Requests for comment
Requests for comment are for assisting editors in gathering further input on any wiki matter. This can be useful in generating discussion, resolving disputes, or reaching consensus. All editors are welcome to assist with a request by responding within the linked talk page. Remember that Guild Wars Wiki operates on a system of consensus rather than voting, and explaining your reasoning can generally be more helpful than simply supporting one side of a dispute.
To create a new request: add an item to the top of the list below, providing a brief, neutral summary of the issue and linking to an appropriate talk page section, without using alternative text for the link.
|
- Proposal for bureaucrat role: removing arbcomm and elections, introducing indefinite terms.
- Henchmen pages list one singular build in some cases but their earlier appearences in Ascalonian towns/outpost only use half the skills displayed which is missleading. I found out this since I decided to vanquish with henchmen only for the Prophecies title but these NPCs were not performing as any wiki-reader would expect. Also in HM, their performance will differ from the written one in each of their main pages. Added: 3 June 2012
- Should skill pages with Notes about AI usage with undocumented contributions (in each talk page) be removed unless replicable (has enough information to indicate readers how to duplicate so that anyone can confirm them)? See also, GWW:AI PROJECT and give your opinion about this template: Template:AI_behavior_update to start application. Added: 27 May 2012
- Would creating a single category to place all of the tonics that can be used in explorable areas be a valuable asset? Added: 6 May 2012
- Should we update {{anomaly}} and {{bug}} to (a) auto-categorize anomalies and bugs so that (b) it's easier for ANet to see easy-fixes (without people having to post both here and on the official Support Forums)? Added: 6 March 2012
- The skill progression template suffers from a workaround for a browser bug from 2007. Getting rid of the workaround would allow us to improve the template. Added: 20 February 2012
- Should profession names be capitalized? Added: 11 February 2012
- We can automatically calculate totals for drop data. Is it worth accepting some small caveats for automatisation? Shall we use it on other drop data articles? Added: 8 February 2012
- We now have the means to use reintroduce autocategorization of items by salvage (i.e. into Category:Contains iron). Should we go ahead with it?
- Could the template be altered to have more images?
- Got an article that you love? has it been featured? if yes to the first and no to the second please come nominate it!
- Should the allegiance skill icons be displayed side by side, similar to how {{duplicate skill icon}} handles images?
- Looking at redesigning the main page and a way to deal with in game events.
|
