User talk:Auron/Archive 12

'''This is an archive of my talk page from February 4th, 2009 to April 20th, 2009. Please don't edit it; leave comments and messages on my talk page.'''

@ screenshot
How do you know they're unranked, and where are the heroes? I only see Norgu, no others. 145.94.74.23 08:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If you check the positions on the compass, look at where the 8th blue dot (the one not in the screenshot) is. That's either a hero or a terrible player.  Though I can't answer how he knows whether or not they're unranked (unless that last dot isn't a hero, in which case, lol).  [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]]  Raine   - talk  08:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * We knew one person on the other team (the raining fame guildie) who got a bunch of randoms + heroes and hit "enter" because he was hugely bored. The team, without vent, stomped other teams all the way to golden gates and then stomped us, a high ranked group using vent and no heroes. - Auron 08:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Moral of the story, it never pays to be "honourable" when going up against overpowered shit like tease/smite heros. Pika Fan 09:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Generally it does. We usually hold halls for 4-5 hours at night, beating 1v1 euro randomways all night. We swapped out backline (we usually have yang), so we're trying to get back into the grove - but we shouldn't ever be beaten by teams carried entirely by their heroes. - Auron 09:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hero randomway is strong. Misery  09:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * ^upsPika Fan 09:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hero randomway needs to be removed from the game <-- fixed - Auron 09:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Those guys werent unranked, it's an r9+ group hence the tags. Super is r10 and the other guys are r9+. Maybe i missed out on an r8212.87.108.27
 * Oh so the guildie is lying? Yeah ok. They were bad euros and you know it. - Auron 05:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Super as in the terrible rspike/sfspiker? --77.86.114.214 22:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Super is strong, he was beaten by a PvX pug in HA last night. Wait, does that mean a PvX pug beat a group Auron couldn't beat? That would make me laugh. Misery  22:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure LoL are terrible and Super is in LoL, therefore Crow can beat him anyway ;o --77.86.114.214 22:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

ID
I thought it to be an excellent tactical maneuver, and euros are pretty mad they didn't think of it first. &mdash;  Skakid 
 * Guild Wars isn't chess. ANet at least had the sense to realize that 28 minute conga lines were against the rules. - Auron 22:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * they say they only conga'd for the last 3 minutes though. 98.199.243.39 00:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Forum Post
You actually believe that it got removed because of what you said, and not because of the way you said it? 145.94.74.23 23:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * "Let's censor based on diction rather than content!"
 * I'm not saying that they didn't censor based on diction rather than content, but, uh... [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]]  Raine   - talk  00:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

I never thought I'd say this, but I completely agree with what Auron wrote. The "diction" is simply a representation how much ANet has pissed off people with this slap-on-the-wrist. King Neoterikos 00:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah bro, I totally agree bro. Misery  00:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Who knew the effects of my trolling would go cross-wiki? You got served. And I wasn't kidding, I agree with Auron on this 100%. King Neoterikos 02:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ups. I wasn't logged in.  I'm not an IP, my above comment is more important now.  [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]]  Raine   - talk  00:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Didn't you tell me there was a "Guild Wars IQ test" to make accounts on Guru or something? I read the entire thread thus far, and think the test ought to be updated a bit. Vili 03:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If there was a GW IQ test to join, guru wouldn't have that many members. ~Shard  [[Image:User Shard Sig Icon.png]] 04:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * He who swears to get a point across is running out of arguments. I can't say I don't agree with Auron, but because of posts like that one, I am leaning more and more towards Anet. 145.94.74.23 08:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The amount of problems remain the same, so naturally Auron would run out of arguments unless if he wanted to make himself sound like a broken recorder. Maybe you should exercise a bit of logic before posting.<---This is one of the reasons Auron is pulling his hair out for-lack of common sense.Pika Fan 09:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, so should you, for Auron sounds like a broken recorder too if he swears all the time. I haven't seen any original anti-Anet rants in months. 145.94.74.23 12:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I haven't seen any original anti-Anet rants in months. <---Thanks for supporting my argument about anet having the same problems, have a nice day.Pika Fan 12:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm actually surprised they already did something against it. Either way; you might be QQ'ing about rawr, but actually; the majority of the community doesn't care about it, the majority cares about tiebreaker(and if you actually did play guildwars, you'd know how much it would piss you off). Seriously; you don't even play guildwars, how would you care about it. Unexist 12:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * @Pika: when I mentioned originality, I meant the slight variations on: "fuck you Anet, you fail, now die plz". Nevertheless, the few rants that go deeper than that mention the same things again and again. Now, wheter you like it or not, Anet really has more information on the Guild Wars than we do. So maybe, just maybe, they know something you don't know, and they don't adress the issues because the players are wrong about something. And maybe, just maybe, players should stop encouraging eachother to hate Anet and try to see the good intentions that are no doubt behind all their efforts. I can tell you, that if I were an Anet employee, and I got bitched at by so many players, I'd already started removing HA ranks long ago. No person likes being adressed the way GW players consider standard 'conversation'. 145.94.74.23 13:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If they really did, broken things like heroes wouldn't have existed. Have a nice day.Pika Fan 17:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * @145. looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool. that is all. - Auron 19:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * no seriously, i haven't laughed so hard in weeks. thanks anon :) your humor rocks - Auron 19:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Auron, you are being a complete retard right now.

