User:Barek/archive 1

!

The following subjects are archived User talk:Barek discussions from February 2007 - June 2007. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. If you have additional comments, please create a new subject entry on User talk:Barek referencing to the original discussion(s) here.

Image Question

Image talk:Modti's Depravation.jpg - Can you look at that. Gares' pic was uploaded and I don't know if he allowed it. It's in the history and probably should be deleted yes?- BeXoR 01:12, 8 February 2007 (PST)

Policy pages?

So, where are the pages where they are discussing policy? I don't see anything linked off of the main page or the navi-bar. Oblio 08:02, 8 February 2007 (PST)

On the individual talk pages linked from Category:Policy_proposal. --Barek 08:05, 8 February 2007 (PST)

Getting Ready

I'd like to get your opinion on this. Thanks. — Gares 14:02, 11 February 2007 (PST)

A heads up

You may want to take a look at the recent entries in Special:Contributions/Blastedt. Please intervene. (xposted to other admin pages) S 19:01, 13 February 2007 (PST)

Thanks for the heads up. I just now saw the notice as I had something going late at work. It looks like Rainith and Gares have already addressed it. --Barek 20:00, 13 February 2007 (PST)

cite.php

Hey Barek, I noticed you added your request for cite.php directly to Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for technical administration. I guess you didn't notice that the procedure has changed: "If you feel you need a technical change to assist you, you should first make a proposal on the talk page." It probably doesn't matter too much at the moment, but the idea is that trivial or undesirable requests will never leave the talk page. :) LordBiro 14:15, 15 February 2007 (PST)

Ah - oops - I missed the procedure change - sorry. I'll move it to the talk page. --Barek 14:40, 15 February 2007 (PST)

My ban on GuildWiki

I created Alert after I lost my password to here, and mistyped my e-mail when I registered, so I didn't get the reset password email. I didn't realise that there was a new policy after the last time I looked (On [1]). I am putting this message here because I don't know how to contact you otherwise: I'm blocked from my own talk pages where I'm meant to dispute the ban if I think it is unfair. I do think it is unfair, it wasn't a disruptive account, and I just forgot to link through from one account to another on my Userpages. Ebany Salmonderiel 12:52, 20 February 2007 (PST)

So which is the active account that you want to use? User:Ebany Salmonderiel or User:Alert? Only the User:Alert account was blocked - User:Ebany Salmonderiel should still be working for you. If not, let me know and I'll see if I can spot why both were blocked. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:43, 20 February 2007 (PST)

Okay, I think I saw what went wrong. Try it again - I cleared and reset the block on the User:Alert account. The User:Ebany Salmonderiel should be free to post still. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:49, 20 February 2007 (PST)

Thanks, Barek. — Ebany Salmonderiel 08:58, 21 February 2007 (PST)

Hehe

This is pretty good. Kill the information we have been waiting for regarding official content. ;) — Gares 15:56, 23 February 2007 (EST)

I tagged it before realising who it was from, so removed the delete tag for now ... but, the article is redundant to the other one. And the other one is linked to from below the edit window anytime you edit text. We could migrate the information ourselves; but I would prefer if Emily did so the edit history has more authority to it. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:58, 23 February 2007 (EST)

Note: I suppose to maintain the edit history, we could do a "MOVE" on her entry over the existing other article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:59, 23 February 2007 (EST)

Strike that thought - Emily replied that additional information is coming that will make the two articles more clearly differentiated. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:07, 23 February 2007 (EST)

link bug?

