User talk:Aliceandsven/Archive 062410-090210

Blocked?

 * "Nicholas was on an extended coin-collecting spree because The Emissary was doing such a good job keeping the wiki free of uncalled for accusations, he wanted to collect extra coins to pay him for his e-heroism."

Erm, was that a reference to being blocked? Were you? (If so, wb.) (And, if I might ask, why?) Thanks &mdash; Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 08:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC) Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә    ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 21:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * - Auron 08:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * haha nice explanation :) -- Nick 123  User Nick123 sig.jpg 11:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * "Reason: Imma big bad opurator"


 * Erm, thanks. That was very illuminating . &mdash; Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 22:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I am Confus Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 2.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 22:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Here is what happened: Talk:War_in_Kryta and then User_talk:The_Emmisary Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 2.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 23:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Classy. – Emmett  03:13, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna ban you bannnnnnnnnnn! Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 2.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 08:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Just like in real life, the biggest dicks always get away with it.  Koda  [[Image:User_Koda_Kumi_UT.jpeg‎|19px]]  Kumi  09:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Joradottir
Got more news about your beloved Jora and her legacy in Guild Wars 2. :D

http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Games/Interviews/gw2_grubb/2.html

Ctrl+F -> Jora --Thalador Doomspeaker 20:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh fuck yeah! This is actually crazy because I've made characters before named so-and-so Joradottir.  What is the proper form of such a name from the language it came from, "Joradottir" or "Jorasdottir"?  And it's even crazier now because we have the Sons of Svanir vs. the "daughters of Jora" perhaps! Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 2.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 22:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * the proper form would be "Joradottir". - Mini Me   talk  10:09, 28 July 2010
 * Take that, Anets. Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 22:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Think it's Norse. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 01:36, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

すし
Holy gods, sushi has invaded my life and is slaughtering all of my peasants and livestock and is currently raping the queen. Whenever I think about sushi I go into hyper-munch mode and I kill myself 10000 times when I don't has any. I recommend Spicy Tuna if you can't get to a good restaurant but IF YOU CAN, see if they have Salmon & Cream Cheese... YES, it's real and it will kill you dead.

Sushi is an elegant munch for a more civilized age. Let's talk about how sushi has ruined our lives!! Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә    ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 01:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)


 * what the fuck alice
 * I thought you were just a bad troll that's managed to avoid getting banned for the past 3420384923 years
 * now you go and talk about how awesome philadelphia rolls are
 * if you can do that you can't be all bad
 * mind blown. stop doing that.
 * -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 09:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Went to Vancouver. Couldn't walk two blocks without seeing a restaurant serving sushi. Fresh tuna is the best, salmon and eel are good. I didn't really like salmon roe or octopus. Had to walk the seawall to burn it all off. &mdash; Gares 12:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm a bit of a sushi newb but it's only because I don't have very many opportunities to go out to a really good restaurant. And is that what they're called, Philidelphia rolls, with the cream cheese?  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 22:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * yeah, they're basically the best thing japan has brought to the western world. next time you're at a sushi place, ask if they have california rolls, they're pretty awesome too. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 01:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool beans! Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 01:06, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * @Gares Tentacles get to me too, so I don't dare to eat "octupus & family" sushi. Pika Fan 02:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL! &mdash;  Raine Valen  [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]] 3:02, 29 Jul 2010 (UTC)
 * I've eaten sea urchin sushi before. Wasn't good (or bad), but the novelty factor was cool.
 * My favorite are unagi. :3 &mdash;  Raine Valen  [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]] 3:02, 29 Jul 2010 (UTC)
 * When you go to certain hibachi-type restaurants and order squid things, they give you mini-tentacles, it's just too weird to eat...  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 07:21, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yakiudon is weird. It's like big noodles with a bunch of other tasty things fried in with it. Sounds great, but then when they serve it to you it's moving. I (and the rest of the table) was all WTF R DIS until we realized they were fish flakes sliced so thin they moved in the steam. But it tasted good! -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 19:41, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL oh wow... Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 21:30, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Typo or intentional?
"As you can see, I love Jora very much. Together we wash some blood and don't afraid of anything."

The "and don't afraid...," is that intended or perchance a typo? Could it be "don't be" or "aren't"? Just wonderin. Also, I love Jora, Anet better give her a whole freakin shrine complete with followers in GW2.--Neithan Diniem 02:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Neithan's a pretty cool guy. He fixes typos and doesn't afraid of anything.  &mdash;  Raine Valen  [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]] 2:21, 29 Jul 2010 (UTC)
 * It is an intentional mispelling, based on an internet meme. Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 07:19, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Home-made Tuna Melts
I need recipes for home-made tuna melts.

No Google is not as loverly as you folks.

