Talk:Lazarus the Dire

Couldn't it be assumed that he is in experimentalist during the quest because the aspect was changed during the Insidious Remnants quest? Random thought

Kinda out on a limb here, but anyone else see some Harry Potter horcrux stuff here?
 * I totally heard Voldemort in that history the whole time I read it.--Ph03n1x 07:23, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's all I hear as well…I'll add a note if no one opposes? Taka Ragranok 18:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

4 left?
think that the shining blade intel that Salma mentions after the Temple of the Intolerable quest counts this guy in the 4 remaining mursaat, and if so are we going to fight him and kill him, or will he really live to punish future generations? It seems pretty weird that the Shining Blade would be on this huge mursaat hunt and it would just slip our mind that "oh, yea, by the way, there's another mursaat we managed to weaken a while back who's now in hiding and is pretty pissed off at us, you might want to try to find him, if you get the time." I know that the Shining blade may not be able to fing him and that would enable his survival, but wouldn't they still count him among the remaining mursaat if they know about him? Lord Zepherr 23:57 June 22, (UTC)
 * Lazarus isn't mentioned as being part of that group of 4, and we're told the mursaat are going to play a role in GW2 somehow, so it's quite possible we will never see Lazarus again until GW2 (though I don't know much about mursaat lifespans). Oh, and a player's involvement in the War in Kryta isn't considered canon; that is, you are only there because ANet wants to show it to you through the game. You aren't actually there, and the Blade may not even know about Lazarus at all. --Kyoshi [[File:User Kyoshi sig.png]] (Talk) 00:04, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Im not so sure about that (Canon issue). I dont believe Anet ever stated that it WASNT canon. However, something we need to keep in mind, this is an MMORPG not simply an RPG. I mean, hypothetically all the players involved in WiK were canonically involved in WiK because WiK canon was the WiK event. I was always under the impression that all our characters were referenced under the Foregin Adventuerers who came to be involved in the bounty hunts and what not. Either way, what is the source on Character involvement = Not Canon.

I mean consider this: The missions such as Riverside Assassination + Temple of Intolerance. All done by player characters, no NPCs. Soooooo the various Mursaat killed in those missions just dropped dead of their own accord I suppose.

My point being: I would suggest character involvement IS canon a la foregin adventurers involved in the war. -- Some guy --The preceding unsigned comment was added by 99.224.198.30 (talk).