User talk:Tub

You're being too broad in your strategy clean up. --JonTheMon 16:55, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

You can keep on cleaning those strats up, just try to be a bit more.... encompassing with what you leave behind. --JonTheMon 17:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I had added my reasoning before editing in the Augury Rock Talk page, and just now added a reasoning why I did as I did. If you disagree with any of those, please let me know.

Faction points
You mention 50 pts per kill, when it is lower; 10 NM 20 HM per kill.MystiLefemEle 13:26, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * That's the points of the Blessing, you gain an additional 50 points per foe after vanquishing as mentioned in Vanquisher. Tub 13:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * "In Guild Wars Factions, vanquishing an area in the Echovald Forest or the Jade Sea will respectively earn Kurzick faction or Luxon faction equal to 50 times the number of monsters killed." not 50 pts per kill, which would be and is misleading.MystiLefemEle 13:46, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't quite understand what's wrong with my wording. Are you saying that the current wording suggest that the points are awarded when a monster is killed instead of at the end (as they are?)
 * I've choosen the wording as it is because it's short and fits into the table headers even on lower screen resolution. If you know a different wording that's more accurate, yet concise enough to fit into the table headers, please let me know. We could also solve this by talking a bit about Bonus Points in the introduction. Tub 13:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * For anyone, at first glance, they see 50 points per kill, when it is not and the current 50 per kill is redundant, since it is and already has been noted in the respective notes section. The previous version, simply stated that Echovald Forest was for Kurzick and Jade Sea for the Luxon Faction.  Perhaps, simply stating the approprate faction, with out # per kills for the area awarded.  As for the clarification to bonus points in the itroduction, perhaps, or a direction to the page(s), which is already done. with a clarification on the respective blessing page(s) needed as well.MystiLefemEle 14:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Again, thank you for your feedback. I've restructured the introduction paragraph and added the faction rewards. I'll wait if someone objects/reverts, but will add another edit to shorten the table notes to "Bonus Points are Luxon Faction" later. If you have further criticism or suggestions, please continue the discussion on the article's talk page so we can get some more opinions. Tub 16:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Looks good now, thank you.MystiLefemEle 09:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Double the fun?
This was a more sensible edit than mine. Thanks. &mdash; Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 23:35, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for editing in the first place, if only to remind me that the article needs work. ;) I feel a bit guilty about removing most of your changes; I'm glad you agree with the edit. I've done some more editing, if you disagree with anything or see room for further improvements, edit ahead! Tub 00:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
for the link. I just copy&pasted from another quest that had the dialogue before the walkthrough w/o even considering format. D= Sardaukar  17:54, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * no problem. Sorry for reverting your whole edit, I didn't look closely enough to spot the added dialogue. Tub 18:00, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Passage scrolls and EB
They cannot be used even when traveling alone? Or only when some people in the party haven't yet unlocked the destination outpost? Or...? Regardless, thanks for doing the testing and updating the articles. — Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 00:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Like UW/FoW-scrolls, they don't work there at all. I was a party of one when I tried to use the scroll. Hence I did not check whether they actually transport your whole party now.
 * And thanks for all your work on the wiki. It seems like one only needs to make a little fix, and five minutes later you've patrolled Recent Changes and rewritten half of the article. ;) Tub 01:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * That's a compelling test; it's too bad (it would be nice to avoid having to travel EB/GToB &rarr; KC &rarr; Cavalon/HzH &rarr; Deep/Urgoz).


 * And thanks for the compliment. — Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 01:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Infobox changes also affected...
The changes to the quest infobox also affected the Template:Quest list table. I tried manually updating the cat lists in the various, but I suspect it's probably better long term if we can fix the QLT template so that it recognizes subcategories. (Or not, depending on what is required in the relevant article.) Any thoughts on how to make that happen? If not, we can manually add the subcats. — Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 19:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Suppose that happens when you blindly follow konig's advice and meddle with categories. I've reverted that specific change, any pre-beyond quests should be back to their old categories now. Tub 20:08, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Cool. Thanks for the quick fix. — Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 20:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Quick request
Since I don't know the wiki magic of infobox templates (and every attempt I've made to duplicate with minor alterations turns into a "screwing up the entire template" scenario), I was hoping you can perform this little rather-required feature to the NPC infobox. Preferably as part of any changes to consistencize it with the quest infobox.  Konig / talk 03:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Apparently Balistic has done the change already. Tub 08:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, guy's fast when it comes to stuff brought up on others' talk pages. Also, thanks for fixing that. I apparently read it "of" rather than "in"  Konig / talk 09:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)