Today I just took tuna out of a can (drained it) and two slices of white american cheese... Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә    ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 01:11, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * sounds a plan :) -- Nick 123  User Nick123 sig.jpg 14:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Multi-Weapon Builds
Does anyone have/use builds with multiple weapon specs? I remember doing this when I was still a newb playing AB for the first time. I ran an assassin with attributes in both daggers and bow, a typical chain for daggers and stuff like Hunters/Crippling shot with the bow. I just saw a hammer bar with WIld Throw as an optional (since wars are carrying spears for adrenaline anyway) and it reminded me of the good old days.

I think I'm going to try this again! Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә    ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 19:39, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


 * bb sins
 * /thread
 * -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 05:58, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Wild Throw doesn't need any investment in Spear Mastery to be useful. It's like taking Mending Touch on a ranger, or d-shot on anything. [[Image:User_Felix_Omni_Signature.png]]elix Omni 06:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Sometimes when I piss around in RA I take a ranger with bha and a dagger chain, to jack with the bad synced monks. -- Tha Reckoning User- Tha Reckoning Another Sig.png 06:06, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hammer wars with falling lotus, and HotO. &mdash;  Raine Valen  [[Image:User_Raine_R.gif|19px]] 16:52, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * BB Sins are no secret :D And I'm still not sure if people are just kidding or being honest about bringing d-shot on anything.  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 17:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

They're honest in the fact that D-Shot is one of the best skills in the game. I've used a bow&dag sin in the past. If I remember correctly, it was this:

It probably wouldn't have killed anything if it didn't have D-Shot. :P -~=Ϛρѧякγ  (τѧιк)  17:56, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sometimes I take dshot in my dev hammer optional spot, it's orgasmic. -- Tha Reckoning User- Tha Reckoning Another Sig.png 03:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * That build is awesome. It would be even more awesome if mel's shot wasn't nerfed.  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 05:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Wow look at this
You will cream your diapers

Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә    ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 06:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I really like the GW2 animations so far. They've made the necs look spookier.  -- smøni  06:43, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I think locust swarm is my favorite Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 06:45, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * PS, are Necs and Rits getting combined? I think I read it, and it'd make sense for them to be.  -- smøni  06:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * No idea... Not following the Gamescon stuff since apparently Anet doesn't want us to see it.  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 07:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Blast. I'm sure I read it somewhere.  -- smøni  20:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

hey guys
I'm going to apply for the bureaucracy. If I cite my dedication to reverting vandalism and monitoring recent changes do you think I'd win?? Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә    ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 22:51, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * No, you're not rude enough to be popular. [[Image:User_Felix_Omni_Signature.png]]elix Omni 00:40, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * awwwwwww mannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn 02:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Philosophical Inquiry
If an album of music is pirated in the woods.

And no one is around to notice...

