Template talk:Attribute nav

Is this ok?
As the Articles i wanted to tag with this template are a bit more important this time, i wanted to ask if that'd be ok... I thought about making a navbox for every class seperately at first, but those got a bit tiny...and i think this box is better as well. &mdash;Zerpha The Improver 23:48, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This stretches off the page for me (1280x1024) --[[Image:User Brains12 Spiral.png|15px| ]] Brains12 \ Talk 23:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * oh...no good. can this be changed somehow, maybe by setting the font size smaller? &mdash;Zerpha[[Image:UserZerpha The Improver sig.png|talk]] The Improver 23:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe shorten the attribute names a bit? Domination Magic could just be Domination, for example. - anja  [[Image:User Anja Astor sig icon.png|talk]] 23:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, i'll try, but i won't promise any success :P &mdash;Zerpha[[Image:UserZerpha The Improver sig.png|talk]] The Improver 00:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

How about putting the professions along the left side, and the attributes for that profession going across? It'll stop it from going off the page, but still keep the full names of the attributes. -- Brains12 \ Talk 00:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Nice idea...the problem could be that primary and secondary attributes will maybe no longer be clearly viewable speperated in the table. &mdash;Zerpha[[Image:UserZerpha The Improver sig.png|talk]] The Improver 12:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * They could be if you have the first column for primary, and the next one for secondary. Or they could just be bolded? --[[Image:User Brains12 Spiral.png|15px| ]] Brains12 \ Talk 15:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)