Guild Wars Wiki:Admin noticeboard/Archive 11

Riven (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Just thought I should bring it to the Sysops and let them decide on what to do, but Riven has been violating GWW:SIGN for 6 months while GWW:SIGN gives something of a max of 10 days or so. Just saying, but if you don't enforce policys, then people will eventually figure out that they are not enforced and they can just not follow it. Just thought I'd bring that to a Sysops attention. — ク Eloc 貢 10:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

How is riven violating the policy? The signature icon's within the 19x19 size limit. -- Gordon Ecker 10:57, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

"You must at least include a link to your user page or your talk page". His is just an image. I got a couple more if ya need them. — ク Eloc 貢 11:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, his sig image does link to his user page via redirect. It's another technically he's breaking policy but it's somewhat nitpicky, imo --Snograt 11:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

go to his talk page, just another loser who fails at going against policys, block him already --Cursed Angel 11:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) "An easily recognized version of your username is allowed.", I don't consider Я, which is a letter in a different alphabet an "easily recognize version". — ク Eloc 貢 11:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I do. What's your point? -Auron 11:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

That policys are horribly enforced here sometimes. — ク Eloc 貢 11:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

(Edit conflict)x2 So you couldn't possibly tell that Я is in fact an R? Nevertheless, I too am for him changing that sig. If <big> isn't allowed since it changes the flow of the text, then it shouldn't be allowed to reposition your sig either, as he does. Note the "position: relative; bottom: 5px;" moving his sig up 5 pixels. — Galil 11:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

To be honest, this looks like troublemaking to me. If you look at Riven's talk page there was a lot of discussion about his sig, which he changed several times. He did start making random threats, but then he backed down and changed it. Noone seems to have objected to his present version and there are no entries on his talk page since August (except cursed angel's one just now - I suspect CA didn't notice the date stamps). So bringing this up here is just troublemaking, regardless of whether Riven's sig is currently technically OK.Cassie 11:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Sigh - you're all right, of course. I just recognise that this particular user has a bee in his bonnet about GWW:SIGN, and I was hoping to avoid escalating old arguments. Not a valid concern, I suppose, but it will happen :( --Snograt 11:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Agreed with Cassie. — ク Eloc 貢 11:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I've seen this on a few occasions since the last mess over his sig, but intentionally left it since it has not been disruptive. Galil, can you point to where that reposition is, so we can see if it's the most recent version? I've not noticed that myself, but I agree it is disrupting and should be changed, if it is what is used now. - anja 13:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Turned out it was an old version of his sig. — Galil 13:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

To be fair this user is hardly active around the wiki. With 4 contributions in the last 3 months it is hardly a need for such persecution on this issue. If he refuses to add his name to the signature again the new notes on his talk page something will need to be done though. --Lemming 16:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

He started again ~ SCobra 11:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

He's starting to be more active Lemming — ク Eloc 貢 06:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

207.188.196.98 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Vandal. I'd warn him but I can't really tell him that I'll "ban" him. :P — Galil 22:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I just say they will get blocked, not that I will do it. :) Warned. - anja 22:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Bah. Block that bastard. -_- — Galil 22:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Up to 5-6 reverts now, 3 of which are after he got the warning. — Galil 22:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Banz0rs. MisterPepe talk 22:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

218.202.7.231 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibberbot. Lord of all tyria 15:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked - anja 15:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

124.217.251.166 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Creating spam page. Lord of all tyria 15:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked - anja 15:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

193.95.68.196 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibberbot. Lord of all tyria 15:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked -- Brains12 • Talk • 15:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Francois (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Vandal: Blanking and racial slurs. - HeWhoIsPale 15:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked a few seconds ago :P -- Brains12 • Talk • 15:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Well that just proves that I need to refresh recent changes more compulsively. - HeWhoIsPale 16:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

61.130.11.115 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibber.--Gummy Joe 19:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Got it. - anja 19:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

217.20.138.129 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gigantically evil little bot. --  (CoRrRan / talk) 12:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Corr ik had gehoord, dat jij de botbuster van de wiki bent ~ SCobra 12:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked, a bit late, but still. - anja 15:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Readem (talk • contribs • logs • block log) and Nicky Silverstar (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

They've been involved in a flame war for a while. After being warned in this edit, Readem has made personal attacks against Niky in these three edits: [1] [2] [3], and Nicky has made a personal attack against Readem in this edit. Should this go to arbitration? -- Gordon Ecker 03:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Good grief, don't drag this into arbcom for the next month while they keep flaming each other. Just ban them both for a few days and be done with it. Lord Belar 03:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

