User talk:Napalm Flame

Hi. Don't troll. Thanks. -- Brains12 11:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * aww, oke, fine. =[ Napalm Flame 11:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Recent Posts
Hi, Napalm Flame, some of your recent talk page posts could be seen as GWW:NPA violations. I suggest you refrain from making such comment in the future or an admin may have to intervine. Thanks in advance :) -- Shadowphoenix   02:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ohai why should we care? It's NPA, no need to wrap people in cotton wool. In the end, if you start bitching at a troll/spambot/flamer/drama alt, you've got all this shit coming to you. Napalm Flame 02:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Don't troll. kthx.
Apparently you didn't take Shadowphoenix's friendly warning seriously, so let me give you a not-so-friendly one: stop. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 02:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Dude
Don't be dumb, seriously. You've gotten three warnings to not troll in like the first hour since you made this account. You're my friend, but seriously, keep this up and I'll find myself encouraging Aiiane to ban you. -- Armond Warblade 16:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Idk if you think you're interesting by trolling, the moment I saw your comment on Raph's page I got the idea of what person you are. NPA, but you're acting dumb and no1 likes it. Ninjas In The Sky  15:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * no1 likes you imo &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.193.1.106 (talk &bull; contribs) at 16:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC).

Piplup Awareness Campaign
Thank you for your participation in the PAC. However, it seems that users of this site (Guild Wars: Official Wiki ) do not appreciate the value of a loving Piplup gracing their page. It is time the campaign was taken elsewhere, as these cretins can't understand the kind of love and care a Piplup can bring. &mdash;  Skakid  18:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Where shall we be taking our campaign, comrade? TO THE HEART OF THE DEVIL GUILD WARS ITSELF? Or shall we just spam the shit out of some forums and stuff? Napalm Flame 16:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hie thee hence from here, with thy false Piplups; there wilt be a daye whyn yonder wikie shall be thy true Piplup. This be not that daye. Hie ye Piplups hence, for handrawne Piplups canst not bring love, only sorrowe. -- Chaiyo Kaldor  talk contribs 19:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Image
Both images violate userspace policy under "...Do not include any material generally deemed offensive and insulting." So stop. Dominator Matrix  15:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No it doesn't. It's not offensive or insulting. It's a freakin meme, COTTON WOOL MOAR PLZ. Besides, it's an honor to be a meme. Look at cracky for example. Napalm Flame 15:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Dom, where is it offensive and insulting? Corny joke, yes, but I don't see it as being offensive or insulting.  -- Shadowphoenix [[Image:User Shadowphoenix Necromancer.png|19x19px|Please, talk to me; I'm so lonely ;-;]] 19:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Dom i think is doing the same thing many people (including myself) do, might do, or have done, Hes jumping the gun. Knowing Flame's recent history, he might be taking it too seriously. Napalm, i have respect for you, and none of your images i deem offensive as of yet. My only request is that you cut the trolling. Thanks.--[[Image:User_Raph_Sig.png|19px]]Ra ph  Tal ky  01:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Does policy matter at all on this wiki? Or have you gone cold and "oh ya its...not...offensive....". I'm not jumping the gun, im just doing my job. I don't need to walk around the block 4 times before I do something. Dominator Matrix  02:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Explain to us *where* it is breaking policy, and we can address it; but as far as I can tell... it is not breaking policy and since an admin has already dismissed it as not being against policy, then it... well... isn't. I do not see it violating policy, it does not seem offensive or insulting (repeating myself, I know); J. Kougar did not find it offensive/insulting so I would say it isn't.  I just don't see what you mean by "it violates policy" -- Shadowphoenix [[Image:User Shadowphoenix Necromancer.png|19x19px|Please, talk to me; I'm so lonely ;-;]] 02:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * From GWW:USER "Use common sense and keep etiquette in mind when selecting content:
 * Do not include any material generally deemed offensive and insulting." Dominator Matrix  02:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The way I see it, you have to pick your battles. If it's an image that an admin has let it pass, the "target" has seen and deemed amusing, and no one on the talk page is agreeing with you, it's not "generally deemed" offensive, and even if some other, non-admin users were to say that it was, the target and admin concensus matter more than user concensus. This doesn't mean I agree with Napalm's "Cotton wool" methodology, as that should half the time be provocation against you. Then again, I haven't really seen you use it against any serious accusations, so I might be just falling for a joke. -- Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 03:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not really a methodology, I just think it's completely stupid to wrap people up in cotton wool on the INTERNET. Hey, it's the freaking internet! Grow a backbone and learn to not get butthurt by little arrangements of pixels that should not affect you irl. Sure, it's understandable if you get butthurt and go BAWWWWWWW because of certain things, but they are few and far between. 