User talk:Backsword

Before i keep reverting...
Got background data for ?--Fighterdoken 03:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

deep npc's
Was a affiliation ever decided on for these? eg. Deep or The deep. Fall 10:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Sundering Attack's note
Are you sure it doesn't activate in 1/2s? I'll do some testing later, but have you tested it yourself? --JonTheMon 13:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

German Keyboard?
Is this the hint? Ɲ oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  13:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Could be Swedish, or Finnish also. And I have probably missed some languages. - anja  [[Image:User Anja Astor sig icon.png|talk]] 16:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The point is that " ä/Ä " is directly next to " '/#" on German keyboards >:P Ɲ oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  17:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * äÄ is next to '* on Swedish :P I know from experience, I do that typo all the time. - anja  [[Image:User Anja Astor sig icon.png|talk]] 19:45, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's true, she does. -- [[Image:User Brains12 circle sig.png|18px|]] Brains12 \ talk 20:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * itÄs true, i do too. - Y0_ ich_halt  [[Image:User Y0_ich_halt sig.png|18px]] 17:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * OH SNAP! - Y0_ ich_halt  [[Image:User Y0_ich_halt sig.png|18px]] 17:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Zaishen Menagerie
As asked for, here are the mission ID's for the Menagerie: "Zaishen Menagerie" is the outpost name and the mission ID is 795. "Zaishen Menagerie Grounds" is the explorable and the mission ID is 794. Hope that's what you were looking for! - Linsey talk 18:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Linsey ish smexxxy. I'd cream my pants if she ever posted on my talk page. :D - L ena™  [[Image:User_Lena_Sig.png]] talk 18:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Quest Log sections
Where is the master list of these quest log sections? --JonTheMon 15:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * bump --JonTheMon 13:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * bump --JonTheMon 13:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * bump --JonTheMon 15:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * forget it. as far as i recall, backsword hasn't answered to a single post on his talk page. - Y0_ ich_halt  [[Image:User Y0_ich_halt sig.png|18px]] 17:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * He's never responded on his talk page, but he has responded. --JonTheMon 17:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * why are you bumping his talk then? xD - Y0_ ich_halt  [[Image:User Y0_ich_halt sig.png|18px]] 20:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Because if he responds somewhere i'd still be satisfied. --JonTheMon 20:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

not tracking your progress
so I dunno if you have a list of things going, but could you get a pic uploaded for invulnerability? - Auron 12:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Same model, but dyed
Why the "but"? It's not like you couldn't color that model and then have an item with exactly the same appearance as that unique item. &mdash;Zerpha The Improver 14:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Zaishen Challenge Archive
I understand where you're coming from, but there won't necessarily be a pattern, or at least a recognizable pattern for quite some time. There are, what, ~70 missions including the repeatable EotN missions? That's a huge list to have to maintain, especially considering that you're likely to have to be at least partially into the second iteration before you can see any patterns. I think a monthly archive would be much more appropriate, perhaps with the addition of a page that holds the entire list (a research page, or the like). This was also discussed on the talk page, and one month / archive seemed agreeable at the time. Freedom Bound 13:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Keyboard
I think you might want to evaluate how well your keyboard registers the 'g' key. It seems to be missing in many edits. --JonTheMon 21:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Feedback Namespace
Are you interested in being part of this "task force" thing? You have had some good input, and I'm not sure I'm entirely comfortable with the elitism of only a few editors taking control of the organization, although I understand we don't want people finding it randomly and starting to use it before it is ready to go live. Anyway, if you want to take part, I am happy to "nominate" or announce or whatever... I guess I don't even really get how one gets to be part of the task force or what it even really means at this point. Anyway, if you want in, just speak up! (Satanael 16:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC))

GWW:REVERT
Right here. Mediggo 07:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Technically, he didn't violate 1RV. He changed it once, then he used his 1 revert on your revert. --JonTheMon 13:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Dragon Slash (Turai Ossa)
Is there a difference?--Bive 00:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Plz explain this Move suggestion
http://wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=ArenaNet:Skill_feedback/PvE/Classes_of_2009_Issues&oldid=1548404 That part of the Wiki is for Skill Feedback. And that's what it's being used for. And I DO NOT WANT IT ON MY OWN USERSPACE. The entire reason I moved it there was to pre-empt it being moved to my user space. -- ilr  20:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It appears you don't even respond to your own TalkPage. So I offer you 24 hours to respond here before I revert or modify your vandalism -- ilr [[image:User_ilr_deprav.png]] 21:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)