Check out User:Oblio/Sandbox, notice on the sig, that the small "talk" link works. Now look at the talk link in User_talk:Oblio#Testing Small Link, that one doesn't work (it isn't linkified. To complicate matters, preview shows that this one works (on your talk page). -- Oblio (talk) 11:53, 26 February 2007 (EST)

No bug, the link is working as designed in the MediaWiki software. The link to the talk page at User_talk:Oblio#Testing Small Link is made on the talk page itself, so by design instead of creating a wiki link, it bolds that text (same as the talk link in my sig on my talk page). The same works from any page if a link on it points to the same page on which the link is posted, not just talk pages. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 11:57, 26 February 2007 (EST)

Makes sense, thanks! For whatever reason, I don't remember it working that way before. pax. -- Oblio (talk) 12:00, 26 February 2007 (EST)

Image placement

In response to this: I noticed you corrected some boss-articles on GuildWiki where I placed images in the 'Location'-section. I never quite understood why it shouldn't be placed there until I saw your comment.
I did some testing with IEv6, Firefox and Opera (my default browser) and found out that the large amounts of white space only occur with IE. FF and Opera just re-arrange the edit links. I tried disabling the section editing via [edit] links in "My Preferences", but it didn't change anything. I assume those links aren't removed, just made invisible because they only disappear when I'm logged in.
You probably already knew all of this, but maybe it's a good thing to mention it's a IE-specific problem (afaik) when correcting image-placement - spread the word :p --Erszebet 10:52, 2 March 2007 (EST)

You're right - I should've mentioned it in my post that it's specifically an IE6 issue (I'm stuck with IE6 only at work), I knew it didn't show that problem in FF, thanks for confirming it's not an issue on Opera as well (I never tested IE7 for it - I may do that tonight).

Ideally, any placement selected in the formatting show show cleanly in all major browsers, which is why I brought it up. But, as Rainith said, if we can embed the maps in the creature-info boxes, that'll eliminate the issue entirely. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:01, 2 March 2007 (EST)

Question

Hi, we're currently trying to create a formatting guide for NPCs, but so far without sufficient response. I'd appreciate it if you could drop by and leave your comment(s). Initial discussion started here, but is continued here. Thanks in advance ;). --Erszebet 09:34, 5 March 2007 (EST)

Reply posted at User_talk:Erszebet/NPCs. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 11:01, 5 March 2007 (EST)

Image Redirect

Hey, I was adding the {{user image}} to my user image that I u/l a long time ago and by placing it in there it no longer redirects to my user page. The redirect is listed under the template but it doesn't automatically redirect with it in there anymore. I tried moving the template after the redirect but it doesn't even show up when I do that. Any suggestions? I noticed yours do the same thing for your character icons.--Image:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 08:17, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

The template should be after the redirect if you want it to redirect. Unfortunately MediaWiki doesn't seem to show the template when you redirect, but that's ok. The reason the template exists is to avoid confusion that your image is official. Since it redirects to your user page there should (hopefully) be no such mistake. Also, your image is included in the user images category, so everything is fine. LordBiro 08:23, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Good to know. Thanks.--Image:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 08:30, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

I noticed the same issue - see Guild_Wars_Wiki_talk:User_page#A_problem_with_the_user_image_template. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 10:03, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Cool. Thanks. Good to know I'm not crazy.  :) Oh, and I have re-created the profession userboxes again (they are on my talk page) so feel free to distribute them as before (this is more for LordBiro as they use his icons) :D --Image:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 10:19, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Copyvio tag vs delete tag

You might want see this as you actually gave the hint to use the delete template. The copyvio template is meant to be used instead for copyvio articles. -- (gem / talk) 13:51, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Replied on the referenced talk page. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:57, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Anet member list

You just destroyed an hour worth of my work. I hope you're happy about that. I created stub pages for each of the staff members and there's no link that link to them. There's nothing wrong with having the staff list on the wiki, even if there are a list on an external link Lightblade 16:21, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

I already posted on your talk page. The list already exists internally on another page. For such a long list, we're far better off using the already existing and more complete game credits article, rather than reproducing the same list in multiple places. It's an ease of maintenance thing. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:22, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Skill Effect Template

This will be really handy, since I've been steadily working through warrior skills. Thanks. Arkhar 18:19, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Hey :P

Hey, it's Barek XD. My fav Admin from Guildwiki is on this site also. How convenient...well ttyl.--Eloc 19:44, 28 March 2007 (EDT)

Stub Formatting

Ok, we all know that by typing {{stub}} we get . But where do I find the page so that I can see what the coding is for it?--Eloc 02:13, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Template:Stub? - BeXoR 04:49, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Another formatting question