They seem to have stopped for the moment. I'd consider that enough, I don't think a block as a "punishment" this late would do any good. If you feel ArbComm is warranted Gordon, then do as you wish. I personally don't feel it's needed yet. We should keep an eye on this issue, any signs of more flaming and they should both get blocked. - anja 09:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree that a block probably wouldn't be much use now. I would say, though, that violation of NPA is, in my opinion, reason enough to block without going to arbcomm, should they begin personally attacking each other again. Of course, if you think their behaviour in general deserves arbitration then by all means make a request. LordBiro 12:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

I am confused. By saying that she is bad at the game (which is true), and that role-playing is dumb (which is also true), I have violated NPA? So in this upside-down world of Wiki, using similar logic, ur smart and im dumb? Oic. gg --Readem 06:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I would like to add that I edited my flame against Readem after I first wrote it into something non-flaming, before anyone told me I was flaming. In the future, I'll try to refrain from even posting it in the first place, but it is hard when everyone who posts seems to agree with the person flaming you, and no visible action being taken against the flaming in the first place. Nicky Silverstar 10:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

218.106.244.90 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibberbot. Biscuits 13:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Undo. Undo. Undo. Hurty finger. :( Biscuits 14:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

OK I'm done now. Somebody else can deal with the rest. :p Biscuits 14:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked --Xasxas256 14:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

12.206.217.50 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Vandalism here.--Pyron Sy 00:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Warned. - anja 00:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

82.139.157.131 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibber. Calor (t) 00:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. - anja 01:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

218.202.7.231 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Spot another. Calor (t) 01:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked again :/ --Xasxas256 01:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

217.172.56.132 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibber. --Aspectacle 09:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked - anja 10:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

212.107.116.240 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

~ SCobra 14:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC) This IP is on SPAM FIRE!!!! Devi Talk 14:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked - anja 14:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Calor/Eloc

Could a Sysop please recreate that page and move it to somewhere in my namespace? — ク Eloc 貢 09:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Eloc Jcg/Calor. -- ab.er.rant 10:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

222.170.243.158 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibber. Biscuits 12:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

blocked. poke | talk 13:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

202.86.197.4 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

GibberrerSnograt 03:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Bex got it. Calor (t) 19:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

202.189.74.2 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Repeated vandalism of various pages. Nbajammer 06:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Tanetris blocked it. Calor (t) 19:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

217.102.250.153 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Repeated vandalism of various pages. Arduinna 11:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Dealt with by Tanetris. Calor (t) 19:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Henk (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Mulitple page blankings. - HeWhoIsPale 11:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

probable association with User:217.102.250.153. - HeWhoIsPale 11:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked by Tanetris. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 19:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

85.228.78.165 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibber. Calor (t) 01:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked - Tanetris 01:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

202.85.54.90 (talk • contribs • logs • block log) and 38.103.18.240 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

More gibber -- Hong 07:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- ab.er.rant 07:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

219.101.39.218 (talk • contribs • logs • block log) and 63.175.30.87 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

These too -- Hong 07:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- ab.er.rant 07:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

220.202.12.53 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibber. Lord of all tyria 10:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked by Bex -- Brains12 • Talk • 14:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

125.47.41.166‎ (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Bit of gibbering going on --BramStoker (talk, contribs) 11:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked by Bex -- Brains12 • Talk • 14:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Norrukki (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Is he allowed to have a Anet tag on his page, hes obviously no Anet employee ~ SCobra 20:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I took it off the page, I wouldn't think he should have that on it. --(Brains12) (talk) 21:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

87.101.240.8 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Yet more gibber -- Hong 07:22, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Gordon Ecker 07:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

212.142.143.116 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibber Calor (t) 16:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked --Brains12 talk 16:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Pikaro (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Vandal -- Hong 01:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Already blocked. -- ab.er.rant 01:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

210.7.95.12 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Giberbot. --People of Antioch talk 01:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- ab.er.rant 01:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

145.103.252.45 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Vandal spamming massive changes to random articles. But at least it's not a gibberbot! -- Hong 14:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Bang! And the vandal's gone! - BeX 15:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

217.21.240.107 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibberbot.   Elenya (T)  10:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. - anja 12:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

195.159.132.253 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibberish bot.--Fighterdoken 20:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

blocked --Lemming 20:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

84.161.192.201 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Continuos vandalization of title articles, specially Party Animal.--Fighterdoken 20:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Party Animal protection request

