Talk:Speed clear

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Split proposal[edit]

Each of the four major speed clears is associated with a specific team build. IMO each of these builds is popular enough to warrant its' own build article. -- User Gordon Ecker sig.png Gordon Ecker (talk) 04:14, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

I agree.71.218.95.185 23:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
/agree -- Halogod35 User Halogod35 Sig.jpg 15:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, i suggested a merge with speed clear on Underworld Speed Clear and nobody opposed it, so this is why its like this -- as it is now with only 1 line of text for 1 of the 4 speed clears i oppose the split, untill somebody gets more info on all of them C4K3 User C4K3 Signature.jpg Talk 16:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I think that with help, I can design each page for these speed clears, as I do them all the time. I haven't done a MQSC before, but I candefinitely help with the UWSC and some of the FOWSC page. I completely support the split.

--Jrhsk8 04:01, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Since they are no content to split yet, I suggest to complete this article to have some overviews about these speed clears. Leaving the discussion of having fully detailed methods and articles for later. I have no idea if uwsc is or will still be possible or not but it should be kept for historical reason eventually Elephant 14:28, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

I completely agree with Elephant. Until there is content to be split there is no need to. Skykingcst 07:00, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Indeed, the page has not enough content for a split to be necessary. Apposed. Animalbrad 20:20, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

UWSC[edit]

Should be kept or have an article, even if it's nerfed. It played a significant role --User Karasu sig.png Karasu (talk) 02:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Sure, it's a major historical team build. -- User Gordon Ecker sig.png Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:21, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I think we should. I've heard it's still possible, but more difficult... --Juze 08:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Yup, definitely still possible for more experienced players; the current record is 25 minutes if I remember correctly (post-sliver-nerf). Power WMElementalist-tango-icon-200.png 03:22, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Historical. I lol'd. --BriarUser Briar Sig 3.jpgThe Spider 12:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

MTSC?[edit]

Shouldn't that be added to this list? Waar Kijk Je Naar 10:17, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

MT? Demonic Fahrir talk 10:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Morostav Trail. Less efficent Kurz farm. Backsword 23:41, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Expansion[edit]

I'd like to expand on this article a great deal. Adding things like SC basics, Strategies, and Goals. My only hang-up is that I don't know if I'm going to get brow-beaten for it again. So, Seeing as pretty much any topic I start up is doomed to receive no responses either way, I'll be adding a great deal of information to this page by the end of October. Assuming of course there is no logical dispute as to why I shouldn't (as opposed to simply saying we shouldn't document it because "hurr durr SF is for noobs").--BriarUser Briar Sig 3.jpgThe Spider 12:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Article splitting[edit]

I don't believe that each speed clear needs its own article; they're highly vulnerable to skill updates (even if we haven't had a big update for a while) and can change or even cease to be possible at any time. The article in its current format is sufficient and can quickly have certain speed clears added or deleted as necessary. At the very most, links to the relevant builds and/or pages on gwpvx.com should suffice. --KOKUOU 23:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Those are good points, and we're not here to document currently popular builds. But there may be other, more permanent parts, like the general concept of each sc. Might not be enough for an article to be helpful, but it is stuff we should documents. And redirects wouldn't hurt. Backsword 23:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Because[edit]

The pvx has moved to curse, would it not better to put this [[1]] in, instead?

Separate sc articles[edit]

This discussion might be pretty old, but i'd say each sc have a separate article to teach players how to do them. Even I would like to learn, for example, fowsc, uwsc, etc, so I guess we should provide the readers at least a short tutorial for each sc. MagnumUser_talk:Magnum 12:43, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

http://www.gwpvx.com/Portal:Speed_Clears -Auron 12:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
This hasn't really answered my suggestion. MagnumUser_talk:Magnum 18:21, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Are you proposing to write draft articles on quickly clearing one or more areas? That would be great (I happen to be in favor of seeing more Guide to XYZ articles). However, this article is about the concept of speed clearing and, as Auron implies, PvX already does this sort of thing and does it better than this wiki is likely to manage: a GWW guide needs to apply to most players, whereas clearing is a highly specialized activity that requires paying attention to minor details to optimize results.
Or, shorter story: I think we're covered for the moment. — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 19:31, 10 August 2011 (UTC)