How can I set one of my pages, such as this one to be used with I type in {{build-stub}}?--Eloc 15:29, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Please wait for this site's build policy to be finalised before creating your own. It'll be far better if everyone followed the same methods, rather than everyone having their own private methods. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:43, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

{{x}} only works with articles in the template namespace, as that is the default, everything else needs the full path. which is another reason to wait for a build policy. --Lemming64 21:45, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

It works here in the user namespace: --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:54, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Yes, but I just want a shortcut to use whenever for my own personal user page. It would be alot faster than going to the page then copying and pasting.--Eloc 02:03, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

{{User:Eloc Jcg/Templates/Build Stub}} - BeXoR 09:58, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

Gash

Ok, I did this page from scratch and I am quite proud of my self XD. Did I do it all right or did I miss something?--Eloc 19:46, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

A fierce revert war rages

Might want to take a look at [2] >.< — Skuld 11:08, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

It's not a revert war really, apart from Santax and Wings in the end. Most people are adding comments which Wings removes. As far as I know, blanking your talk page is not against any policy, although I generally don't like it. The small revert war could probably be ignored. -- (gem / talk) 11:20, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

There is a comment on user pages in GWW:USER. I've actually been meaning to ask about it - because I'm not sure if my navigation tools at the top of this page violate the "no special formatting" rule on it. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 11:22, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

I just found about the rule, althoug hI had been taking part in the discussion about it when the policy was formed. :D Wings should not be blanking the page then, whih I now told him.

What comes to the navboxes etc, I don't think they are 'special formatting'. Special formatting means a font color, tables and other stuff that users tried to use to change the looks of the whole talk page. -- (gem / talk) 11:27, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

Pics

How do I upload pictures onto GWW?--Eloc 18:12, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

Special:Upload.

Btw, IRC = Internet Relay Chat. --Dirigible 18:15, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

Admin noticeboard

Heya, Barek. As you suggested at Template_talk:Admin review, the admin noticeboard is now up. :)

(By the way, the link at the top of this page "Please start new messages at the bottom of the page" points to GuildWiki.) --Dirigible 18:05, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

Redirect policy

What are the redirect policies for GWW? If there is one can you direct me to it? Lightblade 12:05, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

Here you go: Help:Redirect. MisterPepe talk 12:20, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

The policy is: "Make as many redirects as you like". Pretty much anyway :) LordBiro 12:51, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

anon contributor - userpages in main namespace

I already left a message on the IP's talk page, but he/she doesn't seemed to have noticed it. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 21:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

You beat me to it on the Guild page - after about 8 or so of the other pages I guessed the same you did that they probably had a memberlist somewhere with all links. I was going to remove it but went to edit and noticed they weren't links any more in the edit box. Cheers. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 21:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

how do i delete it

I accidently put thatt staff on(thought it was the sandbox) 87.113.6.86 00:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Anyone can add a delete tag. Then admins review those tags, and they're the only ones who can actually delete it ... as you say it was created in the wrong space, I went ahead and deleted it. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks87.113.6.86 00:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Blessing page

Is it really necessary to have pages for each individual blessing? There's really nothing more to write besides its descriptions. I would remove those red links and redirect the individual blessing to the blessing page. Lightblade 20:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Well Barek, if you're not going to reply, I'm just going to go ahead and merge them. Lightblade 19:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

I honestly have no idea what articles you are talking about. Can you provide links to the articles or their talk pages where it's being discussed? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Alright here it is: Blessing

What change are you wanting to make to the page? Forgive me, but I'm just not seeing the red links you mentioned. The edit history doesn't show a change recently by you on that page, so I'm not sure what you want to change (or already did change). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I think he wants to merge the incuded pages into one, which I don't think is a good idea, considering once the avatar articles are made, they would be used again there separately. - BeX 15:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

He mentioned wanting to remove red links, which confused me. If it's about wanting to merge the blessing pages, I think it's best to keep them as inclusions for the reason given by BeXoR. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I figured out what he did. In the included pages they were previously using the skill icon template. Check out Blessing/Dwayna. I don't know if those articles will ever be made or if they really need to be. - BeX 15:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I see it now, thanks for finding that!

