Guild Wars Wiki talk:Arbitration committee

Should this page not have a list of cases, especially current ones? Backsword 17:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppets
Just in case the arbcomm pages are not being watched... Guild Wars Wiki talk:Arbitration committee/2007-11-15-User:Raptors. -- ab.er. rant  14:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Arb Comm Pages?
Where does one go to request Arb Comm assistance? I do not have an immediate need, but I was curious and therefore searched without avail. Looking at Ab.er.rant's post, there is apparently a set of arbcomm pages for such requests. Could we have that linked from the main? Or at least could it be made more readily available, say with a redirect by typing "ArbComm" into the search bar? Just a couple of thoughts. Thanks. -- Gaile 06:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * And in a splendid example of "reading down a few lines on the main page" I located that which I sought. Please ignore my request above. ;) -- Gaile [[Image:User gaile_2.png| ]] 06:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Handling ArbComm cases during an election
I propose adding the following paragraph after the first paragraph of this article:

Bureaucrats are considered members of the ArbComm based upon the date the request for arbitration is made. If a bureaucrat loses his seat during an arbitration, he still acts as a member of ArbComm for that case until the arbitration is complete. Similarly, if a user attains a bureaucrat seat in the middle of an arbitration, he is ineligible to participate in that arbitration.

&mdash;Tanaric 07:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Sounds good :) - anja  [[Image:User Anja Astor sig icon.png|talk]] 10:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Something that probably should have been in there from the start, but was overlooked. I support this. [[Image:User Aiiane-a.gif|Go to Aiiane's Talk page]] (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 10:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. I also added a "for that case" in your suggested text above to clarify. --Xeeron 11:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Support. LordBiro 20:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * This would provide continuity, so I support. Presumably needs to go on the admin policy, rather than this desciptive page.


 * Also, if the date of acceptance or request preferable? Backsword 07:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Agree with change/idea, though also agree with Backsword's thought about whether we should be changing an official policy page instead. It should tend toward date of request (as originally proposed) rather than acceptance; otherwise you run into the issue of "who exactly is supposed to decide on accepting/declining?" across transitions. --Rezyk 23:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Agreed with Backsword about where this should be placed. Rezyk's support of my original proposal of date of request is the reason I proposed it that way to begin with. &mdash;Tanaric 04:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support it either way :) -- ab.er. rant [[Image:User Ab.er.rant Sig.png|sig]] 15:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Added to Adminship policy, removed from Policy proposal list. &mdash;Tanaric 04:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Hoorah. &mdash;  ク  Eloc  貢  21:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)