Talk:Zaishen Order

lol they know how to get to hoh and stuff... then how the hell do their builds suck so bad?? 98.221.120.211 01:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Members
Aren't the hostile npc's members aswell?--Markisbeest 14:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed they are. You see, that's why they're still under ==Memsers==, they're under a sub-section under that section. They're simply under a second table in order to prevent confusion between the two. -- Konig / talk 14:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Reorganize

 * I propose reorganizeing them By Rank (or Status/Job) & By Location, such as GtoB, IotN, MK, EB, PVP-outposts, Non-core putposts. --Falconeye 04:03, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * We don't need to have them listed twice (as that's what it seems you're suggesting). TBH, I don't think any of the NPCs in Embark Beach that are listed are actually of the Zaishen Order (Ahjek looks Elonian and his dialogue implies being an adventurer from there; likewise the Sworns specifically mention hearing what the Zaishen are doing and decided to see for themselves - which heavily implies not being part of the Zaishen Order; Ra definably is though). Also, I don't think that we need to list every single NPC of the order - that's what categories are for. I say list: 1) the important (what's now "High Council" and "Officers") and the generic (some of the "Other"). -- Konig / talk 04:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Now it looks cleaner; I just didnt like how the entire bar was being squished together on smaller screens; I followed Sunpears' page example and moved units to tabs that can only be found in certain outposts. ^_^ --Falconeye 21:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Cleaner, but unnecessarily large. Again, we do not need to mention every single NPC like the table is doing. In fact, for consistency sake, it should only list generic NPCs. -- Konig / talk 06:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC)