User talk:Alleji

FURTZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!-- *Yasmin Parvaneh*  03:53, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

your chart shows
that everyone on luxon afk's. also that this game is dead QQ -- adrin  00:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Wat? My chart shows that the fight is in Kurzick territory almost 80% of the time, so Luxons are better. How's that related to afkers? --Alleji

Welcome
Hello. You are really welcomed. If the datas you show in your futur analisys stay accurate, we will now have a tool to help us say "keep your bullsh... for yourself" to the people who might try to fool us. And I love that. Yseron - 90.15.177.39 05:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a bit complicated for me, but do these charts at all prove my personal theory that victories don't really help change the war line?-- [[Image:User_Vanguard_VanguardLogo.png|19px]] anguard  01:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Uh... they do. That's how the line changes. Map switches every 3 hours based on which side is winning more. Luxons win = line moves deeper into Kurz territory. Kurz win = line moves into Luxon. There's also something called "momentum", but anet hasn't released any numbers on that. Basically momentum makes the attacking side's victories count for more for the next time slot: say, if Luxons win more than 50% on Saltspray, map moves to Grenz, but the threshold there to move it to Ancestral is less than 50% due to momentum. However, if the line gets stalled on Grenz for another 3 hours (Luxons don't make the threshold), momentum is gone. WTB more explanation on game mechanics from anet tbh. --Alleji
 * Then I wonder why this one day my team and I won 10 in a row (no exaggeration, after four of them we started counting), and everyone else in the zone was bragging on how well we were doing and after a while we STILL got pushed back.-- [[Image:User_Vanguard_VanguardLogo.png|19px]] anguard  20:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)