Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Lemming64/archive1

Lemming64
This request is for the sysophood of User:Lemming64 (talk &bull; contribs). Created by - B e X   01:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC).

Status
Accepted 01:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC).

Candidate statement
Thank you for the nomination. Just to sum up what I do here and why I do it; I am 100% focused on this Guild Wars Wiki and am all for making this the #1 place to come for information on GW. I really feel we have had an excellent first few months and I endeavour to keep it that way. My main area of contributions has come from watching for vandals, general house keeping activities (orphaned images is a little pet of mine), as well as creating and maintaining articles for areas I feel were a little neglected on Guildwiki eg. the miniatures section.

I live in the UK which would mean I am available in some of the more off-peak hours that most of the admin team is online and I have no other admin or maintenance based obligations that take away from my time here.

Thank you for reading this and happy editing :) -- Lemming64 16:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Support. Lemming64 is one of those respected, hard working contributors and is always polite and friendly and willing to help other users out. I think he would make a fantastic sysop. -  B e X  [[Image:User BeXoR sig.gif|iawtc]] 01:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. I feel that Lemming64 will make an excellent Admin --  Scourge  [[Image:User Scourge Spade.gif]] 01:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. He is very concerned and will make an excellent Admin. --- Hanks Gotcha 18:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Support. I feel he's handled himself very professionally on this wiki so far. HeWhoIsPale 18:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Support. Great sysop potential. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 20:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC) EDIT: I also strongly disagree with the opposing votes. I think that Lemmings acted properly on the linked discussion page. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 07:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Support. Lemming is super cool. LordBiro 20:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Support. Lemming will be a great Sysop ;) poke | talk 21:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Support. He provided some good technical info. And is interessed in Wiki development. -- M'vy | user |   talk | -- 09:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Support. Mostly because of how strongly I disagree with the oppose votes. I found Lemming64's actions, both in the linked instance and other places I've noticed him around, reasonable and in line with policy. - Tanetris 03:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Support. Great knowledge of policies and always there to explain and enforce them. I think Lemming would be a great sysop. -  anja  [[Image:User Anja Astor sig icon.png|talk]] 09:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Support. Admirable; perfect for the position. -- Snog  rat [[Image:User Snograt signature.png]] 20:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Support. Looked through his contribs trying to find incriminating material, failed. While I am always a bit weary to support people I dont know since forever, all his edits hint at him being good admin material. --Xeeron 10:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Well, might as well vote yes for you considering your the only one on this list who isn't a Sysop at Guildwiki.-- §  Eloc   §  03:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose. His actions and responses on Guild talk:Dragon Killaz make me question his ability to be an effective admin. - Auron  00:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose I agree with Auron. I don't think some of his actions, and responses i've seen are actions of an admin. --[[Image:Rein_Of_Terror-sig.png|20px]] Rein Of Terror  (talk · contributions) 15:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) along the lines of what auron says &mdash; Skuld 08:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Neutral. Do not feel he has shown leadership when he has stepped in to resolve issues. --Karlos 23:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Request for Reconfirmation

 * 1) This sysop tends to grasp at straws and attempt to create policy violations when none exist. I have seen him do this numerous times -- at first I chalked it up to his newness to the role, but now I think he's genuinely unsuited for the position. &mdash;Tanaric 16:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Agreed with Tanaric, for the same reasons. Following policy and punishing vios is fine, but making vios up and punishing based on that is not. - Auron 01:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Agree again, he seems to want to punish violations that don't happen, he is very hypocritical, and doesn't act in good faith for the good of the wiki.-- ChronicinabilitY  [[Image:User Chronicinability Spiteful_Spirit.jpg|18px]] 23:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ^ &mdash; Skuld 23:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)