1) We can't delete every single stupid, uninformed post. That would mean we'd have only like 5% of the users left, which means not enough income to keep the server up and running.

2) We DO leave anti-ANet posts. Yours was deleted because of the language in it, you had the chance to repost it, without the language you used, but you didn't. That's your own fault, and to complain about it afterwards is stupid.

Yes, the punishment was retarded, and didn't do a single thing. This doesn't mean we're going to delete every single post that actually AGREES with the punishment.

Personally I would've left your post, but apparently Bill thought otherwise. Mini Me  19:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You're all bad mods with very few exceptions. It has been that way for over a year. Guru mods sucking isn't a recent event. - Auron 21:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, if the content was fine but the language wasn't, what happened to editing posts? Do mods not have that ability or have they simply forgotten to use it? Saying it was my fault that I didn't repost that bigass thing is stupid as hell, and honestly just supports my claim that you're all terrible at modding. Then again, the elite fellatio service for a bad creator of a dead game shouldn't have standards that are very high, so it's no big mystery. - Auron 21:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Why should the mods clean up your mess, when they can just as easily delete your posts? It's not as if people miss important information if they don't read it. 145.94.74.23 21:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * A full deletion is odd, seeing as how they've edited my posts numerous times before. I hate GWGuru. The pop ups, sold-outs, and banhappy mods (got kicked for 3 days once)... it's not a good forum.-- [[Image:User_Vanguard_VanguardLogo.png|19px]] anguard  21:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Why should the mods mod? Hm... good question. Why don't you ask them? - Auron 14:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Well then, if you do not like it, I suggest you stop visiting. Mini Me  [[Image:User Mini Me sig.png|19px|talk]] 23:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Or the forum can stop being fail. Works just as well.-- [[Image:User_Vanguard_VanguardLogo.png|19px]] anguard  23:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, thanks for the terrible logic bro. If you honestly can't see what is wrong with your suggestion... well, I rest my case. - Auron 14:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It was a joke, guy. Damn.-- [[Image:User_Vanguard_VanguardLogo.png|19px]] anguard  15:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Indents are usually used to show whom one is responding to, Vanguard. If you'll notice, I am using one more indent than you did, therefore it is implied that I am responing to you. I think you can take it from there. Vili [[Image:User Vili sig.jpg|User talk:Vili]] 15:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oo. I'm used to people just keep on indentin'.-- [[Image:User_Vanguard_VanguardLogo.png|19px]] anguard  15:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

jesus
l4d expert is hard. wtb those 4 hours of my life back :< - Auron 03:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * L4D is the stuff dude. Play more! >:U &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  03:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I was thinking about getting a few copies. On a scale of "1" to "OMG", how would you rate it?  [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]]  Raine   - talk  03:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * yes - Auron 03:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * about a OMFG! &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  03:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * So I'll buy it this weekend? [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]]  Raine   - talk  03:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Would be a good idea. &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  03:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * L4D is fun as hell. I like the achievements and how they came at a smooth pace, too. I need to play a few more rounds myself.-- [[Image:User_Vanguard_VanguardLogo.png|19px]] anguard  14:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Versus mode with friends/known rivals is quite fun. --[[Image:User PoA Sig.png|Talk]] Antioch 18:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Pub versus kind of sucks at the moment - it's still a fun game, but so many pubs will just hide in closets which makes playing infected really difficult. The recent infected buffs were aimed at balancing the playing field, but IMO, closets are still >>>> *. Maybe if they made smoker smoke do damage over time? Very little, so if you walked through it you'd take almost none, but if you were holed up in a closet you'd constantly lose health. - Auron 15:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Just bought the game today, holy crap is it freaking awesome. Too many times did I pack my dacks because a horde of zombies attacked b.r // talk  11:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * whats your steamid? we can play coop sometime - Auron 11:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * theonerellik. I just got it working a few minutes ago, was updating my drivers and then spent the rest of the afternoon fixing up my comp because some extra software boned my pc. Hoping to get a mic as well some time. I also hope not to play it at night, crap is it exhilarating b.r // talk  11:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I really wish I could play it on the PC (like all FPS should be), but my graphics card sucks. I can play it, but smoker smoke and fire slow me down almost to the point where the smoke would give me damage anyway. --[[Image:User PoA Sig.png|Talk]] Antioch 23:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