 * ANet can't take feedback in anything except the feedback namespace due to copyright problems (basically, GW would have to be open source). This means that any suggestions need to be in either the Feedback namespace, where everything is automatically ANet's property, or in the Userspace, where suggestions aren't read or acknowledged by ANet. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 21:49, 28 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Also, chill. You gave him less than an hour to reply. Not everyone stalks wiki. Maybe he's out to dinner with family or something (though I admit history shows us he probably won't reply anyway). -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 21:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * What? Nothing in the article is a suggestion, otherwise Wyn would have 'X'ed it out days ago when it first appeared on Linsey's Page. All I'm asking for is that people actually read what's going on before MOVING it.  Thank you. -- ilr [[image:User_ilr_deprav.png]] 22:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * A little common courtesy goes both ways.[[Image:User DrogoBoffin sig icon.png|Talk page]] Drogo Boffin 23:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Nothing here. Go away.
why don't you ever make a userpage? --Cursed Angel  12:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Sock
I'm not a huge fan of being on someone else's foot. &mdash; Jon    Lupen  16:11, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ew.. But anyway, all Jon and I were trying to do was get your comment to match the format in the instructions on responding to the RfA, no harm intended. --Freedom Bound 16:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't forget about 1RR. --JonTheMon 16:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Csig
could need a disambig with Cautery Signet MrPaladin talk 14:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * or Cap sig. --User Ezekial Riddle bigsig.png Rid dle 14:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Quest Table
Would you like to get some opinions on it before putting it on main pages? And by "like to get" I mean "get". --JonTheMon 14:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Game link:Quest 942
Game link:Quest 942 redirects to "Gates of Ktyta (Zaishen quest)". Is this a typo on your part or intentional? I don't have the quest to check it myself. -Smurf 21:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --[[Image:User Wandering Traveler Sig2.png|19px]] Wandering Traveler  22:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Seems I'm not getting something...
What...is your problem with the info on the Masochism page? There is no real dispute, it seems like you are just creating one. LunarEffect 05:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Truly sorry, Backsword, I really wasn't getting what you were on about. Please ignore my previous post! =) LunarEffect [[Image:User_LunarEffect_Moon.png]] 15:17, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Guild Infobox changes
What are you trying to do change with the guild infobox and why are you making a template to display that info in a table? --JonTheMon 17:18, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd say he's trying to create a DPL list of guilds and their main features, so you can scroll down a list and find one that suits your interests without having to click through to each individual guild page through the category listings. Quite a nice idea, actually. --Freedom Bound 17:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Too bad dpl's 500 item limitation is going to implode. -- Wyn [[Image:User Wynthyst sig icon2.png|19px ]] talk  17:32, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi
You're an idiot. Just lettin you know, bro. No Distinguishing Features 17:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

My edit on Kralkatorrik
I'd like to know why you reverted my edit to Kralkatorrik as "fan-fiction"? All I did was minor cleanup and moved it to its official name. --Santax (talk · contribs) 17:14, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

1
It breaks the page. Clear disruption is clear. How much more obvious does it have to be? – Emmett  21:45, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Stop trying to edit my comment as it shows the fact that I found it hahahah amusing very well. --&#91;&#91;User:Auron&#39;s Stalker&#93;&#93; 21:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi
I won't be here long. First of all, you're always wrong about everything, but I'm at least going to humor you this time. This is about your post on Linsey's talk page citing my henchmen bar page as a "conspiracy theory." There are many things wrong with that claim. Firstly, it's not a conspiracy if the people submitting and checking the builds aren't communicating with each other at all (if they were, the contest would have had a non-stupid outcome). Secondly, being on observe mode for the past 10-24 months instead of pvx for the past 10-24 months doesn't make them any more original. The fact is those builds are well-known (in most cases meta-builds) and used by practically everybody on a daily basis. I only cited pvx because I didn't want to spend hours of my life trolling observe mode, frapsing those bars, and making a youtube video to link to. Before I go, I'd like to politely ask you to apply common sense to any and all of your future opinions, especially when other people have to interpret them. Thanks. ~Shard  03:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Wut?
In reference to your comment on regis page may i say, "Wut?" -- Salome    15:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Once again, WUT?! -- Salome   [[Image:User_salome_sig2.png|19px]] 15:43, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Moving pages
Just reminding you to remember to check the "what links here" pages when you move a page. The Gladius pages that you've moved still have plenty of links to them and when the redirect (that you tagged for a speedy) is deleted will lead to a red link. The speedy is also not correct at it is a necessary redirect because you have not changed the links. As per the move page "You are responsible for making sure that links continue to point where they are supposed to go" (emphasis added), so make sure you redirect all the links to the proper page when you move one. If you are looking to move all campaign specific titles, you'll have to be moving a lot of pages ;). Also it would be better to tag the pages for a suggested move before moving them straight away. ~Celestia 00:03, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Wait a minute
  

Please stop failing. ~Shard  07:39, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Let me know if you're still having trouble reading. I would be more than happy to make a photoshop picture highlighting the words. ~Shard  [[Image:User Shard Sig Icon.png]] 07:43, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Hold grudges much?
Hi. This is hypocritical of this and this. It's not like you respond to your talk page first, but I though I'd let you know before you continue this vendetta against my contributions. <font color="#bb00bb" size="3px">~Celestia 09:02, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Backsword doesn't hold grudges, he's just oddly often inconsistent. Unless, of course, I'm wrong, then it is that he holds a grudge against everybody --User Ezekial Riddle bigsig.png Rid dle 09:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

What did you mean?
"You may be careful with that, given how it blew up on me when I tried. Backsword 19:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)" ? <font color="#C10000">Ɲ <font color="#000000">oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  19:44, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It is quite simple: Once upon a time phantom keys could be used all in TotPK. However, it prove to be to easy to do chest runs for the second most valued chests in Prophecies - so the phantom chests have been removed from the first level in an undocumented update. <font color="#C10000">Ɲ <font color="#000000">oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  01:22, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Inscribed Wall
This page is redirected for a reason. The actual page linked to other pages is here. The redirect is for those who only type in Inscribed Wall. Thanks -- riyen ♥  01:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Agent
I did that to reserve a place for a non-disguise page. Also, this name (as it currently is) fits the other skill-changing disguises much better. I suggest you remove the tag again. <font color="#C10000">Ɲ <font color="#000000">oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  02:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

huh?
Why are we moving a legitimate mainspace article to someones userspace? Its a landmark. Give it a main name, put it under Category:Landmarks, and thats that. I honestly don't see how this is not a landmark. Its big and shiny and glowy and purple and actually does something in the game. Is that not reason enough? -- <font color="#D2691E">Wandering <font color="#D2691E">Traveler  02:22, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I copied information to the page you, backsword, created. It abides by the GWW:LOCATIONS, so please don't make it a 'creature' as it is not movable. -- [[File:User Ariyen sig icon.gif]] riyen ♥ 02:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello again
Can you stop posting things you disagree with. Thanks. ~Shard  04:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * knowing backsword, he prolly thinks Frozenwind and Norgu are PCs -- adrin [[Image:User_Adrin_mysig.jpg|20px]] 04:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Affiliation revisited...
There is some discussion going on about the affiliation setting on the npc infoboxes, and since i think it was you who added it on the first place, it may be a good idea to get your input there.--Fighterdoken 23:09, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Deleted image
To be fair, when you go to the image page, it doesn't list any pages it's used on, because of its instances are links to the image. --JonTheMon 03:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

If you have some sort of issue...
...I'd prefer you come to my talkpage with it, rather than tagging it on to your vote on Gordon's recon. It's like, "Hey, I think Gordon should keep his sysop, and by the way fuck you Vili." Really, man?

I don't know what you are basing your perceptions on. If I was Auron I'd call you out for being out of line with reality, but I'm not; so instead I'll just state that contrary to what you may think, I don't have a "gang" of loyal followers who I urge to vote alongside me in solidarity, thus helping to game the system and corrupt the good and faithful editors of the wiki. I am just another voice in the wind like yourself; my words may (or may not!) carry slightly more weight because of who I was in the past on a different wiki, and the number of acquaintances I have made here. I don't claim to represent the community any more than the next editor. I don't head a faction of angry editors who oppose you at every turn; if you are trying to paint me in the same light as Shard once was ("a rabble-rouser and the king of trolls"), that is a flat-out lie with nothing to support it. (I would also hate to see at least two of this wiki's valued sysops, Emmett and Gares Redstorm, portrayed as members of a clandestine cabal.)

