Talk:Paladin

Deletion
I'm opposed to deletion, the term isn't as common as wammo, but it is used. -- Gordon Ecker 03:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Never heard this term refer to wammos in my life.-- [[Image:User_Vanguard_VanguardLogo.png|19px]] anguard  03:28, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I would agree with Vanguard. The only times I have ever heard the term used in GW is when it was used to compare GW warriors to paladins in other games. --[[Image:User Wynthyst sig icon.png | Wyn's Talk page]] Wyn 03:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Wasn't there a pre-made pvp build at one point called the Paladin? And wasn't it just a Healing Hands W/Mo? So, if this article is retained, I would redirect it to wammo. However, as the build is discontinued and there is no other reference to Paladin in the game, I say delete. --JonTheMon 03:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yea, there was. It had mending. Don't think it had healing hands, but I don't remember it that well.  &not; Wizårdbõÿ777  ( talk ) 04:03, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It did. I remember playing it in AB :/ -- [[Image:User Brains12 Spiral.png|18px|]] Brains12 \ talk 15:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I've heard of it as well but very rarely and long ago, so it's probably not necessary anymore. A redirect to wammo and then mentioning this in that article might be a better way to handle this. -- ab.er. rant [[Image:User Ab.er.rant Sig.png| ]] 01:44, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * So, turn into a redirect or delete? --JonTheMon 03:43, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect methinks. If nothing else, might stop one or two new players from rolling wammo as their first char.--Ryudo 03:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)