rawr
I'm a bit disconnected what did they do exactly? And the second link on your page comes up as an attack site. o.0 Invincible  Rogue  02:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * rawr and zero did a 28 minute conga line instead of fighting each other in a Monthly Tournament match. That violated the sportsmanship rule and the "gw is srs bzns" rule. Also rawr tried to defend it with retarded arguments like "since the tournament took place in 2009, 2008 rules don't apply." Which is ludicrous, but it's rawr, so ANet's going to defend them even if they break every rule in the book.
 * The second link is to a guru thread. Guru got spidered earlier for something, it'll be working by tomorrow. - Auron 02:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * A conga line... Wow... I've brought a team with droks run builds into GvG but I don't do formal GvG. XD Invincible  Rogue [[Image:User_Invincible Rogue_siggyiggywiggy.gif]] 02:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Why do you complain that you cannot tell the truth on Guild Wars Guru?
I saw your rant. But less obscene language next time please. Oh, and apparently, people aren't allowed to post the truth here either thanks to this. BTW, a friendly warning: Be careful of the advertisements on Guild Wars Guru. I tried clicking on your link to it and Firefox 3 blocked it as a "reported attack site". P.S. I'm not Shard. P.P.S. Quit blocking me as it doesn't work. P.P.P.S. In case you missed it, I'M NOT SHARD. Although I agree with Shard on many points. P.P.P.P.S. If you really hate Anet that much, why don't you join Shard's movement to declare Anet a bunch of failures?
 * Less English language next time? Oh okay. Also stop disrupting the wiki and you'll stop getting blocked. Ban evasion is legitimate reason for another block, so if you want it to end, all you have to do is stop posting until it wears off. - Auron 21:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * EC - because shard is a bad troll and lacks any semblance of tact. - Auron 21:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not trying to be disruptive.
 * Then stop posting? - Auron 21:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You may find this funny. Scroll down to the bottom: http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User_talk:Regina_Buenaobra/Journal
 * Note that my translations are different form Shard's. I do not use bad language, and anywhere that bad language could go, I place four dashes. Also I do not use obscene references or terms.
 * Actually, I don't. It sucks. You should stop trying to imitate everything shard does, because he's the only one that is remotely successful at that kind of humor. His little pack of parrots remind me of a bunch of kids running around following daddy, repeating everything he ever says without understanding it first.
 * Also, swear words are a vital part of the English language. I don't applaud you for censoring text - in fact, I'm concerned that you don't understand you're doing nothing more than mutilating the language you're trying to speak. - Auron 21:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I see that a member of the No-Cussing Club has invaded your talkpage, Auron. Should I contact 4chan? Vili [[Image:User Vili sig.jpg|User talk:Vili]] 21:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I don't think that will be necessary. 4chan is full of idiots, and IMO, it should be shut down. Oh, and Auron, it's rude to interrupt people when they're posting. More civilized discussion please.
 * Kougar? - Auron 21:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * IP, you're clogging up the RC, which makes stalking it harder. Just thought I'd point out that you're ruining my wiki experience. Karate  [[Image:User Karate Jesus sig.png]]  Jesus  22:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Someone is forgetting the 1st and 2nd. -- NUKLEAR  [[Image:User NuclearVII signature 3.jpg|19x19px]] IIV  14:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * As for his reference to me not allowing the truth to be posted here, I would like to say, I have no problem with truth being posted, but I will not allow anyone to break the NPA policy and outright attack ANYONE just because they see it as some personal truth. The fact that Shard (or anyone else) is angry with ArenaNet and the decisions they have made regarding GW does NOT give him the right to personally attack it's employees with insults. There are plenty of ways to express your displeasure/anger/disgust with the decisions without calling people retarded, brain dead, or telling them they have the IQ of a chair. Learn the difference between truth and opinion. --[[Image:User Wynthyst sig icon.png | Wyn's Talk page]] Wyn 14:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Private institution is private, Nuklear. Vili [[Image:User Vili sig.jpg|User talk:Vili]] 22:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * And you have the tact, don't you Auron. 98.226.112.109 23:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * whoru? - Auron 23:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Some anon who accused me of playing favorites with you. But he likes Signet of Capture and approved of the December update, so anything he says is automatically cast in doubt. Vili [[Image:User Vili sig.jpg|User talk:Vili]] 19:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I like signet of capture. It looks like, a chinese gong, which, well, goes    "GONGGGGGGGG"    , like, really nicely and if you do it loud enough people's ear's go     "RINGGGGGGGG"     for days.Pika Fan 06:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That text size just seems to lend a certain dignity and maturity to your argument. Lord Belar 06:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't believe I claimed to post with dignity or maturity. Thanks for assuming though.Pika Fan 06:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Lord Belar 06:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I will keep in mind.Pika Fan 06:34, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You stalking my edits now? Hey looks, I gots a new IP from my dynamic IP. 68.51.95.206 21:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Why the fuck are you still here
I want a good answer. They are not listening to you, hell, they don;t even know you exist, so they aren't even ignoring you. Why do you still waste your time writing here? Why the fuck do you still contribute to this shithole? Why, for crying out loud, do you still play GW? Why do you concern yourself with the balance of a game that doesn't effect you?

