Talk:Armor of Salvation

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

My 55 can drop SoA now, and ram in another smite :) 89.241.234.194 14:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

does it reduce damage after or before prot spirit?
Does this armor bonus stack with skills and spells armor bonus making a cap of 24+10 for 34?--Justice 18:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


Question about the Acquisition Section[edit]

"Can be obtained in Dwarf Dungeon's Chest by chance." Which chest is that exactly? --68.32.187.152 22:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Did update actually change this?[edit]

I was in a group that used this today and it still said "immunity" rather than "50% immunity" while it was affecting me. Anybody know if the change was never implemented or what? Mohnzh say what? 04:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Animation and sound[edit]

When used, this item plays the same sound and animation as the Holy Veil skill. Would that be trivia/note-worthy?--Sensei 16:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I would call it noteworthy, yeah. --70.158.147.18 02:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Wording Clarification[edit]

The item tooltip says "immunity to 50% of critical hits". I am left wondering if it grants immunity when a critical hit is scored (50% of the time), or if it reduces the damage (or just the critical portion of such damage) of critical hits by 50%. "Immunity" would indicate the former, however the latter seems to be the more likely effect. Eitther way, the tooltip is poorly worded, and it could be clarified on this page until such time as the tooltip is changed. Gwynna Vive 18:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

My guess is that "Whenever a character under Armor of Salvation(buff) would get struck by a critical hit, generate a random number. If the generated number is even, the character is hit as normal. Otherwise the hit is treated as a normal hit, not having its damage multiplied by 1.44 or triggering effects like Critical Strikes and so and so on". Can't really see this as being anything other than this, but looking at all possibilities of meaning from the wording, I believe that yes, it could be considered a slightly ambiguous description - VileLasagna 17:28, 20 November 2010 (UTC)