ArenaNet talk:Skill feedback/Paragon/Spear Swipe

The daze is conditional upon you being dumb enough to get into melee range (and thus deep into their backline). -- Armond Warblade 22:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Doesn't matter. Warriors and rangers don't have options that good, and no I'm not tanking backlines. There was a paragon actually going into melee range to use spear swipe. But they can afford to do that as they get shields and 80 armor.
 * Like no one uses it, so why nerf it? Misery  12:24, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If he's that deep in your backline, why aren't you collapsing on him? Freezing gust or cripshot (both if you have both), drop shatterstone if you've got it, send your melee on him, focus every bit of damage you can on that guy to punish him for overextending so much. At the very least, you'll burn some of the other guys' energy. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 13:37, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't believe that you would bring both crippling shot AND freezing gust. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:96.233.11.131 (talk).


 * Lame teams do. Note the "if". -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 05:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no reason why one class should have access to unconditional non-elite dazed while others get more expensive conditional elite dazed.
 * It's not like this is maintainable by itself. =\ There is nothing wrong with this skill to warrant a nerf. If you're GvGing and bringing this - you're not winning or losing because of this skill alone. The only place I could possibly see it being a game breaker is TA or RA, but who really brings Paragons there when you could just bring a Ranger with non-elite interrupts and do the same thing? [[Image:User Bathory Spirit to Flesh.jpg|18px]] Bathory   talk  19:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)