Don't give me the whole "I invested time and effort, not gonna let it go down" BS. You abandon a sinking ship instead of trying to drain the water aboard with a teaspoon. -- NUKLEAR   IIV  14:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * He doesn't play GW any more, he's playing WoW. Misery  14:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Why are you still here?
 * Also, learn to read please, I've answered this question before. - Auron 14:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * userpage is hawt--Relyk 12:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Help:ACCOUNT
If you want to hate ANet, go ahead, but please try not to scare anons. Sarcasm doesn't work on the internet, especially if people don't know you. &mdash; Why 17:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not scaring anyone. Come up with a single valid reason why ANet wouldn't add a sort feature to their game and I'll start telling people that instead. - Auron 18:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * They cbf. Seems to be a valid reason for you and I to not do a lot of things. Misery  18:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Something tells me OP would have a problem with me saying "ANet can't be fucked adding a sort feature to their own damn game." - Auron 18:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I wasn't discussing ANet. And yea, people would probably have a problem with you saying that on a help page. You could also try to rephrase your comment though, and everyone would be happy. Something like "no, I'm sorry, but there is no such thing as a manual sort function." &mdash; Why [[Image:User Why Are We Fighting BlackRose.PNG|User talk:Why Are We Fighting]] 19:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Or I could not, because it doesn't solve anything. If I asked that question and learned about the lack of a sort feature, my second question would be "why the fuck not? that's stupid as hell!" I simply saved him the trouble of asking.
 * If ANet didn't want me telling people about their half-assed game with half-assed functions and half-assed support, maybe they should have hired competent support people to begin with and users wouldn't have to answer questions on a wiki like this. I could understand asking wiki people about the game, but account questions? Those really should be all on ANet's plate. - Auron 19:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I cbf to rebutt your point. Misery  21:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't be fucked. Vili [[Image:User Vili sig.jpg|User talk:Vili]] 21:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * O rly. [[Image:User Aiiane-a.gif|Go to Aiiane's Talk page]] (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 21:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Virgins exist on the internet, they can only admit it if they claim to be girls too though. <font color="#DD0000">Misery  21:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If I was a city planner, I wouldn't build a playground next to a sewage plant. That is all.
 * Also, I would like to play Auron's part and say go away ppl, this topic is getting out of hand. :p Vili [[Image:User Vili sig.jpg|User talk:Vili]] 22:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If I was a city planner, I would build your house next to the sewage plant. That is all.
 * As a consolation, you would be beside the playground.Pika Fan 22:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

TF2 balancing
made of pure win. - <tt>Y0_ ich_halt </tt> 22:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * http://www.ubercharged.net/2009/02/11/if-valve-listened-to-the-steam-community-forums/#comment-17340 -- Dashface [[Image:User_Dashface.png]] 02:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Good satire of stupid players, IMO. --[[Image: User_Ezekial_Riddle_sig.jpg|19px|Talk]] Riddle 02:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * http://www.ubercharged.net/2009/02/11/if-valve-listened-to-the-steam-community-forums/#comment-17368 <- your average dumb player. - Auron 07:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

FFS
I reverted Noob once, and that was a month ago. What are you up to Auron? Backsword 14:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Dancing daggers. You pretended to participate in discussion by calling everyone else wrong, then you reverted again without listening to anyone or making changes to reflect consensus. - Auron 14:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Right.. Given how that makes your log summary a falsehood and your obvious bias, I don't expect you not to know, but here goes:


 * Blocked users inserting false information in articles are excempt from 1RR. Twice. Backsword 14:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The block reason is "violation of 1RR: discuss and make changes that reflect consensus, don't blow everyone off and pretend like you listened." You reverted three times. Consensus on the talk page wasn't anything like reached, yet you kept reverting the note. I know you think you're above the rules, but here in reality you get blocked for breaking them.
 * Not that it has the least bit of bearing on your case, but I might add the anon got blocked for breaking the rules too. - Auron 14:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I think you have me confused with yourself, since you obviously didn't bother to read either what I wrote nor the policy you're prentending to enforce. Backsword 14:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The part that says you aren't allowed to revert more than once? I got stuck on that bit, since that's the part you violated. It obviously wasn't vandalism, as evidenced by the talk page discussion, so the whole "you can break this policy to revert vandalism" thing doesn't apply to you. - Auron 14:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Fun. You're not even pretending to uniformity or not directing it at me. Backsword 14:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * What part of "don't violate policy or you get banned" are you not understanding? Is it the "don't?" - Auron 15:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You can't plead ignorance at this point so there's no room to AGF on your part. Equally, I wouldn't hope to persude you to abandon your agenda. So there is no point in continuing this. Backsword 15:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't plead ignorance of what? Please explain this to me since you seem to be making some huge logic leaps. Here is the situation from a third party's POV:
 * You and anon break 1RV policy.
 * You and anon get blocked for breaking policy
 * You whine about being blocked, yet you still haven't given a reason why you shouldn't have been blocked in the first place since you did, indeed, break policy
 * What part of this am I trying to plead ignorance to? - Auron 15:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Btw. Backsword, reverting someone because he violated 1RV can be a violation of 1RV, too. I saw you doing this some time ago. poke | talk 14:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Certainly, but that's not relevant. Backsword 14:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Give it up Backsword... you are the king of violating 1RR if you don't like something. I find your comments here to mtew really hilarious considering your revert tactics across this wiki. --[[Image:User Wynthyst sig icon.png | Wyn's Talk page]] Wyn 14:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

I love the smell of QQ in the morning. -- scourge   04:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