I agree, no need to have links to those individual blessings pages. We might one day want to create them as redirects back to either the general Blessing page, or the Avatar articles (or a disambig for both); but certainly no reason to link to the individual ones from the Blessing/Dwayna, etc pages. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandal ?

cur) (last) 00:56, 30 May 2007 Barek (Talk | contribs) m (Undo revision 135142 by Special:Contributions/Arcane Law (User talk:Arcane Law) rv vandalism of user page content)

the page : http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User:Stee was unaproperiet and had meaningless content if i cannot simply delete rubbish like this what do i do do i report it ..? if so how ? --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Arcane Law .

It's a user page. Unless it's a violation of GWW:USER, leave it alone. While that one WAS created in the main namespace, Barek moved it into the Userspace, where it belongs. Really, there's nothing that you should report or deal with there =) MisterPepe talk 01:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

ok thanks jsut wanted to help do my bit for the comunity by removing mindless junk nevermind :D

Re: Redirects

I added my thoughts to the talk you noted for me - and thanks for bringing my attention to it (esp. as I wasn't the one who had tagged them the second time.) :) (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 20:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

GRRRRrr! Ok Im stuck and cant figure this out. I think I have 2 user pages going on with the same stuff on it. I somehow moved it a while back and cant seem to fix it now. Can someone please help me with this bit of frustration?? Scars reminder 09:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Undiscussed changes

I do apologize again for the undiscussed changes I made to the warrior list of skills. And for not signing my last message. (Not even sure if I did the message right or not.) It was my hope to make the page more user friendly. But after reviewing my previous version I am forced to agree that it may not have been the proper format for the information being displayed. Because of this I would like to submit a new idea for the format. I have posted it on my Talk page under the article tab so you can review and accept or deny it before I place it on the main wiki area for all to view. I hope u will give it earnest consideration and offer any suggestions that may improve it further. If it is an acceptable format I would like permission to exchange the formats of the rest of the skill pages to this one over time. Your consideration on this matter is welcomed and appreciated. Thank you in advance. Scars reminder 06:02, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I have reviewed the changes you suggested and I must admit they look much better. Not as complicated. Thanks for the suggestion. Also, like I said before, I'm still new to the wiki setup. I am not sure how to post my site link in the community portal or the other suggested site page. Please be patient with me as I am learning. I will attempt to do that tonight.Scars reminder 21:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I have set up a blog in the community portal discussion page entitled "New Ideas for an Old Format". And it seems to be getting quite a bit of attention. Thank you for the suggestions.Scars reminder 20:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

OK! What Gives?! I was told to discuss and advertise possible changes. Now I see someone else changed to format of the skills page to something of another poor quality list that still has no clear distinction or system of defining and improving. I can't locate any mentioning of the change anywhere and there was no discussion of this with anyone. Please excuse me if I sound curt, but I worked hard at the first change I made and it was deleted almost instantly because, I was told, I had to discuss it. I have certainly extended every effort to do just that. Now I see this and I don't understand how this occurred without notice of some kind. Have I just waisted my time on trying to improve the skills list by going through the proper steps and taking time to get responses?? Or is there more to this situation that I don't understand?? Please let me know I would greatly appreciate it.Scars reminder 07:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Relax man, if people really like your formatting better, yours will replace the current one. I told you before, major changes need to be discussed, and your change (sorting skills according to campaign) is not really helpful and it's too big of a change. The change made by the other guy is mearly reformat it into a table, and that's a minor change. Lightblade 08:29, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

I do apologize for jumping the gun there. But I have to disagree with the uselessness thing. There is already a page in Wiki that is dedicated to the List of skills by campaign and it is understandable why it is there. It isn't very popular though because it lists every skill, every profession, and every campaign all on the same page. In truth it takes forever to populate the information on it. It is also difficult to follow due to repetition of each class in each campaign. The current skills list by profession is a much cleaner way of showing the skills available and with the change I am offering will combine information from both pages and make it easier to research skills. Please keep in mind, not all players have all 3 campaigns, and reading each listed skill for the current (core),(prophecies), etc.. can be quite time consuming. But again, thank you for your patience with my noob style of thinking. LOL Scars reminder 09:10, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

