Guild Wars Wiki talk:Arbitration committee/2010-02-08-User:Misery

Explanation of my actions
Would anyone actually like one? Misery  21:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. --92.3.45.23 22:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * "Passing off my nomination as vandalism is just petty suppression and an abuse of admin rights." – even if it was an abuse, this would be the wrong location to complain about it. poke | talk 22:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You are right poke, here is my RfA if you would like to request reconfirmation of my adminship status on the basis of an alledged abuse of power. Misery  22:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Any RfA would likely drag out longer than the nomination phase of the elections, thus rendering Misery's obvious attempt at disenfranchising me successful. Kurz Hates Challenge 23:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Arbcomm usually takes even longer. Just saying. Misery  23:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You could just recreate the nomination. [[Image:User_Felix_Omni_Signature.png]]elix Omni 23:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The nomination is rather out of the blue and I can see where Misery might think it is vandalism. Droks has not contributed in two and half years with 23 contributions over a one day timespan. In particular, 12 going to user talk pages, 2 to his user page, and 1 going to the admin noticeboard when he was banned. If it is a valid nomination, as Felix said above, just recreate it. &mdash; Gares 23:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)