You seem like a nice guy Auron, will you learn me to HA?
<font color="#DD0000">Misery  14:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Bump. <font color="#DD0000">Misery  12:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Same. --[[Image:User PoA Sig.png|Talk]] Antioch 16:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I should point out that Auron knows I am being a douchebag so if you are serious you should probably start a new header. <font color="#DD0000">Misery  17:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I kinda got the idea. I doubt he would teach me anyway. :- / --[[Image:User PoA Sig.png|Talk]] Antioch 18:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, if you talk to Auron in private he is substantially less of a dick, but don't tell anyone I said that, it might ruin his rep. <font color="#DD0000">Misery  18:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speaking, or like PM'ing? --[[Image:User PoA Sig.png|Talk]] Antioch 18:59, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * MSN, in game PM, whatever. I've never actually vented with Auron, our timezones are pretty incompatible. <font color="#DD0000">Misery  19:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, he doesn't even play any more, so msn is a much better option ;o <font color="#DD0000">Misery  19:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Auron game across to me as less of a jerk, and more of just a little rough around the edges and unfavorable towards some people. &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  19:05, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * My advice for dealing with Auron is to not be retarded. He'll probably get on with you pretty well then. <font color="#DD0000">Misery  19:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * So, hypothetically, admitting I like smiting is not the way to go? XD I hope he won't see my naivety as retarded. --[[Image:User PoA Sig.png|Talk]] Antioch 19:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I like smiting in PvE from time to time XD There is a difference between just liking smites and often running them though, the later being much less favorable than the former for the most part. &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  19:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I want to get back into high end PvP though. I don't care too much if I lose, but what I do care about is learning and getting better. --[[Image:User PoA Sig.png|Talk]] Antioch 19:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Same, I've been out of that loop myself for the most part for quite some time, it requires a lot of re-adjusting and relearning in the ways of build and such :P &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  19:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I did a scrim last night and totally forgot about there being no locks. I think that's what kept me away for a while too. --[[Image:User PoA Sig.png|Talk]] Antioch 19:34, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I may be able to wiki while away from home and/or otherwise occupied, but not play too much Guild Wars unforunately :P &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  19:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

wtf - Auron 07:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * wtf --<font color="Black">Cursed Angel [[Image:User Cursed Angel Signature2.jpg|19px|Q.Q]] 12:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks like Antioch and I went off on a tad of a tangent there. &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  15:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * See Auron's Gimmicks. 68.51.95.206 15:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Dear Auron
tell all your gay wiki friends to stop being niggers <3 Metroid 05:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * i been doin that since like... 2007. - Auron 07:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sure not in quite those words, as they are an NPA violation, and an excesive amount of said violations would consitute Auron no longer being a Sysop. It also will result in quite the amount of ban time, considering Shard has been hit for his large number of NPA violations (directed at Arena Net) and has been banned for a month, two or three each time now, considering his numbr of past blocks for NPA violations. &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  18:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No, Auron does use those words, just not on the wiki. <font color="#DD0000">Misery  18:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but failure to specify on my part, that's what I was getting at :P &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  18:16, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Auron is a pretty cool guy that doesn't afraid of anything. ^^ --<font color="Black">Cursed Angel [[Image:User Cursed Angel Signature2.jpg|19px|Q.Q]] 19:41, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Jon, you certainly seem to talk quite a bit about Shard...I almost get the impression you might fancy him with how much you mention him. I'm a little jealous. :P -- *Yasmin Parvaneh* [[Image:User_yasmin_parvaneh_sig.png]] 08:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There's just a number of people that always jump to the front of your mind when certain subjects come up, is all. If vandalism comes up, I'm sure I, or someone else, would bring up Raptors. &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  15:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * NIGGERS --[[image:User_FlamingMetroid_Metroidsig.png ‎| 19px]] Metroid 05:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Kindly, nou. <3  [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]]  Raine   - talk  06:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Killing vandal pages...
Thanks. I didn't even have to mark it. mtew 04:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You did put it on AN... At times thats enough ;) And then there's always RC ;) -- Silent Storm  [[Image:User SilentStorm MySig.png|Talk to me|19px]] 04:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did ask about what to do on GWW:AN, and Auron acted quickly in response, going beyond simply answering the question. I thank him for that.     mtew 15:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

o lawd
you done got censored, bro Vili 13:54, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * ??? - Auron 14:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, who cares? Random people who violate policy and think they're above the rules don't bother me. I stated my position and no amount of archiving will save him from a ban, if he breaks policy again. I'd have blocked him for it already, but since I don't like him in the least, I wouldn't have wanted anyone to think I was singling him out. - Auron 14:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Your Face
WTFPWNED --72.90.60.41 15:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

SUP DAWG
WE HEARD YOU LIKE GUILDWARS, SO WE PUT GUILDWARS IN YO GUILDWARS SO YOU CAN GUILDWARS WHILE YOU GUILDWARS. --<font color="Black">Cursed Angel  18:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * i dont like guildwars. but that meme is pretty good. - Auron 18:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You spoony bard! --72.90.60.41 23:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Auron likes getting spooned --[[image:User_FlamingMetroid_Metroidsig.png ‎| 19px]] Metroid 03:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If you dont like GW, why do you still play it? Lol, why do people moan about things and then still do them? --Burning Freebies 16:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Auron won halls just a few hours ago. Sup? Vili [[Image:User Vili sig.jpg|User talk:Vili]] 16:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * lol retard alert.Pika Fan 16:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * WoW is down for maintenance. Stop being bad. - Auron 17:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It reminds me about how people complain about CounterStrike yet still play it. --[[Image:User PoA Sig.png|Talk]] Antioch 17:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Fuck this wiki. Especially the search function.  I'm tired of putting up with this crap.  [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]]  Raine   - talk  18:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep, the search function REALLY sux. Just being able to AND two search terms would help.      mtew 18:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Elessedil
Judging by your character 'Auron Elessedil' I'm guessing you've read a bit of Terry Brooks? I think that's pretty cool; I'm a big Brooks fan, myself. - AraAra 02:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea, the name was supposed to be ahren too actually but it was taken. I met brooks a few years back at a book signing at my aunt's bookstore, we had lunch together and talked about the series. I was already hooked by then, but after that I decided I'd probably keep buying his books till the end of time. - Auron 05:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm the proud owner of username "Allanon" in another game (although they don't have druids yet, which made me sad). Every once in a while I get love/hatemail because of it... it's great :p Vili [[Image:User Vili sig.jpg|User talk:Vili]] 05:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * "Elessedil" looks akin to Sindarin and is composed of a few Sindarin word parts, as well as being close to Elesaar. It wouldn't surprise me if the name was inspired by Tolkien's languages, as so much of fantasy is inspired by The Lord of the Rings. The Elvish in the Warcraft games is a boarder-line copy of Sindarin...... &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  15:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You spoony bard! --173.50.34.30 02:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Auron: You had lunch with Brooks?  That's pretty cool!  I'd like to meet him someday (a long-time goal of mine) and talk to him about a few things.  You should consider yourself lucky to have met him in person and actually get to know him!  Out of curiosity, what was he like? - Ara