82.34.128.95 17:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to assume that you just forgot to log in. First, let me take a moment to chuckle at the word "butthurt." I'm going to use that someday. Anyway, before I or anyone responds, I'd like to know what you're referring to by "arrangements of pixels." If it's images, as is the topic of the discussion, I'd find that acceptable given the circumstances (this time). However, if you're steering toward NPA in general, I'd have to say that pixels forming words are just another method of communication, from the first ink applied to parchment to...modern...ink. Wait, did I just potentially apply Deconstruction to your statement? Shit, I think I did. -- Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 17:38, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Damn, I suppose you did! Nice one. Butthurt is a pretty good one though, if you want to research more into it, ED is a good place to look, if you can bear the immaturity. For a general joke, it shouldn't be considered offensive and therefore people should have no reason to get butthurt over it. Even if it's NPA, heck, it's just a few words. If you let every little insult get to you IRL then you're not exactly going to get very far. Also, what Armond said sarcastically is pretty right. Napalm Flame 13:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * NAPALM DEM IMAGES IS 4 SHOKZ I IZ FALLING OFF MAH CHAIR CUZ OF UR PIXLS IT HURTED ME IRL. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 17:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't. Just don't. Search for butthurt. but if you do, search for "pain series", too. -- NUKLEAR  [[Image:User NuclearVII signature 3.jpg|19x19px]] IIV  14:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL pain series ftw. Those don't shock me. I can sit through pain olympics perfectly fine tbh. Napalm Flame 14:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Interesting, I'll have to look that up when I have time. For now, let me take another moment to rage at Dom for making me side with Napalm. Come on! It's Napalm! I had to make a whole archive subpage for his Piplup! It's like making Al Gore side with Big Oil!
 * Naah, I'm kidding. I don't really hold that Piplup thing against you, since there are worse things one could hold over the heads of others. I'm aware that if you really took offense to all that, you would be kind of a hypocrite, but I'm not one for leaving sarcasm to be misinterpreted. Really, though, I don't think NPA is taking it too far, just how some users apply it. -- Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 18:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Meme
Just a small note for clarifying the missuse of the word. Since giving a definition is hard, i prefer to just give the examples: So no... Kougar did not appear in a meme, but appeared in a macro instead. This message was brought to you by the "too much time in imageboards" asociation. --Fighterdoken 22:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Meme: ZOMG, it's a (insert name here), get in the car!.
 * Macro: Image:User Napalm Flame Motivator2.jpg
 * I know, it's a meme in a macro, so I used the meme thing as an excuse. It worked. Napalm Flame 12:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * That's not a macro. That's a so called "image". A macro would be a script that autoposts it. Backsword 14:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Not if you go to facepunch. Napalm Flame 14:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 95% of the people on face punch need to get a life, seriously. --Wolf [[Image:User Great Darkwolf UserImage.jpg|19px| ]] 21:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Facepunch sucks, 4chan ftw. Napalm Flame 16:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * And 100% of dead people need to get a life too, seeing as we're compiling our "people who need to get a life" list. 71.174.250.93
 * Actually, "image macro" would be the correct term to designate the image, but since people is lazy we just call it macro because it's obvious it is an image XD.--Fighterdoken 21:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Napalm Flame 16:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I cbf
logging into wow lately. Two jobs, one of which requires me to wake up at 5 pretty much every day and both of which require several hours of biking and standing, just sap my energy away. -- Armond Warblade 13:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ouch. I'm currently playing a PvP server, sitting here with full s1 and s3 mace raping face with slam DPS. Would have s4 mace but it got removed from server due to bugs. On that note, people used to abuse an EotS bug which allowed them to farm to full s3 and accessories w/enchants and gems within a day. Napalm Flame 12:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Either you're playing on a private server or you really don't have a clue what you're talking about. S1 is no longer available for purchase since Season 4 began; if you had it before then, you still have it now, but I doubt that's the case, as you'd do better to upgrade to buying S2 with honor and marks. S3 and S4 are only available by doing arenas; I really don't see what kind of an EotS bug would get you arena points and rating to let you use S3 things.
 * Also, I really hope you mean the 2h mace, and that you're not just spamming slam for DPS in PvP.
 * -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 17:27, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I mean a pserv where s1 is the cheapest shit you can get, going at about 100 badges of justice for the set. And yes, I mean the 2h mace talent build where you do an attack cycle of autoattack, then as you swing hit slam and then mortal strike for some good dps. Also, in BGs hitting retribution and sweeping strikes when being jumped by multiple melees means you lolrape anyone within range with insane amounts of numbers. Plus pummeling frost mages = gg. Napalm Flame 19:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Arms DPS sucks balls. That's what Fury is designed for. The problem is there's no reason to use Battle Stance, ever, and Recklessness (we both fail at remembering the name) was designed for dual-wielding (which sucks in PvP). Retaliation is the only good thing that comes out of Battle Stance, really, which is a damn shame.
 * But yeah, what build do you run? I usually spec something like this for PvP, taking axes mostly because of my orc racials. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 22:31, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That looks PvE tbh with the prot. Sure, arms is for PvE, but arms DPS is one of the most common builds for PvP. This is my talent build, requires good equips with about 30%+ crit rate on them, but the dps output is good because your normal dps increses hugely, because you time your slams to cast as you take your swing, so both hit almost immediately, and follow with mortal strike for loldps. However, if you find a better PvP build, let me know. Napalm Flame 16:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Napalm McBisexual Edward 17:07, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Who the fuck are you Napalm Flame 18:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * ups Edward 18:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

