Feedback talk:User/Husband King/Player Cities&Single Char Realm

I think this is a brilliant idea and I was just about to post something similar to this. Player/Guild owned cities would be amazing.


 * Not the first time someone has made this suggestion, and its not going to be the last. While it sounds like a good idea (and to a degree, it honestly does), you gotta ask yourself, where is this stuff going to go?  The in-game map is finite; there is only going to be some much land.  We have been told that players get a "home instance" where they'd live, and I'd imagine there would be some degree of customization to it, I don't see entire castles or towns being possible to build.  I can't even imagine what a nightmare that could be for the developers.  As for your second suggestion, well, it sounds a little bit like instancing from GW1, but not really at all.  If that WAS what your going for, it'll need to be re-worded.  If its not, well, for one thing there isn't going to be enough servers for each of the player in the GW2 community.  It also would turn the game into a single player like Oblivion, which is just not what GW2 is meant to be.  Its an MMO, a game for people to play together.  If you don't like that idea...well, maybe you should find a different game.--Will Greyhawk 00:39, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Will his second suggestion is actually that the a server not allow accounts to have more than one character in that server, I found what he meant relatively clear, but it actually sounds like a good idea, if unlikely to be actually implementedIndigo121 22:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC).