, so I split them onto separate pages. -- Wyn  talk  16:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I was wondering why the wiki seemed slow. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 16:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Hueg paeg is hueg. Can we cut it down to the past three days? -- Armond Warblade 05:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This is not what was slowing the wiki down, that was the Aion open beta that started on Sunday. And I think 7 days is fine, considering how often the devs may/may not be looking at this. -- Wyn [[Image:User Wynthyst sig icon2.png|19px ]] talk  05:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I mentioned it because I just clicked over to the page and back to the talk two or three times in succession and it took longer than I expected it would. However, the dev point is a good one, so I'll live with it. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 05:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It is not a recent changes-like page to monitor new suggestions. For those who want that and will actualize it often, recent changes offers a nice way to filter namespaces, and given how that is implemented in the background it should be used for that. These lists however are part of the main starting points for the developers, because there are just too many individual lists to check for new additions and you can quickly see which you have read and which not. As such we shouldn't limit the lists. poke | talk 15:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Consideration
How do we know if Anet have taken the idea into consideration, or if they have even read our suggestion? I wouldn't expect them to write a lengthly comment about pros and cons, as I think asking its players what they think is enough on its own; but It's nice to know someone out there has heard your idea :) Chibot2000 14:11, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Feedback:FAQ --JonTheMon 14:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)