User talk:69.182.192.223

Please be aware of the GWW:REDIRECT tags that can be added. Thanks! G R E E N E R 00:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * If I was unclear before, and on the other IP addresses, I am hoping that you add the templates provided. Namely the tag, as you seem to focus on those redirects.  G R E E N E R  06:44, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * To give you an example of what I mean, if you're going to create another capitalization redirect, such as the one at Blessing of the luxons, you can type:
 * If you're still not clear on this, just ask. G R E E N E R  22:47, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * If you're still not clear on this, just ask. G R E E N E R  22:47, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * If you're still not clear on this, just ask. G R E E N E R  22:47, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Hey
I see that you're quite on the defencive when it comes to that quest item page, and though there's nothing wrong with that, try not see all things as a persecution. If I'm correct, your latest post was in reaction to Jon saying, "If it hasn't been done, there hasn't been a need seen by those editors for it." In reality, he was stating a fact in response to your earlier question as to why DPL hadn't been used before to create the page -- Those who know how to use DPL, up to this point, have not seen a need to create this page, and therefore, never created it.

Wyn has offered you suggestions on how to format the page, Jon has offered you an example of what DPL can do, and we have all offered you other pages to visit so that you can try to make this work. Drop the hackles a bit, and maybe that page can exceed all our expectations. We're not bad people, just be aware that text can be interpreted many ways, and assuming the worst isn't the best. G R E E N E R 00:36, 30 October 2010 (UTC)


 * He was stating an opinion, his, which I do not have issue with. What I have issue with (from this and observation of other events by Jon and others) that it seems that the person with the idea should justify why it is a good idea much more often than someone saying what comes across as how I have worded it on the discussion page.  If you don't want things like this to come across that way, then learn how to word them different, or maybe, on the page, make suggestions BEFORE suggesting it get axed.


 * It comes down to the apparent mindset that if the "powers that be" haven't thought of it, then it must not be needed. Bad idea, and a bad way to run things.  69.182.192.223 00:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)