Will a piece of shit moralist still cry? Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ аІiсә    ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 05:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Out of Curiosity
From here. Are there a limited number of sysop positions available? And do you consider "support" to be only given by those who follow a person, or rather was your opposition to those who follow him and also choose to support him? G R E E N E R 08:11, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know how many sysops there are allowed to be. And of course support can be given for a person based on the good they've done.  However you can have someone who is generally good but still not fit to be a leader.  And I'm sure that most of the leaders around here are tied in with friends/fans who will support them no matter what.  I'd rather listen to the people with complaints than all the countless people who can comb through contributions and list good merits.  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 08:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * But when you consider that (some of) the people with complaints are completely out of touch with reality, who do you follow? I mean, complaining about someone doing a poor job as sysop is fine (and I've done it myself on a number of occasions), but complaining about someone's sysopping then being unable to link anything they've done wrong is pointless. I'm wondering if/why you would hold the opinion of those people higher than devout fanbois - neither opinion has very much merit. - Auron 08:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I actually acknowledge the fact that some of those oppositions are baseless or too personal. However this isn't the first time I've noticed people complaining about you.  Anyway what is with the sudden storming of my talk page just because I opposed? Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 08:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, my apologies. Text often gives the wrong impression. I simply was curious. G R E E N E R  08:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It's simply discussing a vote, nobody's trying to storm you or whatnot.
 * I do confess that some who oppose have perfectly valid oppose reasons - Why are we fighting, for example, once opposed and had valid reasons for doing so. But my point is just that those supporting me because they like me and those opposing me because they don't are both equally wrong - that's not how the system is supposed to work. It's supposed to be about how well the sysop has performed.
 * Logic and links are the two best weapons for either side on a RfA. A reasoned post instead of simply a signature goes quite a ways to garnering more support or oppose, and a reasoned post followed by links that actually show support of one's argument is about the best a user can do voting on a RfA. A half-legible rant followed by links to sysops making movie references is not in any way beneficial to the process. An oppose vote that says "because some people have disliked this sysop in the past" is only very slightly more valuable. I'm not expecting you to magically support or go neutral, but if you want it to have significant meaning, I would suggest you dig up a little bit of actual evidence of any wrongdoing. It's totally optional, but you want to be heard, right? This is your chance. - Auron 09:27, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but no, I won't be heard. If you believe this is some kind of fair podium for anyone to go on and voice their opinion, go to archive 3 and check out what KJ has to say about anyone who opposes.
 * "No one respects their opinion" - this is because we are not a part of the circle that consists of all those "bigname" folks. The very fact that this is a vote based system completely destroys anyone's opinion, even if it's golden and full of logic and evidence and what not.
 * I'm not even sure why you started the RfR, can you honestly say that you'll be surprised if you are reconfirmed? If it was community request then why doesn't the community post it?  Are they allowed to?  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 09:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, not everyone has the time to dig in your huge list of contribs to fish for what you call "evidence".  Koda  [[Image:User_Koda_Kumi_UT.jpeg‎|19px]]  Kumi  09:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * And there is now a talk page for this most recent RfR. You might also want to take a look at my opposing opinion again, it doesn't say anything close to "i've hurd it so its must be true"  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 09:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, you may be interested in my opinion of your vote as I am one of the people who will make a decision based upon them. At the moment your vote consists of two parts, the first part criticises a support vote. It isn't actually anything opposing Auron at all. The second part seems to imply there is a limit on the number of sysops and Auron remaining a sysop will mean that someone more deserving will not be a sysop. This is incorrect, there is no limit on the number of sysops. Auron being a sysop will not prevent anyone else from becoming one. Perhaps in the first part you are also accusing Auron of telling Raine to support him and maybe that is the reason you are opposing. That accusation would be fairly baseless. So at the moment you have provided an incorrect reason and possibly made a baseless allegation. That isn't really a very convincing vote. Let us contrast this with Koda Kumi's vote. While he doesn't provide any evidence of what he is saying, he does actually provide a reason for his opposition, and that reason is actually reasonably easily confirmed. You may want to improve your vote to be more like Koda's if you want your opinion to count. Of course you could continue to talk about how unjust the system is and point out how bad everyone else's votes are if you prefer, it doesn't really bother me at all. Misery  09:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Or you could even go to the RfR discussion page. Although I am slightly amused at this assault of my talk page with walls of text.  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 10:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It was relevant to the discussion here and directed at you. But feel free to react in whatever manner you wish. Misery  10:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * A discussion that was the result of "why the fuck are you opposing me, peasant?" Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 10:05, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't believe that makes my comments irrelevant. Misery  10:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * And why is it wrong to include in my opinion the concern that Auron's support comes from popularity rather than critical and objective judgment? Have you actually looked at some of the supports?  There I addressed your silliness.  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 10:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It isn't wrong, it just isn't a reason to oppose him. At the moment your vote is about as valid as their votes. I am suggesting that you improve your vote for your benefit. I am able to tell the difference between a vote with reasoning and a vote that is just a signature and weigh them appropriately. Perhaps you feel I mad the wrong decision last time Auron went through an RfA. If you go look at that, 4 people opposed him, 2 provided reasons. 42 supported him. Not all of them provided reasons, but far more than 2 did. At the moment I perceive one opposing vote with a reason versus two supporting votes with reasons. I'm not going around and suggesting that all of the people who voted poorly in support to improve their votes I know, but that doesn't mean I am accepting them as valid votes. This was a courtesy, a courtesy that you are welcome to ignore and subsequently have your vote ignored, or at least weighted with less value than you would like. Feel free to continue calling my actions silly though. Misery  10:19, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * We are all very silly people, you will be happier if you accept this! Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 11:23, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Democracy doesn't work (look at the state of the US government if you'd like some living evidence). It inevitably leads to giving the power of decision to the ignorant, fearful, and least-useful sections of the society which seeks to be governed (I'm not sure if you're going to get the less-than-subtle implication here, so I hope this makes it perfectly clear). Organizations run best when broad-reaching powers of authority are given to a select group of proven individuals who are then moderately monitored by a group other than the community at large to prevent corruption. Tl;dr the wiki works better when give more power to people like Auron and stop listening to ignorant schmuks like you. Cheers. Jake--168.122.167.202 15:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I know all of this, old news. I wouldn't be such a miserable person if the world was any different and if humans weren't so miserable themselves.  Now maybe you should get back on your knees and continue sucking some elite-cock, as you're wasting that precious time by coming here and calling me a schmuck... LOL wow.  Are we back in the 70's or something?  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ  аІiсә  [[File:User Aliceandsven 3.png]]  ѕνәи  Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 19:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)