get ur ass on gw
now!78.20.153.111 17:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

The difference between GWW and PvX
GWW people = bad PvEers.

PvX people = bad PvPers.

Understand? Misery 10:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Not that bad. Well, a bad PvPer is 1,000,000x better than a bad PvEer. Either way, so i herd cedave, ojamo and rawr don't epic fail. 92.232.90.107 10:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

ZZZZZZ
Where the hell did you disappear to QQ.152.226.6.203 02:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * whoru, plus wuts going on? Napalm Flame 15:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)\
 * It's pika, I can't seem to find you online.Pika Fan 15:50, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I got week b& because anet seems to think I hate niggers. Reality is, I FUCKING LOVE NIGGERS! The crazier, the better. Napalm Flame 15:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, that so-called racism fiasco thing? Uptight is uptight, tbh.Pika Fan 16:19, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ino, but hey, I'm going to be calling some decent GvG balanced now. So, tell the guild's frontliners, no more failing at spiking! I'll be fake spiking with bullshit like bulls, and dashing to other monk to realspike, make sure warriors and rangers don't telegraph spiking, ke? If we get off bulls on both monks though, and start steamrolling them, I'll lol. Hard. If guild fails, I'll rage to err7 xP Napalm Flame 16:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * TBH, we need more practice and....well, you should come back on before we decide further tbh, quite a few things happened, so it's best to wait for you to come back online then sort things out. Running decent GvG balanced is the least of our problems atm.Pika Fan 17:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Userpages
If Misery wants a userpage, he's perfectly capable of creating one himself. Further antics on your part will lead to a vandalism block. -- Wyn 16:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Fine, be that way. ¬_¬ --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Napalm Flame (talk).

grrr
stop getting banned, and fuck u i lost my torm shield together with 200k cash/items, I BLAME U !78.20.153.111 17:29, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * ^ur epic fan btw [close] 78.20.153.111 17:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Fail. =)Pika Fan 17:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk about arseholish
2 week ban for 'inappropriate language'. If calling baed players scrubs, nubs and saying 'fuck you hexgay' as we roll an irritating hexspike in GvG is worthy of a ban, then fuck ANet. 82.34.128.19 13:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * INO INO Napalm Flame 13:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yay, so much rating.Pika Fan 17:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * What, our 1005 rating from LOLHEROSMITE with 4 heroes, no holy veil, no RC, lolsplits, lolganks and lolpowerplay? ino, but it looks like we won't be doing that for 2 more weeks, unless ANet GMs decide to stop ruling like nazis, banning me for saying 'fuck' in guild chat and dumb shit like that. Napalm Flame 17:33, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Why did you get banned again.... say those stuff in vent, it seems Anet is watching stalking you.Pika Fan 17:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, do you have hotmail/msn/messenger? I need to talk to you.Pika Fan 17:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, ANet IS stalking me. And yes, I do have msn. gamefreak229@hotmail.com DO NOT email me, I never read, I get too much spam to wade through that shit normally on a daily basis. Napalm Flame 17:41, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Your comment on Noxify's page
Is absolutely uncalled for in any circumstance. -- Wyn 04:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I also checked the history and that was not the first time you trolled his user talk. Stop now. --Xeeron 11:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

