Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Lemming64

Lemming64
This request is for the reconfirmation of User:Lemming64 (talk &bull; contribs).

The old RFA and the requests leading to this reconfirmation can be found at Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Lemming64/archive1.

Created by &mdash;Xeeron 11:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Candidate statement
By now most of you know who I am and what I am about, this reconfirmation has arrived due to a couple of disagreements with other users in the past about interpretation of policy. I am not going to try and persuade anyone that I should stay as admin, I believe everybody who knows who I am already has made a decision to that effect, and will post here as they see fit. I would however very much like to stay on as an admin and will continue to do the hard work of combating vandals and making the wiki a better place to be should you support my reconfirmation, Thanks! -- Lemming 13:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Status
Successful. 21:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Support. I've always found lemming64 to work in the best interests of the wiki as a whole and thus has my support and faith. -- Salome 13:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Tanaric et al will have to point some major event that I've managed to miss if I'm going to not support. I can't remember anything L64 have done that stands out from the general group of sysops. Backsword 14:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. While number of contributions may mean nothing, the log is always a good way to see how active a sysop is. Even if the last days have gone slow, i think there is enough activity as to support the reconfirmation.--Fighterdoken 22:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Support. huh? poke | talk 22:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Support. He's always been a good sysop. No need to end a good thing. Eyes 23:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Support. Balance out stupidity - FireFox  [[Image:User_FireFox_av.png]] 23:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Support. Unless someone can post something where he's made some extremely poor decisions of late, then I see no reason to end his adminship. Kokuou 23:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Support I have not seen any issue where a reconfirmation is warranted. Even in the requests for it that were noted, no specific examples were provided. --[[Image:User Wynthyst sig icon.png |Go to Wynthyst's Talk page]] Wynthyst 00:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) Support good sysop- Insane Maestro [[Image:User Insane Maestro Sig.png‎|19px]] 01:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) Support I haven't seen any issues that would cause me to oppose his reconfirmation.  He does a good job as sysop and should continue in the role. -- Kakarot  [[Image:User_Kakarot_Sig.gif|Talk]] 02:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) Support As Kakarot said, I haven't seen anything that would cause him not to be reconfirmed.  Give some examples and I'm sure we'll analyze them -- People of Antioch  talk [[Image:User People of Antioch sig.png]] 03:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) Support. No reason to change my original support. -- Snog  rat [[Image:User Snograt signature.png]] 10:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 13) Support. I see no reason to oppose as I trust Lemming with handling the admin tools. &mdash; Galil [[Image:User Galil sig.png|Talk page]] 15:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) Support I've never seen him do anything wrong. --Sum Mesmer Guy[[Image:User sum mesmer guy signiture.png‎|19px]] 21:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 15) Support. Seems like he'll be useful and not a problem. --Rezyk 07:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 16) Support. I have no reason to not trust Lemming. -  anja  [[Image:User Anja Astor sig icon.png|talk]] 14:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 17) Support. Lemming64 is a great help to the wiki community. I see no problems with him, he deserves to be an admin. He has been no trouble to anyone, why take away his adminship? --Burning Freebies 20:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose. hell no --Cursed Angel [[Image:User Cursed Angel Signature.jpg|19px|talk]] 14:03, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I don't trust his ability to use discretion. He's basically just another carebear sysop - we've got about fifty of those already, but most of the other ones can at least make decisions on the fly. - Auron  05:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Neutral. Been here for a few months and I still haven't seen that much contribution by Lemming. A comment here and there but nothing solid. If I can get some proof of deeds I might reconsider, if possible.-  Vanguard [[Image:User-VanguardAvatar.PNG]] 14:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Neutral Following Vanguard's lead, but I've seen Lemming contribute, but not so much so in discussions.  Calor  [[Image:User_Calor_Sig.png|19px|Talk]] 20:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Neutral I think I am not active enough to have a solid opinion. But I want to say hi to everyone, =P -- Coran Ironclaw 22:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Neutral. While I find myself agreeing with Tanaric and the others, after reconsidering my vote, I don't think I know Lemming well enough to oppose his reconfirmation. [[Image:User Defiant Elements Sig Image.JPG|19x19px]]  *Defiant Elements*   +talk  04:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Neutral eeeek Im not sure --Shadowphoenix [[Image:User-Shadowphoenix Shadow Phoenix Signet.jpg|19px]] 05:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Neutral. I'm leaning more on the neutral side now. &mdash;  ク  Eloc  貢  17:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Neutral. I have no feelings one way or another about this sysop, but I'm glad this reconfirmation pointed out a ridiculous part of our adminship policy. &mdash;Tanaric 15:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)