Otherwise, this will be a looong afternoon :).--Fighterdoken 20:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

The two vandals are already blocked. Will keep an eye on that article. poke | talk 20:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

The hour after an update is always a pain. Especially when it contains skill changes. -_- — Galil 20:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

204.73.200.75 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

River trying to by-pass ban ~ SCobra 22:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

And an unwarranted one at that. -- Armond Warblade 22:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked by Tanetris. -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

208.53.157.22 (talk • contribs • logs • block log) This one too pls ~ SCobra 22:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

91.194.90.76 (talk • contribs • logs • block log) ~ SCobra 22:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:51, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

209.17.190.78 (talk • contribs • logs • block log) ~ SCobra 23:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Brains12 \ Talk 23:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Looking at User talk:Brains12#Today's update, I'd like to suggest to the sysops to extend the ban length for User:Riven to more than just 2 days. He shouldn't be "getting away" with that kind of behaviour just because he's currently blocked. Regardless of whether you consider the purpose of blocks to be prevention or punishment, his violating NPA repeatedly and threatening to keep disrupting the wiki with proxies bypassing the ban should (in my opinion) be good enough reason to keep him blocked for a while longer. --Dirigible 00:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Tack on an extra week for every additional IP? -- Hong 00:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

As much as I'd like to see that happen, I believe two weeks total is suitable for a two day ban for NPA and rude remarks, then using various proxy IP's to make more unneeded insulting comments. Calor (t) 00:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Dirigble, but I think it would be best if another sysop chose and implemented a lengthier ban.-- Brains12 \ Talk 16:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Block. I wanted to just block for a week but then I saw how many attempts he made to circumvent the block. Two weeks is justified. -- ab.er.rant 08:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Readem (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

I've considered bringing Readem up to ArbComm, but I would like some more opinions on this. - anja 01:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

From what I've seen with my non-sysop eyes, it would be a good idea indeed. — Galil 01:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

After the election, perhaps? Calor 01:43, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

As added last election, Biro is still in ArbComm for any case opened during the election. So I don't think that matters much. - anja 01:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I wasn't sure where the rotation was at. Then whatever works, and I do support this going to ArbComm. Calor 01:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Dooooo it. -- Armond Warblade 01:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

readem owns too much bitches --78.82.75.156 16:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

59.14.174.100 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Returning gibberbot -- Hong 12:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

NM, Anja was too fast for me. Curse you, Anja! -- Hong 12:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

;) - anja 12:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

217.24.183.211 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Another gibberbot. Ban plx? Bigrat2 Talk 11:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Anja got it. Calor 19:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

200.29.96.75 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

And another <_< Bigrat2 Talk 11:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Got them both :) - anja 11:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

66.216.91.200 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Another gibberbot   Elenya (T)  11:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Check ;) - anja 11:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

63.85.75.253 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Yet another gibberer (returning)   Elenya (T)  16:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. - anja 17:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

195.226.227.125 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

-FireFox 08:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

61.130.108.194 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibber Bigrat2 Talk 09:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

blocked --Rainith 09:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Rainith's back? Wow. Calor 19:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

He pops in from time to time. — ク Eloc 貢 22:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

{{Rt}}, {{Me}}, & {{A}}

Could we get these unprotected considering the other profession templates aren't protected? — ク Eloc 貢 22:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Or maybe protect the rest of them, as they're all much used and not likely to be changed? --Snograt 23:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

81.156.190.167 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Personal attack and vandalism against Drago. — ク Eloc 貢 23:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Looks like he stopped 4 hours ago, so I don't think he needs a block atm. -- Brains12 \ Talk 23:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

200.123.157.130 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibber bot. --People of Antioch talk 01:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

blocked --Lemming 01:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

189.70.6.159 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Serious returning vandal. --People of Antioch talk 15:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't think it's a returning vandal as it only has one contribution. More likely, there are a number of people wanting to vandalise that guild page, as seen by the conversation on Anja's page so, for now, just keep an eye out. -- Brains12 \ Talk 16:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Loll (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Spamming lots of dubious and irrelevant/marginally relevant changes to Gaile's article. -- Hong 03:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Looks like it was mostly sorted on the article talk page. I left a link to the content policy on the user's talk page. - BeX 04:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to request a deletion of a few revisions, though. Specifically the ones including personal info. — Galil 04:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you link me the diffs? I only see one with an email address. - BeX 04:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

