Guild Wars Wiki talk:Elections/2008-04 bureaucrat election/Tanetris

maybe put link to last time's nomination. (saves a three-page-long essay on why)--Sum Mesmer Guy 06:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm unsure of the location of that, Sum. Could you link it here?  Since this is at the top of the talk page it'll still get good notice.  MiraLantis 06:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * found it Guild Wars Wiki:Elections/2008-02 bureaucrat election/Tanetris and Guild Wars Wiki talk:Elections/2008-02 bureaucrat election/Tanetris--Sum Mesmer Guy[[Image:User sum mesmer guy signiture.png‎|19px]] 06:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. MiraLantis 06:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

You have my vote Tanetris :o) -- Shadowphoenix   15:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Tanetris, I wanted to give you a heads up. No, you are not (yet) my first choice in this election, but I feel you have come a long way. When you first candidated I thought about you, much like I think about, lets say Sum Mesmer Guy now. Someone without a big impact on the wiki, proposing himself for some quick fame/whatever. You quite definitely proved that wrong by sticking in there for the long run and being consistently active in the relevant areas on the wiki. You are a great example of a "new guy" doing the right thing and getting the deserved positive reputation in the end. --Xeeron 22:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm honestly not sure where I stand on this nomination yet, but I will say this. Tanetris is, in my estimation, one of the few Sysops (no offense to the others, this is merely anecdotal) willing to use his administrative discretion when he believes it is in the best interest of the Wiki, and as a Sysop, he's a force to be reckoned with. While I certainly believe that this is a great trait for Bureaucrat as well, I hesitate to support Tanetris (though I think he'd make an excellent Bureaucrat) if it means that the Sysop team will lose Tanetris' valuable contributions. *Defiant Elements*  +talk  23:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, it's that "cross-between-TetrisL-and-Tanaric" guy. I like him ;) -- Snog  rat  23:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Support
why not?--Ra ph  Tal ky  00:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Tanetris has a level head, is a great admin, and would make an awsome bcrat. Not much more to be said about it. -- Shadowphoenix   15:31, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It wasn't too long ago that you would have requested his reconfirmation. Can I ask what's changed? --[[Image:User Brains12 Spiral.png|15px|Pling! \]] Brains12 \ Talk 15:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, well I have actually interacted with Tanetris on the wiki (and in-game a few times), and have noticed more and more that he would be a great bcrat. As for GWW:NOTICE yeah, I got your points on that; I noticed what happens when it gets spammed (got on my watchlist, don't know why though :S) and if it is annoying to me how many times it pings my watchlist, I can only imagine how it is to an admin :P -- Shadowphoenix   [[Image:User Shadowphoenix Necromancer.png|19x19px|Please, talk to me; I'm so lonley ;-;]] 15:40, 21 April 2008 (UTC)