Feedback talk:User/Wretched90/Defensive Stance

how does this interact with pets, minions and spirits Talamare 18:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * also... this is pre nerf Escape this is stronger then pre nerf Escape...... Talamare 18:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Changed it a bit so it would not be so beast and so I would not have to worry about pets or spirits. Wretched90 13:54, 23 September 2009 (CST)
 * so the caster doesnt get a block chance? Talamare 19:08, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No the main goal really is for the warrior to seem like a bodyguard. Also it would help prevent monk abuse. Wretched90 18:04, 23 September 2009 (CST)
 * I wouldn't put this on a warrior. It would suck on a warrior, you want your warriors up forward and bashing stuff in. I would take two copies of this, put em on alternate monks, and chain em. This change fails it's purpose - warriors will never use this shitty stance. WubVII  [[Image:User NuclearVII signature 3.jpg|19px]] [[Image:User_NuclearVII_sigheart.png|12px]] 23:11, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Well two warriors could chain it in the front line and two monks might have trouble kiting while trying to keep this on.71.88.206.109 02:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Trouble kiting? It speeds you up, why the hell would it make kiting difficult? NuVII  [[Image:User NuclearVII signature 3.jpg|19x19px]] 09:08, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes trouble kiting because you cannot exceed the nearby range requirement or else it will end. If both monks kite at the same time they will have trouble healing. Also having both of your monks stand right next to each other is the dumbest idea you could possibly think of.71.88.206.109 20:45, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1)Nearby isn't that close.
 * 2)Monks don't have to be next to other monks.
 * 3)They don't have to kite at the same time.
 * 4)I've had many a dumb thought, but only some of them would rival this suggestion in potency. NuVII  [[Image:User NuclearVII signature 3.jpg|19x19px]] 19:04, 23 October 2009 (UTC)