User talk:Shard/Fail

Wail of Doom isn't that bad since you can block it with Hex Breaker or remove it. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:96.233.11.131 (talk).
 * Blockable, removable, doesn't make it any less broken. Backbreaker could have been blocked, and yet ANet nerfed it because it was broken with sins. --[[Image: User_Ezekial_Riddle_sig.jpg|Talk]] Riddle 13:37, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I liked that last comment on Shattering Assault ;-). Humor like this, without mentioning something bad about Izzy or GW in general, is a refreshing change. | Foul Bane | 17:05, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

...I'm going to be completely straightforward with this, your logic is HORRIBLE on many of these. You know why all those duplicate skills were made? So new gw players could have all the same abilities as people who started in '05, and that seems pretty logical to do, doesn't it? Ill admit, dup skills along with more new skills would've been nice, but that isn't the case.--Ra ph  Tal ky  00:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That has nothing to do with the point I was trying to make. Izzy doesn't know his own game.  ~Shard  [[Image:User Shard Sig Icon.png]] 00:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with everything you said cept the gimmicks part. I think gimmicks are okay as long as they aren't overpowered and don't give novice players enough advantage to beat more skilled players. (ie: EoE bomb is a cool gimmick but if the enemy team is smart, you're gonna get owned. It was a fairly balanced gimmick because you either won by your enemy team being stupid or you lost because the enemy team wasn't bad.). Tho unfortunately Izzy thinks all gimmicks are okay, which includes RaO, etc, just sayin'. DarkNecrid 13:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)