The current change to the page didn't modify the basic structure of how the skills are listed on the page, it just converted the single column into three columns with no change to the sorting or basic structure, so that's a very minor change. Modifying the structure by sorting by campaign is a bigger modification. Personally, I like having the skills listed by campaign on the lists - I do find it helpful, but it's up to the community to decide on if a restructure of how the skills are organized is to be implemented. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Image protection

Let me know if it works. :) -- (gem / talk) 19:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

It didn't appear to do so as I could still see the upload option; but the Sysop abilities may allow it regardless. We need to protect it, then have someone without Sysop access take a look to have a real test. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Tested with User:GemTest. I was unable to upload a file after protecting the page. Yay! -- (gem / talk) 19:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Stupid bug.

If i seek : Dutch Gladiator Team . i find nothing but i have maken 1. Or : Demon Of Holy Fire . but i have maken 1. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Demon Of Holy Fire (talk • contribs) 15:55, July 7, 2007 (UTC).

When you do a search, go to the bottom of the results page and make sure that the "Guild" and "User" boxes are checked, then re-click the "Search" box under/next to the check boxes.

To have those boxes checked by default, go to the upper right and click on "my preferences", choose the "Search" tab, and ensure that the Guild and User boxes are checked, then click "Save". --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Oke thanks Barek.

(¤-:¦ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Demon Of Holy Fire (talk • contribs) 18:14, July 7, 2007 (UTC).

Whoosh!

You are awfully quick ;) You almost delete stuff before they are tagged. :P - anja 16:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks ... I should've mentioned "speedy I1: redundant/superceded images" in my delete reasons though - minor error on my part. ----The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Barek .16:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Would you mind if I copied your "your edits appear to be vandalism"-message that you put on their talk pages? I find it really good and I don't have the energy to write a personalized one every time. You seem to write them so fast I imagine you also just copypaste them? - anja 17:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

No problem ... you're right, I just copy/paste it ... the source is here. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Let's make a template, then get poke to put it in GWWT :) --Lemming64 17:18, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

I agree, something like this would be really neat in GWWT, I think he's already working on it. But making it a template would make it alot easier for him I guess :) Plus it makes it usable to those not using extra tools :) - anja 17:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

prod

Since you seem to be online at the moment - perhaps you'd care to take a glance at Talk:Guild_Wars_Eye_of_the_North - it seems it's become a little heated. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 03:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll take a look. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Guild Page?

Hello

I'm new to GWW and just finished up my Guild's page. Guild:The Myrmidon Elite I talked with a friend of mine who knows the site well and he said to prevent vandalism on my page I would need to contact a Sysop to protect it. I'm here to ask you if you could do that. =) I apologize for any ignorance on my part, as again, I'm new to the site. Thank you for your help. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Rurik Jangeer .

Hi. Only very few pages on this wiki are protected, and a regular guild page will not be protected unless it becomes a target of mass vandalism, in which case we would probably protect the page temporarily. However, any vandalism gets usually reverted very quickly, in a matter of minutes, so this shouldn't be a problem at all.

Btw, you can sign your comments with four tildes ( ~~~~ ) -- (gem / talk) 07:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

message

go to my page for a message to all admins and tell all the admins you know to go to it Priestess donut 05:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

already posted to your talk page before seeing your post here. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Question

Is there an easy way to check someone elses contributions? Vengeance Signet 21:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

On their user page, in the toolbar on the lower left should be a link titled "User contributions". That will show a list of contributions made by that other user. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. =D Vengeance Signet 21:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations

I can't believe no one has congratulated you on getting married :P CONGRATULATIONS!!!! -- Scourge 21:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, wow, hadn't noticed that. That's terrific, Barek! :) --Dirigible 22:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

yeah.. gz (Teo / talk) 22:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Congrats indeed! --Xasxas256 00:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Great news! Hope you have a great wedding! -- ab.er.rant 03:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks everyone! So far, we just have a location and a date in 2008 ... so a lot of arrangements left to work out yet ahead of us. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

