User talk:Mediggo

In case you don't look
A small reminder 128.176.178.50 09:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I did, but I couldn't think of anything useful to say. :P Job well done then? Mediggo 09:18, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

hi
I don't want to make the update talk full of walls of text so I'll just give you a short opinion here :p.Its not because a skill is balanced that it is healthy for the game and it is not because a skill is spammable that it isnt balanced.VoR and PS indeed pose the problems you mentioned but they are OP.Now the difrence with Mendtouch natstride on rangers is that while touch and stride only push skills out of the meta (because they offer utility and require some skill) VoR and PS go much further then that.They provide skill-less boring and grindy gameplay.I have actually come to the conclusion that you do in fact GET WORSE by playing these builds.Just to let you know :) Lilondra   *panda*  11:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for posting here... umm... I'm not sure if I know what you're talking about, tbh. :P IMO VoR and PS are the most horrible skills (even more horrible than those which are horribly useless) in the game atm. While their previous versions needed something of a buff, their current versions are ridiculously overpowered compared to other elite skills, and they are also OP in general sense of PvP gameplay. And yes, I'm also sad because of skills like Mending Touch and Natural Stride because of the reason you just mentioned. I think we have exactly same opinion about this? Mediggo 12:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Kinda I was just saying that spammable =/= imbalance but = bad for the game in 99.9 % of the cases Lilondra  [[Image:User_Lilondra_Sig.png|21x21px]] *panda*  13:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * What makes skills like PS and Searing Flames bad is because they can be spammed. Mediggo 13:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Flare can be spammed but is not OP to be an example.What makes them OP is actually not that it just contributes to the fact that they are OP.PS has to much things in one and SF just has to much loldamage especially in teams. Lilondra [[Image:User_Lilondra_Sig.png|21x21px]] *panda*  15:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Using Flare as an example in this matter is quite fail? :/ Mediggo 15:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually Flare exactly proves my point.A skill with little to no recharge is not broken.However most of the time it will not promote good play and will thus be bad for the game.My point is spammability does not make something broken (most of the time) its the effect that does.85 % of the time (atleast) spammability just contributes to how broken a skill is Lilondra  [[Image:User_Lilondra_Sig.png|21x21px]] *panda*  19:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course both the effect and spammability matter, I'm not trying to say it's only one thing. Reworking either recharge or actual effect of those skills would help balancing them. But taking Flare as an example here is still bad. Mediggo 20:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually giving PS a 250 recharge would no longer make it viable but the effect itself would still be broken Lilondra  [[Image:User_Lilondra_Sig.png|21x21px]] *panda*  05:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I have yet to see a single balanced build using Flare. Even with buffed damage, it never will cause it's dumb. Dark Morphon 08:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You could try Orion's Norn fighting tourney skill bar. Free Flares ftw. Mediggo 12:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I was too depressed back then to comment anything on your, ummm... idea of nerfing PS. But yeah, little bit of exaggerating there. Mediggo 12:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Congrats
-- Halogod35   02:24, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * :D Thankies! Mediggo 23:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

This wiki
Has a system of one revert per user, not in total. It's good to know the policies you like to. Backsword 07:55, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently so, my apologies. I couldn't but think that the 1RV policy here is same (or at least mostly same) as in GuildWiki. I'd still like to discuss about that note on Energy Storage, though. Mediggo 08:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

That cape TexMod...
Ha, beat you to it :P Hopefully that IP will get the idea now I answered his comment. -- snog  rat  12:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * lol... yeah, hope so. >< Mediggo 13:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Ascalon
Oops, got a little overzealous with the removal of extraneous info. Thanks. Freedom Bound 12:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

are you
Rly this bored you watch my pages xD ? Nah go allong feel free to comment :p Lilondra   *panda*  17:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Thnx for welcoming me :D
Thnx for the welcome, can you help me i have a minor problem, how do i make a cool userpages just like urs?

thnx :D Nashaa 21:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

thnx for your help :D Nashaa 21:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Congratz
You made it to the finals of my Manliness build here I will now test builds to make some adjustments to ratings :)  Lilondra   *poke*  08:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * For testing I replaced Shadow refuge with Way of the fox.It was awesome enough toget the +8 % :) AND TATATADA :

also I'm sry but you don't get the cookie,wuhy ate it >< Lilondra   *poke*  10:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Reward number 2.

And lilondra, the contest thing is SO my idea. →← 20:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Please
explain yourself. --Falconeye 02:54, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Aren't you little late? Or is this some kind of cunning prank? Mediggo 17:20, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Lancy is currently not active on this wiki, so im taking the initiative. I could say the same in regards to your posted comment. Can you offer more details and constructive criticsim? --Falconeye 06:43, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No. Mediggo 14:51, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you at least explain what you meant by... "You just had to make spawning power completely imbaimbaimbalanced with weapon spells? gg..." as to better inform me on how to improve the page? --Falconeye 07:14, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not really interested. As I said, too old. I'd appreciate it if you didn't ask about this anymore. Mediggo 14:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)