Most of all, I don't insinuate that others vote the way they do because of ulterior motives rather than a sincere desire to express their honest thoughts and opinions about a candidate. If the wiki has truly come to such a state that one cannot even place a dissenting vote without being accused of playing politiks, there are much bigger problems afoot than my imaginary mafia.

Have a nice day, and even though I know you won't, please respond to this on your own talkpage. It is such a simple thing, and yet it would make so many people happy. Vili &#x70B9; 07:14, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

When in Rome...
I am responding on your talk page as is the custom in this land. I've noticed your nomination of me for sysop duties and I had a couple of questions. Firstly, is there a particular reason you wanted to do this before the elections end or were you just making me aware of it before I disappear for a bit? Does the nomination still stand in light of what I have said on my bureaucrat election page? Feel free to respond here or on my talk page, I should know what you are on about. <font color="#A55858">Misery  09:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You seem to be away, but I went ahead and accepted based on other people's comments, so no need to respond. It seems to be going rather well. <font color="#A55858">Misery  15:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Nomination
I expected to be nominated for adminship at some point. You, however, are the second-to-last person I expect to do the nominating (Rezyk being the first).

Guild Wars Wiki talk:Arbitration committee/2007-12-30-User:Tanaric

What's changed that you'd support me as sysop now?

&mdash;Tanaric 19:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Tanaric, did you get my email ~20 months ago? -Rezyk --76.195.36.239 20:39, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I did, and I appreciated it. And I echo the sentiments. I do not need to be a sysop to do the things we agree on. &mdash;Tanaric 20:47, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Backsword, since apparently you don't respond to questions on talk, I'm going to assume this isn't a joke nomination and accept. &mdash;Tanaric 22:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Guidelines
My understanding, this is what a sandbox is for - for many 'major' changes like you had made 3 times. I can say I'd suggest each change in a sandbox, suggest it, before 'implementing' your changes as 'versions', etc. I think that would be better than the 'little' attention you had. That way others can decide on it, too, and suggest changes. Adding it to the rfc, if it's not already there. Just thought I'd be nice to share an opinion. -- riyen ♥  17:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I can't really understand what Ariyen is saying there, but I suspect she's attempting to advocate the creation of a subpage for each different version so people can see them without flipping through the article's history. If that's the case, I agree with her -- that's the typical mechanism for proposals like yours. &mdash;Tanaric 21:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I am trying to suggest a creation of a Sandbox aka
 * This User:Backsword/Sandbox/GuidelineExample1 (or whatever title you want your subpage to be other than GuidelineExample1) and User:Backsword/Sandbox/GuidelineExample2 (or whatever title you want your subpage to be other than GuidelineExample2) and User:Backsword/Sandbox/GuidelineExample3 (or whatever title you want your subpage to be other than GuidelineExample3)
 * In that page, copy the guidelines Basics so to speak and then do as you wish on your sandbox pages that you created, to keep from messing up the actual page to 'propose' an idea.
 * Save your sandbox pages, post links to the talk page of guideline and then post the link of talk page on rfc to get comments. That might help a lot more. That was my suggestion that I was trying in smaller words to say. So, just decided to detail it more. -- [[File:User Ariyen sig icon.gif]] riyen ♥ 01:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

regarding the Ruby Djinn page
I cleaned it up a bit. Creating two pages for the same creature is redundant, and can easily just have the two locations listed instead, which I have done. Thus, this and this also are redundant. I am going to remove the two pages that you made, if you don't disagree. --<font color="Black" face="cambria">rawr   <font face="Arial" color="black" size="1">16:04, 4 January 2010

Category:NPCs with species set
Do you intend to ask for a bot run to change the species parameters to type in these articles, or do you want to do something else with these? Is it worth making it a hidden category, so it won't show up in the articles' category lists? Answer on my talk page or Category talk:NPCs with species set if you want. -- pling 22:15, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

NPC formatting
sigh Where was consensus reached that the mission section was to be removed? Hmmm? --JonTheMon 15:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

=/
While I agree the original edit was a waste, reverting Americanization seems even more of a waste of time and effort. <font color="#A55858">Misery  15:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I figured it should be changed because the update pages is like that, but whatever. - Mini Me   talk  17:55, 23 February 2010

whats new bro?
^-- adrin  08:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Concept art
You need to tag concept art images with instead of. - Mini Me   talk  15:34, 4 April 2010

Reverting me
So, very nice revert reasons you got there, eh? Eh? --JonTheMon 17:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Referring to Golden Egg (item effect), the file was moved, so your link is broken. Revert yourself.--User Oneshot O.JPG neshot 18:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Balistic did it, never mind.--User Oneshot O.JPG neshot 18:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Put it back.
The comment is that the 'bug' can be considered a useful feature. That is a fact about the game and how to play the game. As such, it belongs in the wiki. Put it back and let Jon do his own dirty work. --Max 2 04:55, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Why?
, can you explain why you did that? Reaper of Scythes ** 23:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Edits to the Undead Page
Hello. You undid my edits to the Undead page. I added "Creature Types" as a category to these in order to make them appear on the http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Category:Creature_types list. When you undid my revision, they no longer appeared on that page. Why are Undead not a creature type like, say, Trolls? The game has slaying mods for both undead (i.e. Hammer Grip of Deathbane) and trolls (Hammer Grip of Trollslaying.) What's the objection to having Undead listed as a creature type and making them appear on that category list page? Thanks LicensedLuny 23:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

HoM
Before reverting me, you should have looked at the format of any other explorable area, such as Jaga Moraine, and note that Charmable Animals are listed in their own section at the same level as Allies and Foes. And by your logic, try to use an ally spell on them. Now go revert yourself. Thx. <font color="#000099">Rose Of Kali 13:42, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

An explanation of my edit on the Shining Blade page
Most categories have a * for category-named articles. I like consistency. -- Konig / talk 15:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Golden Egg
You should have taken it to the talk page first, especially as the original naming changes were disputed. --JonTheMon 17:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

War in Kryta pages
Stop being stupid. What Wyn is doing is a good idea,and she's actually putting the effort in to make it so this wiki has the information it hasn't had in the 2 odd weeks it's been available. You're saying that they shouldn't be classed as separate areas, that doesn't mean delete them, hell I'm sure I read somewhere "why don't we make it a subpage" from someone, suggest that instead of deleting useful information. 74.63.112.137 16:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oi you damn IP, i may support wyns theory but thats no case for lashing out at someone.-- Nei l2250  ,    Render Lord User Neil2250 sig icon6.png 16:59, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * There's no need for "Oi you damn IP", either. -- pling User Pling sig.png 17:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * But pling! Someone needs to find a way to use "Oi!" It's such an underused word... :( -- Konig / talk 18:46, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeh D: its 2 letters from Oink :D -- Nei l2250  ,    Render Lord User Neil2250 sig icon6.png 18:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Doctor Jung's Remedies and Potions
Hi there, I'm sort of new at this, wiki editing and such. Regarding this NPC, you added in the trivia "Doctor Carl Jung was one of the founders of Psychoanalysis, a famous Pseudoscience." Since the fact that being a Pseudoscience is being disputed by the scientific community, could you please erase that part? Thanks. Enoxon 23:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * As this is a public access wiki, you are more than welcome to modify or remove any information that you believe to be in error, and in fact I would encourage you to do so. Even though you may not be familiar with wiki editing yet, I encourage you to be bold and try anyway. Practice makes perfect. [[Image:User_Felix_Omni_Signature.png]]elix Omni 00:13, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick response. Enoxon 18:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Splits
Would you care to comment at least on why you want these sections split? Or do you just put it up there for shits and giggles? At least the Goon was given a partial reason, though figuring out what you tried to mean wasn't worth the effort I put in, and someone else seems to have cleaned up the Thrall. G R E E N E R 07:22, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Weapon mastery reduces AR?
Uh, since when? --JonTheMon 13:51, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Seriously... is there any evidence to back this up? -- Lania Elderfire [[Image:User Lania Elderfire pinkribbon.jpg]] 17:38, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Slavers' Exile
WTF Backsword. That was a redirect initially and then someone overwrote it with GWW's page. --JonTheMon 13:57, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Generally speaking if something like that happens with a copyright violation on an existing page, you would be better reverting the page, then asking on the admin noticeboard for the relevant revisions to be deleted. That reduces the number of revisions that need to be deleted. In no case is it useful to enter into an edit war. <font color="#A55858">Misery  15:45, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Armor rating
I would really like to know how you came to the conclusion that attribute rank has anything to do with damage multiplication with normal attacks. Pay attention to this part:

The damage multiplier can also be found for non attack skills if the attacker is level 20 with the equation



