User talk:Previously Unsigned/To Do

Comments on table
That's nice! The only thing I am concerned about (had the same issue when making mine) is where to put the profession. I ended up leaving it out because I didn't want to do anymore but was planning to have the profession icon in a separate column to the left of skill name that only lists when profs start. maybe should have posted that originally. I don't want you to like have to do a lot of work to redo it but I think only an icon is needed as when you click the icon you get to the profession page, plus it looks neater IMO. Previously Unsigned 04:43, 31 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Actually, looking at the table, how it goes, I could do that myself! I just wouldn't know how to make the first column transparent. Do you mind if I reverse the skill name/profession places and then post it as that? Previously Unsigned 04:49, 31 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Copy, edit, paste. It's your research project :-)


 * BTW: it's not that much trouble to switch columns &mdash; just let me know what you want it to look like, once you decide on the design and if you find it takes more than 3-4 min; I have some tools that make it easier for me. — Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 04:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh... ha! I had already started... anyways was just gonna like swap column and 2 with each other, with prof as just an icon. I don't know if it would look ok or not with just ONE prof symbol for a whole group but it's like when you use "" to show that the same as above. If you post it with the prof icon for every line, then I can remove them easier than adding them to swap between. Previously Unsigned 05:08, 31 March 2011 (UTC)


 * So um, can you try it? I still don't know how to make only the first column invisible. If it can't be invisible, oh well. A lot of copy and paste otherwise too. Previously Unsigned 05:20, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Evidence suggesting the problem lies in the text, not the bug
Check out Power Block's talk page: apparently, the skill's original description made it easier to see that the disabling effect is divorced from successful interruption. Take a gander and decide for yourself. (That doesn't mean that there isn't an issue; especially if this is just a text issue, ANet could easily update the relevant interrupts to correctly describe whether the non-interrupt effects are dependent on interruption...or not). — Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 13:11, 4 May 2011 (UTC)