Talk:Lyssa's ice cave

From Guild Wars Wiki

Supercobra, could you please explain the two reverts to the same edit by two different users on this page? I believe that if one of the temples is there, that both should be. While it may be in the Places of Interest template, to delete one temple and not the other does not make sense to me. MiraLantis 06:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Whoops. Forgot to add that the places of interest template is a long scroll down an empty page. I have a severe doubt that many users would think to scroll all that way when it seems the page is pretty blank. MiraLantis 06:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I could have sticked the images to the side to make the page smaller, but that would make the article look messed up ~ SCobra 16:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I still don't understand why one temple is able to listed and the other isn't. This isn't logical. MiraLantis 06:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Cause Temple of Grenth is already in the Landmarks template at the end of the page, Balthazar's isn't ~ SCobra 13:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Then why on the Temple of Grenth page is the temple of Lyssa displayed, even when it is displayed again in the Landmarks portion of the text? The landmarks portion details what is notable in the region; See Also displays things related to said article. (GW Player)--The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:71.164.131.76 (talk).

Cause its not suppose to be there. I removed it ~ SCobra 23:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Added See Also

I am in favour of both the other "temples" being listed in the see also section - even if one is already listed in the other landmarks for the southern shiverpeaks. I know it seems redundant but the reason to include it there is exclusive of what zone it is found in - the three structures are fairly unique in guild wars and seemingly connected to each other in their uniqueness. I think it is worth noting in each page the other two structure for that reason. If the Lyssa cave was found in Ascalon somewhere it would be listed in the see also section. I don't believe it's presence in the same region's landmarks is enough reason not to include it in see also, because that alone doesn't indicate it is part of a set of temples nor does it lead people to the other two similair temples. Someone interested in one of them would likely be interested in the other two for reasons of similarity other than it being a landmark. Druid 21:14, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Charr flame temple

Should it be noted that there was once a Charr flame temple inside the cave? You can still see the giant sacred flame braziers, knocked over and broken, that lie in ruin all around the inside of the cave. Silavor 11:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I always thought it was one of those Stone Summit light beacons, the ones you have to light in the borlis pass mission ~ Kurd 12:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Eh, you could be right there, too. Blame aNet for reskinning everything a billion times over, I suppose >.< Silavor 02:39, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

It's been a long time since I last was there, but doesn't that beacon/brazier/whatever-thing also pulsate and make a sound?

IMO, it's either a light beacon or something completely different. Perhaps the are wasn't always covered in ice.-- Cyberman 16:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

lol I always thought of it as a portal the titans used :P --MageMontu 16:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)