Subject Goes Here!
Why have I not read your userpage before? It's got enough pessimism in it to last me a week. Or a weekend at least. :-) Biscuits 17:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * And that proves that the group of pessimists is a subset of the group of optimists.Pika Fan 19:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Is the glass half full, half empty, or twice as large as it needs to be? Vili [[Image:User Vili sig.jpg|User talk:Vili]] 21:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The water is twice as dense as it should be. <font color="#DD2200">Lord Belar 21:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The glass contains %50 water, %50 air. &mdash; Jon  [[Image:User_Jon_Lupen_Sig_Image.png|18px]]  Lupen  22:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/6189/glassis50.jpg - Auron 22:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The glass is in a symmetric state of fullness.     mtew 08:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Who the fuck has been drinking from my glass? <font color="#DD0000">Misery  12:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

how
can you make 125k a week without opening the game? --<font color="Black">Cursed Angel  23:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * https://www.guildwars.com/competitive/xunlai_tournament_house/default.php - Auron 00:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Zkeys have deflated, he only makes 100K a week. --[[Image: User_Ezekial_Riddle_sig.jpg|19px|Talk]] Riddle 01:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * on the contrary, my guesses keep getting better (and less good guilds participate, which also makes guessing easier). deflation but more accurate guesses rounds out to about the same amount. - Auron 01:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I tried that last month, (I picked guilds at random and i have no idea) I got like 5 keys... if you could tell me your guesses i could give you half my keys? it's a win/win. --<font color="Black">Cursed Angel [[Image:User Cursed Angel Signature2.jpg|19px|Q.Q]] 01:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * problem is you have to be online right before the tournament, so you can revise with any last minute changes I make based on who is trading players to who. I can't make super solid guesses way in advance. - Auron 02:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * A good strategy is to put rawr at #1. --[[Image: User_Ezekial_Riddle_sig.jpg|19px|Talk]] Riddle 15:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * yeah that 5 points is crucial, any tips on the other 15 slots? oh k. - Auron 15:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I can be online whenever, that shouldn't be a problem. but I can't see rawr on the list that shows up... --<font color="Black">Cursed Angel [[Image:User Cursed Angel Signature2.jpg|19px|Q.Q]] 18:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * They're playing on a smurf, hit me up on IRC and i'll tell you the name. - Auron 20:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Is this the last day to predict or is that tomorrow? --<font color="Black">Cursed Angel [[Image:User Cursed Angel Signature2.jpg|19px|Q.Q]] 13:51, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

I own you
You can ban me, but you'll never ban yourself! --72.90.43.172 04:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

sup
Brosef 05:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * brah! Sup brah 05:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