1 for the guild wars account name. 2 and 3 for wikipedia user info (if it's her), a user who supposedly posted in political articles, and AFAIK political opinions are allowed to keep anonymous. — Galil 04:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Now that I look at that wikipedia user's contributions it doesn't seem like there were any posts to talk pages, so opinions can be excluded. Still, anonymous edits are anonymous for a reason. — Galil 04:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

They are still as anonymous as they were before they were posted here. There are other ways to find out when someones posts from a corporate IP address, and there is no evidence that any of those posts were made by Gaile. - BeX 04:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Indeed there isn't, in fact I personally doubt they are. But since they could be and it's not necessarily a corporate IP, and the fact the revision states it is very likely to be her, that kind of ruins the anonymity of it IMO. Just in case it was her, you know? — Galil 05:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I disagree but if any of the other sysops think it's a concern they can delete those revisions as well. My main reasoning behind this (other than what I have said above) is that: Gaile has posted from IP addresses before (on her talk page and probably user page), I don't believe the information is sensitive and if it's not a corporate IP, then there is even less of a link between the two. - BeX 05:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I won't push it, I see your point. My last comment was more of a reflection of why I considered it personal info at all. I respect any sysop's decision. ;) — Galil 05:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

220.245.179.133 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Repetitive NPA breaches directed at Izzy, or so it would seem to me anyway. — Galil 05:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. - BeX 05:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

195.229.242.154 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

— ク Eloc 貢 06:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- ab.er.rant 06:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Update to protected page

Hi. Guild Wars Wiki:General disclaimer is slightly out of date. It needs to include Eye of the North in the trademarks section at the bottom of the page. Could someone update it, please? Thanks. --Aspectacle 21:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

That's more of an ArenaNet thing; I'll leave a link on Emily's talk page. -- Brains12 \ Talk 21:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

203.92.92.42 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibberbot. *Defiant Elements* +talk 22:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Isaiah Cartwright

I think some Sysop intervention is needed on this page. Looking at it, people still are making new subpages for each and every update that is done, but isn't that not allowed considering it's his userpage? Izzy hasn't even made a contribution since November. An example would be like Brains (lets pick Brains because his name is above this topic) going to Defiant Elements (he's above brains) page and adding subpages to his userspace. Do the Sysops here really think that this should be allowed? — ク Eloc 貢 02:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Izzy has set up his talk page in a way to encourage user feedback, so there's nothing wrong with users creating new subpages unless Izzy says otherwise. In any case, Xeeron has already asked Gaile to clarify with Izzy on what he plans to do with his talk page. We can act when we have a better idea of what he plans to do now that he's become inactive. -- ab.er.rant 03:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't know about the other sysops, but I'll be watching that page, and subsequent pages, more closely. I'm willing to enforce trolling etc with blocks. -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Meh just realised that's got nothing to do with the subject of this topic, but I thought you would like to know :P -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

That would be a very helpful move. Seeing how Izzy is just back a few hours only to be abused on his talk page again is a bad sign. --Xeeron 00:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

69.9.146.42 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Vandalism of some dagger pages, and others. Warned, but continuing. Calor 02:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Has stopped since you warned him. I'll keep an eye on it. - BeX 02:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

lol blocked.. - BeX 02:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Noticed. He's talking to me in-game, driving me in circles. Something about "Editing Bronze Daggers (section)", and asking what he'll do because he's blocked. Bizarre. Calor 02:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

59.100.12.75‎ (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Vandalism of the current bureaucrat voting pages. --BramStoker (talk, contribs) 08:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Posted a note. - anja 10:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

219.147.217.91‎ (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibber Biscuits 12:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Brains12 \ Talk 14:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

67.159.44.138 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Non-constructive personal attack against Izzy - this edit on Izzy's talk page. --Aspectacle 22:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Warned -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

71.244.226.104 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Could be trouble. Biscuits 20:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Seems to have stopped, will keep an eye on it. - anja 21:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

86.164.11.135 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Nonconstructive edits to the Phoenix (pet) article. Consider watching for other activity that may be disruptive. --People of Antioch talk 22:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

warned. --Lemming 23:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Ck5R9y (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Link spamming --Valshia 18:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

My first infiniban :P -- Brains12 \ Talk 18:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

80.227.1.101 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

gosh.. wth gibber -elviondale (tahlk) 05:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Also coming in from 80.227.1.100

Both already blocked a while ago. -- ab.er.rant 09:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

69.94.124.234 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Gibberbot. Nbajammer 23:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

blocked --Lemming 23:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

200.68.73.193 (talk • contribs • logs • block log)

Returning gibberbot. Chaiyo Kaldor 23:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked -- Brains12 \ Talk 23:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)