Talk:Weapon of Quickening

self target?
can it? Briar 23:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)briar
 * Yes. Skills that cannot self-target specify "target other ally" in the description, rather than just "target ally". Omnidon 23:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

...shouldn't this speed up casting times of spells? ...makes sense IMO, and it would make it a much more appealing skill.--70.121.145.76 21:48, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. While better recharge times are nice with certain builds, faster cast times are much more useful. It would be harder to balance that however (FC Monks...). Elu 21:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Healer's Boon. --  euphoracle  |  talk  18:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * flare78.20.153.111 18:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

this seems to be a reference to highlander, worth making a note about it? 86.157.197.73 20:05, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Or it could refer to the fact that it quickens the recharge of skills, but I suppose that would just be way too easy. ne shot  17:59, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

It's own casting time
I think 2 secs is too long for this ELITE. --195.181.32.133 08:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If interrupted, it comes back in 5 seconds. It's fine.-- User Vanguard VanguardLogo.png anguard  00:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Problem is, it does not. Also 10 energy are quite hefty. Nonetheless, the drawbacks are needed as this is the only ally-targeted recharge reductor. Ɲ oɕʈɋɽɕɧ  00:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea, I think it's fine.-- User Vanguard VanguardLogo.png anguard  00:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * IMO 10[[File:Tango-energy.png]] 1[[File:Tango-activation-darker.png]] 10-15[[File:Tango-recharge-darker.png]] would be somewhat fair. Shorter casting, but a bigger gamble for recharges if it's interrupted. --Kenny7220 23:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I prefer it the way it is. There are alot of ways to counter a d shot, blocking blinding standing behind stuff etc. otherwise there shouldn't be a problem, especially pve. 114.77.98.223 10:44, 21 January 2011 (UTC)