You call this satire?
Quote: ''So knowing that, imagine what it would take for a small team of untalented people and myself to create a new map. We could only make a new map if we did our jobs, which is simply out of the question.'' That's an insult if I ever saw one. But I suppose it's not a personal attack because he insults the entire team instead of individual persons? 145.94.74.23 13:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * He is implying people are not doing their jobs, I am not sure I see the personal attack there, would you care to elabourate? Pretty sure he could directly say "The design team are not doing their jobs" and it still wouldn't be a personal attack, because you see... he isn't attacking them personally. <font color="#DD0000">Misery  13:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Just because you don't like or agree with Shard doesn't mean he's breaking policies. I may be wrong, but I believe Auron is demonstrating this.
 * Also, there's a pretty big difference between an insult and a personal attack. For example, Auron's a red billystick. 69.109.168.30 14:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I am one indeed!
 * Yes, 145, that is satire. In case you are unfamiliar with the concept, I would ask you to read some more of it - satire, more often than not, is insulting. Something else that might help you understand the concept is the wikipedia article, the first paragraph of which describes exactly what I've stated here but in greater detail. Specifically, "In satire, human or individual vices... or shortcomings are held up to censure by means of ridicule, derision, burlesque, irony, or other methods, ideally with the intent to bring about improvement." That is spot on what Shard is doing - satirizing ANet's decisions and responses to the public. - Auron 18:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, so I suppose that calling other people untalented is ok then? I'd just like to know which insults I can use here without getting a warning...there's a lot of people that are very untalented here. And on a side note, is something a personal attack if you direct it at a group instead of naming each individual seperately? Because I happen to dislike a certain group people who complain at Anet, have a Skill of the Day, got banned a lot in the past and are supposedly programming their own game. Those people are very untalented. Or is that breaking the discrimination rule? 145.94.74.23 07:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikilawyering isn't a violation of policy, technically. GL with that, though.  [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]]  Raine   - talk  07:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Use common sense, and start with using it before posting. If the "certain group people" is exactly one person, don't bother trying to play it off as anything but what it is - you disliking another user. Dislike is fine, and isn't against any policy I know of - but don't get stupid and make it into any kind of feud or you run the risk of being blocked for disruption (or any specific policies you break in your attempt to discredit him).
 * You stay on your side of the wiki, and he'll stay on his. His violations are being taken care of by admins, so don't be a prick and try to prod him even more - just leave him alone and I'm sure he'll do the same to you. - Auron &gt;8&lt; 07:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You're missing my point Auron: I was asking why it's a problem to insult individual people but it isn't when you insult an entire group at once just to save time. 145.94.74.23 08:08, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's common sense to me that an insult is an insult, wheter it breaks the policy designed to counter them or not. As for being that prodding prick: all I'll do is report the things my that common sense says are insults. I won't talk to or about those people any more than I have to. But when it comes to common sense and simple decency, well, then this wiki could use a lot more of both. 145.94.74.23 08:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Because satire is a higher form of communication than simple insults. It has nothing to do with insulting a group of people over a single person, and I don't know why you got that impression to begin with. To quote for emphasis, "In satire, human or individual vices... or shortcomings are held up to censure by means of ridicule, derision, burlesque, irony, or other methods, ideally with the intent to bring about improvement." There is a difference between that and "man anet sux." Satire is okay - as long as it is done well. Harassment, asshattery, and pointless insults are not. Shard has been blocked for the latter in the past, and is learning to refine his points and argue with more tact.
 * Regardless, I think you're forgetting some minor details. You're whining incessantly about how it's ok for Shard to insult people when it's fucking obvious that it isn't, and several admins have attested to that in the form of blocks. If you're going to rant about common sense, look in the mirror first, please. - Auron &gt;8&lt; 08:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Also I want to note, that if someone said "anet are a bunch of pricks because they dont do their job and heres how to fix it...", then even though they might be trying to be constructive and it was aimed at a group, they would still be in breach of NPA. In short attacking someone's work is not attacking the person. I don't personally like what Shard has on his page, however it isn't breaching NPA directly. -- Salome  [[Image:User_salome_sig2.png|19px]] 09:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, you could have just said that in the first place and I wouldn't have bothered you about it anymore. I guess you just wanted to educate me though...thanks for the lesson. 145.94.74.23 07:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Too bad Maddox is slow with the updates nowadays, eh? 68.51.95.206 23:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Firefox
Here is a place that explains on how to remove custom word dictionaries (apparently, you added a custom word for "serious"). -- Antioch 21:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * if serious was in the dictionary, wouldn't it have come up as an underline if I spelled it wrong? :/ - Auron 21:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, I found out why it was not "spelled wrong". It's a real term. --[[Image:User PoA Sig.png|Talk]] Antioch 21:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * yes, i found that out too. - Auron 21:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Toucher Lover?
Isn't touchers lame? Isn't 5en cost touch in 16 expertise? Why you deleted my words? Or ur just a toucher lover dont want face the truth, you play toucher, you'll get flamed. --61.65.70.49 09:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The wiki is for non subjective documentation of the game. Whether you feel a build is lame or not it should not be reflected in mainspace articles. If you wish to provide your personal opinions you can feel free to register a username and post in your userspace. --[[Image:User Wynthyst sig icon.png | Wyn's Talk page]] Wyn 09:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

spider pride
you phylumist Vili &gt;8&lt; 09:44, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * what's with the >8< in your sig? --<font color="Black">Cursed Angel [[Image:User Cursed Angel Signature2.jpg|19px|Q.Q]] 00:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Reread the section title. <font color="#DD2200">Lord Belar 01:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * biology phail - <tt>Y0_ ich_halt </tt> [[Image:User Y0_ich_halt sig.png|18px]] 21:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?sid=1&topicId=15864846564 - Auron &gt;8&lt; 22:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * oic, it's a thing between that kind of people... it's still biology phail. anub'arak had better count his legs another time. - <tt>Y0_ ich_halt </tt> [[Image:User Y0_ich_halt sig.png|18px]] 12:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi
Auron, both JonTheMon, an IP trolling my page, and Anja agree the page was fine the way it was. Salome also seemed perfectly satisfied. I refuse to have my page edited particularly by other people, just in case the point is not clear every time somebody doesn't love it the way it is. I am reverting your edit on *my* UserPage, as frankly the majority of those concerned, the marjority of Sysops concerned, have no problem with it.

Next time you have a dispute with me, feel free to talk to me about it on my *Talk*Page. Like I said - I have already edited the page to please Sysops, at the moment you appear to be the only one who has a problem with it. --> A F K When  Needed 18:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Another thing - it should be up to me, if the page is unacceptable which to most it is not... how it is improved upon to make it acceptable. I'd be much more open to your suggestions, and much less hostile, if you recognised everyone but you agreed it was fine and asked me to change it instead of simply editing my page, which I frankly am getting pissed off with other people taking it upon themselves to do.