I feel bad for not noticing! Sorry man... and congrats :D \o/ LordBiro 07:56, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

ArbComm decision

The decision for the case for arbitration you brought up is at Guild Wars Wiki talk:User page#ArbComm decision. --Rezyk 23:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Response

HI Barek.... I saw your comment and posted a reply for you. Chik En 03:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

71.251.192.137

Thanks for reverting it back further, I must have missed something trying to clean it up. 'twas my first revert, which is kinda funny since it happened while I was more or less looking right at it. Nbajammer 21:53, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Picture

Okay, I'm curious as to where you are in the picture (since we didn't think to figure a way to meet when we were there).  :) I found myself (barely) in the back and I had a couple guesses as to who you were at the party, but if you want to let me know if I was right, drop me a line.  ;) --Rainith 02:14, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

I was wondering where that picture had gotten posted. It took a bit to locate myself in the picture, I'm almost hidden in the back row! I'll send an email pointing myself out. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

The new skill list page

I like the new skill lists! But are we going to make all the skill lists to look like that? Some pages like Well spell also contains skill lists, but they're not sorted list. Lightblade 03:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Error code

What happened to the error code page? I was patrolling recent change and found this talk page asking about error code. When I searched for Error 7, I get nothing. Lightblade 03:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

As far as I can recall we don't and never had a page about the error codes. Guildwiki does though - could it be that you're confusing the two? - BeX 03:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Maybe I am, but that doesn't means we shouldn't have an error code page. Lightblade 04:29, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Of course! It's just a matter of finding someone that wants to write it. :P - BeX 07:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

And one that's not plagiarized from guildwiki =.= Lightblade 10:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

A small thing

Just a quick request, when you're moving content from one page to another, in addition to adding a {{move}} could you also just at least put "moved" or something in both change notes? It's sort of odd for me when I go to look at a change and see a giant character difference number and can't tell off the bat whether it was a fix of vandalism or a pagemove. :) (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 00:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

I normally do ... sorry, must've forgotten this time. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Fansites

I started up the article, category and corrected the links, still waiting for entries though. Thought you might be interested. --Xeeron 12:03, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

I had noticed that no one was working on it yet, so was thinking of starting it this weekend. I'm glad to see you got it moving! --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Wait, now I'm confused. The article that you created is a sortable table, like what I was arguing we should create ... weren't you the one arguing against using that and wanting a bullet point list instead? Or were we just working under different personal definitions of what ended up being the same thing? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

I think the latter. The only distinction I saw between various proposals really was whether to have separate pages for each site or one consolidated list. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 17:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, I have the slightest preference for list, but since I thought you wanted a table, I started out that way. Doesnt matter much to me. Advantage of a list being that it is easier to use for new/anon users, but lets wait if we get some edits. --Xeeron 19:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

The table does allow a bit more flexibility with sorting, so I suppose it's a tossup. (Aiiane - talk - contribs) 00:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Current wiki-dramas

Note the title of this section is plural. Over the last week, I've received emails from three people asking for my input on two issues on the wiki. If these issues had been of a critical nature, I would've been happy to contribute - but for the multiple political wiki-dramas taking place, I only skimmed a handful of posts before deciding that I really don't want anything to do with either issue. The wiki talk pages have become a hostile and unpleasant place to roam, so I'll only be looking into a handful of talk pages for a while. I have enough more enjoyable activities going on in real life to keep me busy. I may be back, I may not. Time will tell. For now, I've set my preferences to not receive emails, and have removed the link from my user pages to avoid confusion. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

That's the healthiest thing I've read in the last two years. —Tanaric 00:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

That entirely depends on your definition of "healthy". The sun is trying to kill me. -- Ĵĩôřũĵĩ Đēŗāķō.>.cнаt^ 02:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Quick Access links

Thank you for chiming in to the discussion regarding this issue. I've been working for over 2 months to get this happening here.-- Wynthyst 18:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

dude..

empty? you can't have it this way.. seriusly ^Teo^ 00:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)