Talk:Flesh Golem
From Guild Wars Wiki
Contents |
[edit] Species?
I was unsure, so I set it as undead - but would species be minion in this case? AT(talk | contribs) 01:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- Fleshy undead. Minion is more a subtype of undead I would say, or just a classification. If you interested in helping to organise species, you might be interested in the proposals currently underway in Talk:Species. -- ab.er.rant
01:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- Aren;t theire monsters which don't have masters which are flesh Golems? SystemisFlawed
[edit] Level 31
Why isn't there any data for a level 31 Flesh Golem?--DNA 19:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- Good question... 31 and 33 are mysteriously missing! Although that might have something to do with the difficulty of reaching a death magic level high enough to get flesh golems with levels like that to do extensive research into their statistics. Silavor
22:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hm, yes, I found the answer to the question. As a side note, I'm an idiot for not checking things out thoroughly before answering. Flesh golem levels are determined by your death magic level, but they go up by 2 levels for every death magic level you have. So it's impossible to get level 31 or 33 golems, as well as a whole bunch of other levels of flesh golem, because they simply don't exist. Silavor 22:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Level 31 Flesh Golems do exist, I have a screenshot of one. Don't know how to get it on here though. Patterson 00:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hm, yes, I found the answer to the question. As a side note, I'm an idiot for not checking things out thoroughly before answering. Flesh golem levels are determined by your death magic level, but they go up by 2 levels for every death magic level you have. So it's impossible to get level 31 or 33 golems, as well as a whole bunch of other levels of flesh golem, because they simply don't exist. Silavor
[edit] The Table
That table is huge and it's messing the wiki's layout. Since the most popular lvl of the golem is till lvl 28, can't we have the table till that level and put the rest of the levels in the notes section? --Mage
Montu 23:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] damage type
Theoretically we could find out what damage type it uses, setup a 1v1 vs a sin using 3 armor sets, each having a +10vs slashing/blunt/pierce type then have him run in a circle letting the golem crit him, find out what armor set reduces it the most and presto, you have your damage type. I hope. I'd do it but its almost 12:30 here and I'm off to bed, plus I don't have a necro on my acct with flesh golem. Weaponmaster 07:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's a pretty good thought. I'll see if I can get around to testing that this week. ··· cedave 15:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Move
are there any objections? the tags been up for a couple months now, so if no one thinks the move shouldn't happen, might as well get on with it. ··· cedave 15:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'd agree with the move, as the other minions (Shambling Horror, Bone Horror, etc.) follow a similar format. I'll try to move it soon (but that table beign so far down is really annoying me!) ~Celestia 07:30, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Tonic
Why isn't there a Flesh Golem tonic? I would kill for it. --Aldarik 20:56, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
