Template talk:Disguise nav

Delete
This has gotten far too large too be useful. Too large to be maintained too. As it is, it is no more helpful than the category. It has alos been included on some no diguise pages. for some articles, it could be replaced by induvidual navs for those articles, such as the celestrial disguises. Backsword 15:56, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Or just throw in come collapsible and that'll bring the appearance back down to a manageable level. --JonTheMon 15:57, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ...it is. And no, you can't read it when it's collapsed. Backsword 16:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, so it is. Stupid javascript. Anyhow, I was intending to propose a solution similar to Template:Miniatures nav, which uses collapse on sub-sections. --JonTheMon 16:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Hero Form
Do we REALLY want to list all 30+ forms in this Nav? Create a seperate nav for "special tonics"? Or list all disguise forms on the Hero Form page (similar to Henchmen Form) and save ourselves the headache? --Falconeye 02:54, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Either/or. We list all the minis in the miniature navbox. — Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 02:58, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * This has nothing to do with everlasting birthday tonic page, but with the tonics. I prefer not to "merge", because there's a difference, between adding to this box and a completely separate box there... The difference is in the coding to be a bit different... Due to the difference, I removed the merge. While I do agree with the list being "big", there's no problem in letting someone with knowledge to code in all the tonics that have their own page... Unlike the miniatures, there's no need for an image as they'll all likely use the same image (unless changed otherwise). Kaisha  User Kaisha Sig.png 06:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Image Forms
I noticed many are duplicates. Do we have to have that many duplicates? Can't we use one image for all forms that use the same image? Kaisha  16:53, 12 May 2011 (UTC)