Talk:Luxon

From Guild Wars Wiki

suggest move to "Faction (Luxon)" Vlad 16:20, 14 February 2007 (PST)

Contents 1 Previously it said Alliance/Hero Battles 2 Nobody realizes but me... 3 The Name Luxon 4 Jadeite Shard 5 Notes Section 6 Derogatory Name - Invisible Consensus?

[edit] Previously it said Alliance/Hero Battles

There are no Luxon npcs in hero battles? Dancing Gnome 08:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nobody realizes but me...

...That an absolutely huge amount of Luxon names are directly from Greek Mythology?

Nope, we've all noticed. Roman, too. Theodosius was a Roman emperor who made Christianity the official religion, iirc. Calor (t) 02:47, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Name Luxon

Reading the name forward, returns the part Lux, latin "light" Reading it backwards it returns the part Nox, latin "dark" ... this might be interesting to mention.

[edit] Jadeite Shard

I had 1 of these drop from 1 of the luxons foes in Eternal Grove HM, not sure wich one thou, 1st time ive seen them drop 1 of them

They do indeed drop these, all luxons do, from what I know. As do several of the Jade Brotherhood (which would make sense). -- Wandering Traveler 23:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Thought i'd mention as it isn't noted in the luxons npc's articles

oh? hmm...let me go add that. -- Wandering Traveler 23:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

should that be mentioned? --Blood Anthem 00:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

LUXONS ROCK! That is all.

Luxons rule, Kurziks don't! Haha! Luxon win, Kurziks lose, we rule, you don't, now die stinky Kurzik! That is all I wanted to say.

How VERRRRYY mature of you. How about I start blathering slander and offensive humor about Luxon?

Also, "Kurzik" is correctly spelled "Kurzick".

Acting all like you're so awesome... and yet you don't know how to spell properly. For shame.

[edit] Notes Section

Is the slang explanation really needed? --68.32.187.152 19:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

It's a common term used in-game to refer to them, so i think it's worth mentioning. Please note that we have both, Suxon and Kurdick, so this is not intended to be biased towards only one of them (hence the "copy-paste explanatory info").--Fighterdoken 19:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Lmfao, I didn't know those redirects were there. — ク Eloc 貢 03:59, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Derogatory Name - Invisible Consensus?

Where is said consensus? And why is this on the Luxon page and not on it's own page in the glossary section with the other garbage "slag" articles? 122.104.167.139 00:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, the discussion about it took place on the original reverter's talk page, so it's understandable that it could be seen as invisible; the discussion is at User talk:Salome#Kurzick article. The Suxon page redirects to here, but I'm not quite sure why it isn't its own article -- perhaps it's too short for an alternative name and a redirect suits better. -- Brains12 \ talk 00:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

If I knew how to remove the redirect and create its own page I would do it but I don't. Other player used terms have shorter entries and have their own pages. This doesn't belong here and should be given it's own page. That way we can add the tags that all the other player terms have and people can see it in the glossary. This also allows anyone who wants to know what it means a means of finding it. This page is about the Luxon race in the context of Guild Wars lore and it doesn't belong on this page. Could you please move it? 122.104.167.139 00:28, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Those are good reasons, but a quick glance at Talk:Suxon#why redirect? seems to explain a little why it's a redirect; however, it might be better the way you explained (and I prefer that as well), so perhaps it can either be discussed or the change made. (For future reference, if you need to edit a redirect page -- click the link, and you'll see a "Redirected from Suxon" just underneath the title. Click that link and you'll end up on the redirect page which you can now edit.) -- Brains12 \ talk 00:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Also, if the notes are being moved to their respective pages, I suggest a "See also" header with the relevant term linked. However, I don't want to get into a revert war over whether or not the term should stay as it is, so... wait for comments I guess. An RFC, perhaps.-- Brains12 \ talk 00:45, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Since i am the one to be blamed for the merge... When i merged them, it was under the assumption Suxon is used to refer Luxons without aditional meaning (besides being derogatory), same as Kurdick for Kurzicks. This is not, by example, the case of wammo, that not only refers to warrior/monks, but also includes a lot of background information on the term itself.

In any case, since i know that this is a controversial issue for people involved with one faction or another, i guess that moving the information back to their very-short articles could be helpful, if for nothing else, to stop the revert wars here.--Fighterdoken 01:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

4 People are not a consensus. And I believe that this should stay in-game, and off the wiki. We don't need to document every word in the game -- no matter how much its used. Terms or not, there not wiki worthy. Dominator Matrix 01:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

I disagree. --76.25.197.215 01:05, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Obviously I disagree, for the reasons on Salome's talk page. (Also, consensus isn't based upon number, it's based upon the agreement of the parties involved, i.e. those who took part in the discussion. Whether it's an agreement between 4 people or 40 people, consensus is consensus until it's challenged or revived and subsequently changed.) -- Brains12 \ talk 01:06, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Wow... is really the word to describe this, first off, the term was probably coined by some 12 y/o ass who decided it would be funny to turn the different factions into some sort of "gang war" but a majority of the player base could care the fuck less, most only do AB for title grinding to fuel the skills that come out of it. To be perfectly honest these pages should not exist, it doesnt take a genius to figure out what the term stands for, and if you actually give half a damn what faction your guild supports you're a terrible player. Its not a "Controversial Issue" Its a stupid slang term. AB is the lowest form of PvP and about on the same level as PvE. No one needs to search for the term "suxon" or "kurdick" to know what they mean and no one will, they are pointless pages that need to be deleted--99.153.226.11 22:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Let me just give you one example of who could use such pages: A user new to the game who only owns Prophecies, reaches Lion's Arch, and sees the names flying around without knowing what they are about. Sure, he could imagine that they are derogatives, but would be unable to know what the original name is, actually. (Not that it happened to me, nope, not at all).--Fighterdoken 22:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) There's a difference between the in-game significance of something and the documentation of something. The wiki frankly doesn't care whether people are terrible players (in terms of skill, not knowledge); we document nonetheless. -- Brains12 \ talk 22:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Essentially what your trying to say is that the wiki will maintain articles on what is pretty much in game stupidity. Fighter if someone owns only prophesies then what does it matter to them what a suxon or a kurdick is? What ever, if keeping something that shows how honestly retarded some of the guildwars community can be benefits the wiki, i'll stop.--99.153.226.11 03:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)