Feedback talk:User/Zerpha The Improver/Miniature Box

Another suggestion based on this one
wow that looks cool! just wondering do you mind if i add another view or suggestion to your area? instead of making a new page/thread Chessyang 16:30, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * i'm glad you like it. what exactly do you want to add? i already had the same problem as you as well, since i'm unsure whether it makes sense to start a proposal with the same concempt yet with different arguments or even ideas. but then again changing a proposal of someone within that person's namespace souldn't be done. i simply wrote my supplements on the accordant talk page so far. &mdash;Zerpha[[Image:UserZerpha The Improver sig.png|talk]] The Improver 18:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, according to my understanding, that is the very purpose of the talk pages of the suggestions. For everybody to give their own opinions of the suggestion and fine tune the suggestion.  --Musha [[Image:User_Musha_Sigc.png|19x19px]] 23:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * well that depends. as i said, people might either just bring up some further suggestions to make realization possible (fine tuning), or they have the same concept but want to see realization in a different manner. you might don't exctly get what i mean, but you apparently thing the same way: regarding this suggestion of yours for instance, it's a "Miniature Keeper à la Hatmarker", based on this one, which uses the same concept but (in my opinion) a pretty disputable realization. &mdash;Zerpha[[Image:UserZerpha The Improver sig.png|talk]] The Improver 21:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * oh after reading it a few more times i think you hit all the points. i was just thinking of a quest to get it. but you hit most of the points --Chessyang 16:39, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Asura toymaker
An Asura toymaker. That's priceless. Great idea. I'm kinda raising an eyebrow at the 100 skill points, but the whole of your idea is great and well thought out. --Ravencroft0 10:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you like the toymaker idea :) The 100 skill points are just another thought i included in my proposal (with pro's and con's) since i thought it would suit there. It's basically just a twist in the item cost, so if needed it could be left out easily. &mdash;Zerpha[[Image:UserZerpha The Improver sig.png|talk]] The Improver 23:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Summonable pets via command
Definitely a YES here from me, GW1 needs to receive a way to reduce for players the storage space that is beign full for those of use, who like to collect as much as possible minipets.

But I'd improve the suggestion here and go so far to say, that each Minipet should be "summonable", once a player has dedicated it to the account. Means once you dedicate a minipet to your HoM, that the dedicated minipet will become then for your summonable by using two different commands in the chat line:

/sum_ooze would for example result now in summoning your Ooze Minipet. Do you use now then

/putback_ooze and your minipet will disappear.

This way we don't need then anymore to have the minipets in our inventory, but once we dedicated the minipet, we can simple DELETE it and summon it then per chat command whenever we want. (Phoenix Tears 15:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC))
 * That defers significantly from my suggestion, but that's also an interesting concept for handling the mini pet storage space. Although this would make dedicated minipets even less valuable since those players which don't care for their HoM will also start dedicating minipets to save storage space and get rid of the these (since there is no reason for you to keep them anymore once you unlocked the command). &mdash;Zerpha[[Image:UserZerpha The Improver sig.png|talk]] The Improver 15:11, 23 December 2010 (UTC)