Guild Wars Wiki talk:Projects/NPC models/Core and multi-campaign

Xunlai
Are there any male xunlai agents left in the game? I haven't found any, thought they were all removed not too long ago. -- Lemming64 19:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Is that first Xunlai model meant to have Fangfa Tai in the list? And I'm not sure about them being in game anymore. I know with the first update, they were renamed, not sure what happened when all the chests got moved and changed into npcs. - B e X   02:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I also haven't seen any male Xunlai Agents, so I assume they were all taken out. Fangfa Tai actually has a different face than the male Xunla Agents. He doesn't have the beard and moustache. Tedium 02:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I was asking why his name was next to the picture of the lady... lols ^_^ If the male ones have been removed, then it's likely the second model is being unused. - B e X  [[Image:User BeXoR sig.gif|iawtc]] 02:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Concept art vs render
render wins every time imo. Better quality image and probably more up to date, I know some concept art shows npc's wearing armor that does not match the final game release. -- Lemming 20:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree that renders should be used as the main image in the infobox, but I think that concept art should be incorporated into the article if possible. -- Gordon Ecker 22:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I think having a concept art image thumbnailed under the infobox would be alright, as long as there aren't too many images, in which case you could always use gallery. - B e X  [[Image:User BeXoR sig.gif|iawtc]] 05:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed. -- Gordon Ecker 05:43, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion
Can we get rid of this, or do we need it for legal reasons? Backsword 08:42, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm quite happy for this page to be deleted, but maybe we should preserve talk page. I'm not sure about the legal ramifications. --Indecision 11:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I think as long as all contributors voice their support we can delete it without a problem. I am fine with deleting it. -- Lemming [[Image:User Lemming64 sigicon.png]] 16:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I vote get rid of it -- Primeval Sentinel  [[Image:User Primeval Sentinel user icon.jpg|19px]]  Talk  02:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Rather klunky if we need to this everytime we want a page deleted. SHall try to not copy anything in the future to avoid this.


 * For this one we still need Gordon and Tanetris. Backsword 08:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure, but I think the talk page would need to be retained to provide proof that we okayed the merge. -- Gordon Ecker 09:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Fine by me. - Tanetris 19:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)