Talk:Orders

Case for deletion
We should buff up the page to a full glossary term (and acknowledge a synonym on the page to which it redirects), change the main article to this one (rather than the current, Orders build), or remove this as a distraction in the search box. I can see arguments in favor of any of the three ideas and have no personal preference. As it stands now, this article mostly serves as an accidental or purposeful double-redirect. — Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 00:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * "What links here" shows articles linking here still. Fix those redirects and then delete. Something being a "distraction" to the search is, btw, a very poor argument for deleting a redirect, since it'll still redirect to the page whether or not its in the search suggestions. -- Konig / talk 01:18, 22 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The argument isn't that the redirect is unused; the argument is that it's unnecessary. If people disagree, then there's no particular need to change redirects on ppl's talk pages. Making things easier to search is exactly one of the reasons that we have redirects; if a redirect makes the search take longer or double-redirect you, then yes, it's a good reason to remove. — Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 02:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Honestly, "Orders build" seems much more awkward than just "Orders" and afaik has been the commonly accepted name for that class of skills. As to the search help, it would be better to have fewer results in the search box, and "Order" vs "Order build" would seem distinct enough, with an "Orders" just mixing things up. Perhaps delete this page, but change the redirect location to "Orders (skill)"? --JonTheMon 02:49, 22 May 2011 (UTC)