 * If I get agreement from several Sysops, please bear it in mind and consider being polite. I'm a responsive person, go in being headstrong and I'll return the favor. Have a nice day. --> A F K When  Needed 18:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Uh.. where exactly did you read that the above people find it fine? Anja told you to remove it, Salome didn't like the way it was presented (i.e. as the new messages message), and the IP... well, he wanted both the box and the link to go. Considering that you've ignored other people's requests to remove or change the appearance of the box and/or the link, I don't think you are being "a responsive person". -- [[Image:User Brains12 circle sig.png|18px|]] Brains12 \ talk 18:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Brains consider reading Anja's TalkPage and enlightening yourself. Don't join a dispute which is largely over just to throw your weight around. Apart from Auron everyone says it's fine. --> A F K When  Needed 18:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I really don't get you. You've seen they agree - you posted further down in that same section... --> A F K When  Needed 18:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ack, I'm getting mixed up with the timestamps and history times and when I was online to message etc - DST and all that. Still, Auron's point about imitating the system message still stands - there are a number of ways to link that, and it doesn't have to be a system-wide style. I hadn't thought this discussion was over considering it's still ongoing, and my weight kinda too heavy to throw around, but I digress. -- [[Image:User Brains12 circle sig.png|18px|]] Brains12 \ talk 18:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, reread that discussion. They agree my one is fine, CA's they're not as happy with, then move on. If it's still ongoing... where is it ongoing? Either reading where the link points, or the message, tells you it's not a system message. Now, if you click on links before looking at the page in question, it's not me falling short. How can you stick the mouse on top of words without so much as reading them? --> A F K When  Needed 19:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Your userpage is free to have whatever shit you want, up to a point. Banners imitating legitimate system messages is past that point. I'm not sure what people's fascination with trying to imitate that particular message is, but people have been trying to do it since GWiki, and have been getting it removed since GWiki, too. Provide a single good reason why you can't have that banner in any other color (or style, or size, or placement, or any of the hundred plus things you could do to make it not like the system message) and I'll be more willing to listen. But so far, your only excuse is "it's my userspace, I can do what I want," which is complete bullshit as an argument, since it holds about as much water as "it's my userspace, i can attack others if I want." As a side note, being hostile won't help your case in the least, since I'm not about to be intimidated. - Auron &gt;8&lt; 20:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I never mentioned intimidation; I said I would not be inclined to listen to any suggestions you may have. If I saw on my Talk Page something like Hi / I realize other Sysops have given you the all clear, but I'd be grateful if you'd change the banner again, thanx - Auron, I'd start thinking of ways to do this, and I'd happily look at anything you'd suggest e.g. a green box
 * My point is if it's my User Page and I've gone out of my way to ensure the current style is accepted by Admins - and it was - by more than one, it would show better decorum to try and keep that in mind. I made a UserPage, I changed it after being asked to, I checked the new version with the Admin who asked me to change in the first place (instead just running up to a Sysop I know IRL or whatever). After I'd done that (which imo makes me rather reasonable, to be fair) you really didn't have to take it upon yourself to ignore the opinions of others and edit my own page without my consent. You must have seen I was taking advice / instructions on board and there was no need to do it yourself. You ignored this, however.
 * And no particular fascination, I saw it on CA's page and, after being tricked by it; was forced to agree it was impressive. Did I post a WoT of QQ on his TalkPage? No. I thought it was brilliant and, after the most minor of improvements, added it to my own Page. I didn't cry about hacksites durr... idiot IP, I didn't moan about being tricked. Such things happen in life - and I lost nothing, and had a laugh. And I've already stated my response when people approached me about my own Page, so I won't repeat it.
 * A final point: You may dispute my first response, but I'd ask you to bear in mind I was dealing with an IP trolling on several pages about something due to hacksites... --> A F K When  Needed 20:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Sysop sysop is sysop. I would say something about how you shouldn't troll the admins or you should just be grateful Auron didn't ban you outright or whatever, but Auron's actually responsible and doesn't do stuff like that. Still, sysops uphold the policy of the wiki to their discretion, and until this wiki becomes a democracy, maybe you should consider listening to them instead of bitching at them over minor things. 69.109.167.12 22:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Troll the admins? That's hilarious, you may well notice I came here so that, by contacting him, I could edit my page so he is satisfied with it, and that I still like it myself. Troll less yourself, I started this section on his TalkPage to talk to him, troll less yourself. --> A F K When  Needed 11:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * As Brains already proved, any random person can talk on any other random person's talk page. 69.109.167.253 14:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * And yet the word trolling exists. My point stands. --> A F K When  Needed 18:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * People resort to trolling retards, because no amount of logic gets past their thick skulls. You are being trolled now, so add 2 and 2.Pika Fan 01:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 4? I don't get it. <font color="#DD0000">Misery  09:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Wasn't it 1? Neither do I, I lifted all that from some website. :xPika Fan 19:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You may wish to peruse GWW:NPA. I think you'll find that there is no exception for indirect wording. Backsword 03:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You may wish to refer this to an admin. I think it is pretty obvious I don't really care. Pika Fan 22:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

TROLLS TROLLING TROLLS TROLLING TROLLS TROLLING TROLLS TROL.... 68.51.95.206 06:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Treasure Hunter?
^?   Raine   - talk  02:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * makes trolling euros easier since they don't see the r10 and assume i'm unranked :p - Auron &gt;8&lt; 02:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)