Category talk:Unreplicable unique items

Should this category include non-max greens, many of which are only technically "unreplicable" because they have non-max mods? I personally do not think they count, as unreplicable otherwise means that an item has mods which could not normally coexist on that item (such as two inscriptions, or a focus mod on a staff...). I'll wait a bit before doing it, in case there is some reason that they should be included, but as it is, the category is inconsistent (by only containing some non-max greens and not others) and/or incomplete. Ailina 22:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Just because it would be undesirable isn't a reason for exclusion. But then again, someone who wanted to be really prepared for PvP wouldn't get them for that reason, as they might for the others. Manifold [[Image:User_Manifold_Jupiter.jpg|19px]] 23:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think they should stay. They're green items that can't be replicated. Correspondingly, the ones that are missing should be added. -- FreedomBound [[Image:User_Freedom_Bound_Sig.png|19px]] 23:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think they should be removed if they can be replicated from monster drops, particularly if all it takes is a couple mods and an inscription. Who cares if you can't craft a weaker version; that's silly. --76.22.247.48 02:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, I just noticed something. We already have a Category:Low requirement unique items.  That's where those items belong.  They shouldn't also be a part of this category.  They are essentially different than the "true" unreplicable weapons.  As Freedom said, the low-req weapons CAN be replicated using monster drops and non-maxed mods.  They don't belong in this category at all, especially since they already have their own category.  Unless there is stong (and reasoned) dissent, I'll remove the low-req unique items from this list tomorrow.  Ailina 04:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)