Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Aiiane

Aiiane
This request is for the sysophood of User:Aiiane (talk &bull; contribs). Created by &mdash;Tanaric 21:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

Status
Accepted 00:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC).

Candidate statement
The common trend here seems to be expressing a lack of certainty as to what to write, so I suppose I'll go ahead and echo that for good measure - is anyone really sure how exactly to promote themselves? Personally, I prefer to be known by my actions - whether it be policy discussions, helping out with page cleanups, or even just answering wiki questions, both in and out of the wiki itself. As my user page states, one of my main objectives is to work towards a wiki that's easy to use and intuitive, while also streamlined and concise. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 04:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Support. Aiiane has been incredibly active and helpful since the inception of this wiki. &mdash;Tanaric 21:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. Aiiane has been very trustworthy and active, especially during policy discussions. I feel Aiiane would be a good addition to the admin crew. -  anja  [[Image:User Anja Astor sig icon.png|talk]] 21:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. Another fine choice for adminship.  Snog  rat [[Image:User Snograt signature.png]] 22:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Support. Aiiane is an excellent contributor who definitely deserves sysop status. LordBiro 22:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Support. Aiiane has been an exceptional contributor in all areas of the wiki. I am continually impressed by her manner in discussions and quality of contributions. -  B e X  [[Image:User BeXoR sig.gif|iawtc]] 09:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Support. Active and level-headed in discussions and a good contributor. -- ab.er. rant  [[Image:User Ab.er.rant Sig.png|sig]] 16:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Support ~ top class GWO moderating, you'll be an asset as an admin here too. Hats off to Aiiane! &mdash; Skuld 20:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Support. Aiiane is a great contributor, has a very level head in discussions and a mature attitude that is always a good thing for a position like this. -- Lemming64  16:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Support for the discussions started by Aiiane. - MSorglos (talk|contrib) 17:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Support. I've been very impressed with the standard and attitude of Aiiane's work on the wiki. --Indecision 03:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Support. Discusses things well. Usually has a good understanding of policy, and respects it. --Rezyk 07:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Weak support. [[Image:User Blastedt sig.jpg]] B LASTED T  15:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose. If you want a Nazi or Taliban admin, then pick Aiiane. See  David Holtzman 20:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. starts enough flames on GWO herself and should definitely be given further rights. I also wonder which "contributions" would qualify her for adminship. --Longasc 22:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Request for Reconfirmation

 * 1) As per talk page. 67.159.46.130 15:40, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I nominate both User:Aiiane and User:Tanaric for reconfirmations. Their recent blocks and ways that they have dealt with situations have shown that they are prejudice in the sense that they let their own personal issues with users get in the way of what they can and can not do according to policy. 75.155.71.72 10:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * i found them aware of what matters most too. lussh 03:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Agreed with 75.155. &mdash;  ク  Eloc  貢  03:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)