Template talk:UserpageVio

Removed doesn't sound too damn polite, if you know what you mean. Oppose template. B LASTED T 17:27, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

I also don't like this template at all. We finally got rid of  , and now here comes this? A message on the Talk page of that person will do the job just fine, since in pretty much most cases the violations of GWW:USER will come from the editors simply not being aware of its existence. Strongly opposed to this template as well. --Dirigible 17:32, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

I agree, I've added a delete tag to it, if anyone thinks It should be spared I'd like to hear the reasons but other than that I see it as being utterly pointless. -- Scourge   18:07, 27 March 2007 (EDT)


 * I agree with the deletion and I deleted it. If someone wants to defend it, feel fre to do so. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 19:00, 27 March 2007 (EDT)