My name is Alev.
I'm your biggest fan. Vael Victus  01:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * whoru Napalm Flame 18:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Alev. I'm your biggest fan. Vael Victus  [[Image:User_Vael_Victus_Sig.jpg|18px|Pancakes.]] 19:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Gtfo imo kthxbye Napalm Flame 00:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

y so troll?
^ --Cancer Angel  21:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not a troll. I'm serious. Napalm Flame 21:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * lol good one - Auron 21:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, don't be a dick to people over nothing. Your posts on wyn's talk are way too bitchy for too little effect. Be nice to folks and they'll be more willing to agree with stuff you say. - Auron 01:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Fine, I'll make more of an effort. But srsly, I'm far from trolling, believe it or not. When I troll, I click the little link on my links bar saying '4chan' and then go to the little thing that says /b/. Napalm Flame 02:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You should always take three Stonefist Insignias as each one increases the knockdown duration by one second up to a maximum of three seconds. Misery  07:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah I saw the number he did on Wyn's page and yet you are still here? Way to go...Go back to the Stonefist Insignia Page, now can you spot why Auron ban me for a day? lol have fun.--ShadowFog 19:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * He's still here because I don't act based on personal reasons, that's the difference between me and Auron. While Napalm did violate GWW:NPA on my page, I won't take personal action against him, while Auron feels no need to restrain himself from banning a user who attacks him on a mainspace talk page. It doesn't mean that your 2 hr ban was any less justified than one would have been for Napalm, just a difference in Admin styles. --[[Image:User Wynthyst sig icon.png | Wyn's Talk page]] Wyn 20:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, dang, I forgot that the time here is UTC...so in world's hours...I think that's like 4 hours off... no wonder it said November 18 when I was in November 17 in the ban reason.--ShadowFog 20:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I usually never ban anyone for that short a period, but because it was a personal attack on me, I didn't want to make it a 1 or 3 day ban. - Auron 20:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * What a guy. Vael Victus  [[Image:User_Vael_Victus_Sig.jpg|18px|Pancakes.]] 04:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I know! Don't I rock? - Auron 04:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, you do not rock. I like negated questions. Ɲ oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  04:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * "Do I not rock" and "I do not rock" have completely opposite meanings. I feel dumber for having to post this. - Auron 05:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You verify or falsify the whole question that is to say its proposition forged into facts. The question "Aren't you American?" checks if something or someone is not American. Imagining that the subject you asked is Japanese, it would've had to verify your questions proposition for it is not American. Thus, it has to say "Yes". Because this logic issue causes many problems in your language (and to a lesser extent down here) it is wise to extend the answer by adding an explanation. Using my example it could be "Yes, I am not American.", or even "Yes, you are right, I am not American." The origin of your problem is, that you assume a certain answer by using your question and thus evaluate the answer that follows it with the background of your assumed truth not the possible one. Now, that a question is a mere test of what could be (otherwise a question would be nothing but a rhetorical device in all cases), this is a typical misinterpreting. Only because the use you practiced that is to say beyond said check is very common, the corresponding logical error is not only common but most often accepted as the right one. If you do in-depth research on "Negative question" you will find both sides; the ones that say that you have to answer the whole question (Is not A? Yes, A is not) vs. the ones that say that you must answer what the subject which asked assumed to be (Is not A? No, A is not.). Ɲ oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  12:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Post scriptum: Now, decide if you want to accept that what makes sense or that what is commonly used as truth. This is not a game, I know that most people would not realize the difference and what has to be chosen so I won't even make the effort to persuade you. I just want to show both sides. <font color="#C10000">Ɲ <font color="#000000">oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  13:00, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thats nice. - Auron 13:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL and this guy's an admin? Shit, give me admin, I can ban people all day for hurting my wittle wittle feelings. :'( I'm not very tough, you see, on the internet, so in order to increase my e-peen, I have to ban people who make fun of me. :'( If I was any sort of man I could just defend the claims, but I rather just perform the equivalent of a digital punch to the face. :'( Vael hungry, vael want eat. Vael Victus  [[Image:User_Vael_Victus_Sig.jpg|18px|Pancakes.]] 15:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Eat me, I embrace the pain. <font color="#C10000">Ɲ <font color="#000000">oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  16:29, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, vael, I definitely banned noctarch. He hurt my wittle feewings :(
