User talk:76.25.197.215

Please do not post antagonistic messages on other users' talkpages, regardless of whether you believe the user in question to be harmful to the wiki or not. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 07:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey Aiiane, can you post antagonistic messages here so we can get really recursive? --76.25.197.215 07:58, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Stop reverting Relinquished and discuss it on the talk page with him. You accomplish nothing by senselessly reverting. Calor  03:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * He's deleting discussion. As far as I'm concerned, he can go sit on a cock. --76.25.197.215 03:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Additionally, personal attacks are not accepted on this wiki. Backsword 08:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The fan-child bit? Would you prefer fan-thing, or maybe fan-it?  Because I'm not going to specify a gender, and fan-person lacks the bile I felt necessary to respond to someone suggesting vampires be added. --76.25.197.215 08:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No. You simply do not address the person, you address the issue. Backsword 09:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Would "Absurd, addled, anserine, asinine, blockish, bovine, brainless, cloddish, crass, cretinous, dimwitted, doltish, dopey, dull, dumb, fatuous, foolish, hebetate, idiotic, ignorant, imbecilic, imperceptive, inane, insensate, irrational, loutish, moronic, oafish, obtuse, oscitant, pointless, purblind, senseless, silly, simple, stultifying, stupefying, torpid, unintelligent, unwise, vacuous, witless, and worthless." be more acceptable? --76.25.197.215 09:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Actualy I fixed your intends and not "fucked". --M age M ontu 00:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The indent you added implied I was replying to 8765, which I wasn't. Therefore, "fucked". --76.25.197.215 00:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Well not my fault that you used his topic. --M age [[image:user MageMontu sig.png| ]]M ontu 00:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * What topic? There was no header.  I didn't see the need to add a header since I was talking about the same thing as he was.  We were both talking to the devs, not each other. :/ --76.25.197.215 00:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Isaiah Cartwright
Please do not post non-constructive comments on that page; the Dear Izzy section has been removed twice now. -- Brains12 \ talk 22:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * What would constructive be? "Dear Izzy, as the current tiebreaker shafts teams with good monks so hard it isn't funny, may I suggest these alternatives: (blahblahblah)"? --76.25.197.215 22:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know, I'm not entirely sure what the issue is. In any case, suggestions or balancing issues don't belong there; use the the ArenaNet portal to find the appropriate place if you do make it somewhat constructive. --[[Image:User Brains12 Spiral.png|18px|]] Brains12 \ talk 22:45, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The issue is the current tiebreaking scheme in arenas: if nobody's died by the time the timer runs out, both teams lose, which is absurd. And I wasn't sure that this belonged there, which is why I put it on Izzy's page.  I'll post there about it. --76.25.197.215 22:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Hai
Grinch? -- Armond Warblade 02:29, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 71. :> --76.25.197.215 03:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * What'd you do to your IP? It's, like, self-mutilation. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:User Armond sig image.png]] 05:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Different internet tbh. Still got the 71.229.***.*** one. :> --76.25.197.215 17:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)