To simplify that (final damage) = (initial damage) * Damage multiplier. Do you see anything in there about attribute in the formula? Attribute just drops the initial damage down and has no effect on how the initial damage is converted to final damage through armor rating. I'll rephrase: The only part attribute governs is the initial damage, which comes from this equation:

$Damage calculation formula5.png$ So please revert this part ,"The table is normalized to an attacker attribute rank 12 for attacks and level 20 for other skills." Back to how it was... unless now you are going to tell me the formula is wrong. -- Lania Elderfire 15:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Random comment from random person
lol'd  A F K  When  Needed 18:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

you should really stop editing on the wiki
your fail meter is too high right now -- adrin  08:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't work to tell him that. He thinks that anyone disagreeing with him is a troll, hence they get ignored... especially if he loses an argument.  -- Lania Elderfire [[Image:User Lania Elderfire pinkribbon.jpg]] 15:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * which is all the time ofc -- adrin [[Image:User_Adrin_mysig.jpg|20px]] 19:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Mhenlo
You should probably provide a destination page or start a section on the talk about the split, or it'll just end up getting removed. --JonTheMon 14:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Crustacean
May I ask where you got the name and this ("The Luxons incorrectly believe them to be agents of The Leviathan" ) from? I searched and have seen no in-game mention of either. So is this fact or did you pull this out of your butt like you did with other things? -- Konig / talk 05:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It's pointless to leave a message here... He'll never reply. -- Lania [[Image:User Lania Elderfire pinkribbon.jpg]] 15:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Still might as well just to show that I asked so it can't be used against me that I did things without reason or attempting discussion. -- Konig / talk 19:08, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * +1 --JonTheMon 19:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Skill animations
I appreciate your attempt at helping earlier over here, but (as you might not have noticed, since I posted it on my own talk page) the problem with your fix is that items which don't have a "skill" associated with them aren't displayed. (For example, Squash Serum and Ghost-in-the-Box.) Any chance you would be able to create a similar template which would use a list of consumables and place the item icons where the "skill" icons would be? --Kyoshi (Talk) 21:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Care to vote?
Yeah, I want you as a supporter for this. haha Theres a couple people that think the voice actor should remain under trivia but I disagree, I think it should be in the infobox. I noticed that some trivia with voice actors have info about the actor instead of character, why not seperate that and make it clearer. Besides, the code may be in all npc pages but they have to add |voiceactor = Bob in order to be effected by the change. Can you please vote? here Lucian Shadowborn   00:35, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Redundant
All the changes to the Enchanted pages are redundant, as they say what they are wielding in the Trivia sections. ♥ Tyloric ♣ 19:37, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Backsword doesn't respond to shit on his talk page. I could call him whatever and he probably wouldn't notice :o -- User Oneshot O.JPG ne shot.   19:40, 16 November 2010.
 * Backsword smells like bananas! - Mini Me  21:29, 16 November, 2010 (UTC)

Please
Do participate in this conversation. - J.P. Talk </b> 15:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, how do you know those are variable damage attacks/skills? are you able to adjust your attributes? --JonTheMon 15:35, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * If you can show that the skills are variable attribute, you should probably list on each skill page the attribute that is used, 'cause it's not very helpful to go back and forth all the time. --JonTheMon 15:46, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

GWB Locations Notation
Please stop removing the Guild Wars Beyond notation from NPC locations. Please see the NPC formatting page. --Musha 08:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Fireworks Master dialogue
There are 2 typos in the Fireworks Master dialogue you added. I've marked them with the sic template. If that is not how those words are spelt in-game, please correct them. --Silver Edge 03:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * More than likely, they are typos on his part. Go ahead and fix them. --JonTheMon 05:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

You can stop now
The merge for the Gwen pages went uncontested except for by you, and you never backed up your claims for why it shouldn't be merged. Stop reverting the redirect bypassing. It not only clogs up recent changes but it'll just have to get reverted again since the changes were based on consensus. So please just stop. -- Konig / talk 04:01, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Backsword, if you dislike the result of the consensus, challenge it on the talk page. Your "vigilante" reverts just make you looks bad. ThrainUser_Thrain_Sig.png contribs 04:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The same goes for the NPC locations for Guild Wars Beyond. I already showed you where you can express your opinions on that. --Musha [[Image:User_Musha_Sigc.png|19px]] 20:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Delete tags
When a speedy delete tag is placed without a proper speedy delete reason, the proper action is to remove the speedy from the delete tag, not to remove the delete tag. - Tanetris 20:25, 25 December 2010 (UTC)