 * Try to do some homework next time before spouting off in complete ignorance, thanks :) - Auron 02:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Just cuntpunt the fucker imo, job done. Napalm Flame 00:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Which one? Me? <font color="#C10000">Ɲ <font color="#000000">oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  17:53, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Doubt it. You didn't get trolled. - Auron 18:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Wait a second, it wasn't ignorant. Given what you just said up there, saying you banned someone for a personal attack against you, was enough information to prove to me you're a childish admin. You don't get respect by being an admin, you get respect by being a good admin. No one's going to respect you if you just go around acting like a big baby. Do I know your exact history to know how fair and grown-up you can be? No, so you can at least claim my ignorance on the fact I won't be searching through your contribution list, but really, I hereby invoke Godwin's Law upon you. Vael Victus  [[Image:User_Vael_Victus_Sig.jpg|18px|Pancakes.]] 06:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You had no idea what you were talking about, yet you decided to make a claim like I'm a childish admin? Oh, okay. I have every right to call you ignorant if you don't even bother checking block logs before making outrageous claims that aren't supported by the least bit of evidence.
 * I'm not expecting respect for being an admin. I'm expecting people to think before they post. Which, apparently, is too much to ask. - Auron 07:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks to me like someone needs to get their ducks in order. Misery  08:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I just told you based on the information provided (all you really have to say is you banned someone for making fun of you) that you are being childish. You could defend yourself, but you don't. There is no ignorance involved because I wasn't claiming to follow your every action on the wiki, I was merely commenting that doing such things would make you seem childish. Do I know the full story? No, but I don't need to anyway. I'm sure you're a good admin - which is why you're here - just, defend yourself instead of banning people. Good day, sir! Vael Victus  [[Image:User_Vael_Victus_Sig.jpg|18px|Pancakes.]] 05:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * hey bro i heard you like to wear dreary makeup so only the darker people get any joy out of your presence thats not cool bro leave the makeup to the she-bros man Sup brah 05:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh yey, admins cannot post in talkpages and must ban everyone they see, if not, self-deluded people like you will rage QQ emo and /wrists all over the place. Great logic, keep up the idiocy!Pika Fan 06:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It's like a hive. x_x; of trolls. PS: wtf makeup? Vael Victus  [[Image:User_Vael_Victus_Sig.jpg|18px|Pancakes.]] 06:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Apparently, some people are too thick to realise fire spreads until it is too late <3.Pika Fan 12:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Stop making baseless insults. :S That's not how you troll me. You have to find something wrong that I'm doing and bring it up, and I'll probably just admit to it anyway. Just making statements isn't going to affect me, I'm a miniboss on dungeon 2 of the Internet. If you really wanna talk, bring to my talk page. :D Vael Victus  [[Image:User_Vael_Victus_Sig.jpg|18px|Pancakes.]] 16:59, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Wut baseless? Oh yey, admins cannot post in talkpages and must ban everyone they see, if not, self-deluded people like you will rage QQ emo and /wrists all over the place.Pika Fan I'm sure you're a good admin - which is why you're here - just, defend yourself instead of banning people. Good day, sir!Vael Victus Pika Fan 19:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Gaypalm Flamer
&mdash;  Skakid  20:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought it was Gempalm Incinerator... well, thins change. <font color="#C10000">Ɲ <font color="#000000">oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  04:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Facepalm Lamer imo -- Venomoth  13:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Digpalm Holer. Napalm Flame 00:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

lolkisu
Thought you'd get some amusement from the fact that I listened to Casual's vent channel during the game. You should have heard Chop Chop. He was barely holding in some epic rage. You could hear it through his heavy accent. But seriously, did you expect incredible things, even if Casual Love had him guesting? 203.160.118.68 20:26, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually yes, we did xP Owut 17:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

msn
Go on msn asap and stay on it. Got some screens you will love to see.Pika Fan 09:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

J Kougar
scares me. does he scare you? Edit:sign--You Fail 23:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No, he just fails. Napalm Flame 18:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

wtf?
wtf?78.20.153.111 19:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)