Talk:Rune of Vigor

From Guild Wars Wiki

Can the Superior version of these drop anywhere that gold armors drop?Morbid Mordecai 10:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I have only noticed them drop from high end areas or Hard Mode (For example after the desert in proph). Shireen 22:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I've found one from Margonite Tunic during mission Jennurs horde on normal mode. Gunm 11:43, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I have had a Superior rune drop in a gold armour drop from one of the chests in Sorrow's Furnace. Elvynd Asailight 19:33, 26 Janruary 2009 (UTC)

I've found one from a Naga Vambrace drop in nomal mode near (but not from)Ssaresh Rattler in the Maishang Hills.

Salvaged one today off a Kournan Bracer dropped by a Kournan Guard in Consulate Docks mission (normal mode). This is the earliest point in any campaign that I've received one (I've had one other, from somewhere in the Realm of Torment if I remember correctly).

The Minor Rune of Vitae does only +10 Health and DOES STACK. I am not certain if the others stack or not. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:166.82.48.89 (talk).

Yes, you are right the Rune of Vitae (there are no minor/major/superior vitaes) provides +10 hp and does stack, but not a minor Rune of Vigor.-- Wyn 05:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

So, if I have a rune of vitae and a Superior rune of vigor on a set of armor, do i get both bonuses? -- UglyLooking 01:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes because it's a stacking bonus. A non-stacking bonus will not stack with another non-stacking bonus but a stacking bonus used with a non-stacking bonus will stack. (Like using a headgear piece with a superior rune to receive +4 to attribute) 89.242.181.143 07:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Wait, I don't get it. You can only have ONE rune attach to an armor right? You can't have both rune of vitae AND rune of vigor on ONE set... can you? Stop The Killin, 5 Febuary 2009 (UTC)

No, you can have five runes per set, one per piece, so you could have one vigor and up to four vitae. Backsword 12:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] 41??

Why is it forty-ONE? Anyone thinking this could be a typo in the code? It would be more logical to have 30,40,50, or not? 79.75.120.191 14:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I would have to say "Or not," my assumption being that it is representing diminishing returns for the additional HP. 67.186.22.130 18:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, 41 is pretty odd. Who knows why ANet chose this...

It's just fun to have 521 health instead of boring old 520. — Pony 22:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC)