User talk:67.234.26.214

Since it would be imprudent to revert again, and since I really don't think that would be best both because of 1RR and your point in the discussion, I just wanted to tell you here that it would have been more prudent of you to leave your reasoning on the talk page before doing the removal. Helps to sort out the vandals, as have been seen in the history several times. Which should help you know why we're "interested in reverting." -- Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 01:14, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I know. I kind of panicked after realizing I never gave a summary of my revision and I knew it would make a huge difference. Sorry about that. 67.234.26.214 01:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That's fine, then. Just keep in mind in the future that it's a wonder we haven't protected the assassin page, due to the number of vandals, so we (well, I don't really speak for others, so at least I) may be a little paranoid in dealing with that page in particular. Nevertheless, quite a good writing for your point; I especially liked the bit about not giving "new sins the wrong idea", as they're already misguided enough stereotypically. -- Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 01:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)