The wiki upgrade is complete. If you notice anything that seems to be functioning incorrectly, please file a bug report.
[dismiss]

Difference between revisions of "Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for comment"

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Requests for comment: removed already split page, old question,)
m (Requests for comment)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
| style="padding: 8px 8px 0px 8px; background: #E9EDE5;" |
 
| style="padding: 8px 8px 0px 8px; background: #E9EDE5;" |
 
== Requests for comment ==
 
== Requests for comment ==
 +
* [[:Category:Tonics Usable in Explorable Areas]]
 +
:Would creating a single category to place all of the tonics that can be used in explorable areas be a valuable asset? {{gray|Added: 6 May 2012}}
 +
 
* [[Guild_Wars_Wiki_talk:Projects/Interactive_Maps#Integration_of_maps_on_explorable_area_articles|Interactive Maps#Integration of maps on explorable area articles]]
 
* [[Guild_Wars_Wiki_talk:Projects/Interactive_Maps#Integration_of_maps_on_explorable_area_articles|Interactive Maps#Integration of maps on explorable area articles]]
 
:Current setup uses ugly pictures of the interactive maps which are due to be removed, but how should we go about linking the interactive articles from the main pages? One such suggestion is [[User:Chieftain_Alex/sandbox_3#Usage|here]]. {{gray|Added: 26 April 2012}}
 
:Current setup uses ugly pictures of the interactive maps which are due to be removed, but how should we go about linking the interactive articles from the main pages? One such suggestion is [[User:Chieftain_Alex/sandbox_3#Usage|here]]. {{gray|Added: 26 April 2012}}

Revision as of 00:02, 6 May 2012

Community portalPolicyFormattingCategoriesProjectsRequests for commentRequests for research

Requests for comment

Requests for comment are for assisting editors in gathering further input on any wiki matter. This can be useful in generating discussion, resolving disputes, or reaching consensus. All editors are welcome to assist with a request by responding within the linked talk page. Remember that Guild Wars Wiki operates on a system of consensus rather than voting, and explaining your reasoning can generally be more helpful than simply supporting one side of a dispute.

To create a new request: add an item to the top of the list below, providing a brief, neutral summary of the issue and linking to an appropriate talk page section, without using alternative text for the link.

Requests for comment

Would creating a single category to place all of the tonics that can be used in explorable areas be a valuable asset? Added: 6 May 2012
Current setup uses ugly pictures of the interactive maps which are due to be removed, but how should we go about linking the interactive articles from the main pages? One such suggestion is here. Added: 26 April 2012
Should we update {{anomaly}} and {{bug}} to (a) auto-categorize anomalies and bugs so that (b) it's easier for ANet to see easy-fixes (without people having to post both here and on the official Support Forums)? Added: 6 March 2012
The skill progression template suffers from a workaround for a browser bug from 2007. Getting rid of the workaround would allow us to improve the template. Added: 20 February 2012
Should profession names be capitalized? Added: 11 February 2012
We can automatically calculate totals for drop data. Is it worth accepting some small caveats for automatisation? Shall we use it on other drop data articles? Added: 8 February 2012
We now have the means to use reintroduce autocategorization of items by salvage (i.e. into Category:Contains iron). Should we go ahead with it?
Could the template be altered to have more images?
Got an article that you love? has it been featured? if yes to the first and no to the second please come nominate it!
Should the allegiance skill icons be displayed side by side, similar to how {{duplicate skill icon}} handles images?
Looking at redesigning the main page and a way to deal with in game events.
Personal tools