Template talk:Npc infobox

I think this redirect would actually have been quite useful. Even if one doesn't agree with that, not sure why it was R2'd, considering that's only for the most obvious of unnecessary redirects, i.e. those with no potential use. -- pling 20:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Still, trying to use "Npc infobox" and then noticing that it's a red link easily tells the editor that the name is wrong. It's NPC not Npc after all... poke | talk 20:14, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, but if someone tried to use "npc infobox" and we had it redirect, they wouldn't see anything wrong. They'd be able to carry on adding their content, improving the format, or whatever. Saves some effort, however small. Isn't that what redirects are partially for? -- pling User Pling sig.png 20:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * ... and they would continue to write "Npc" :P poke | talk 20:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * ..so? -- pling User Pling sig.png 20:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)