User talk:Indochine
From Guild Wars Wiki
|
Talk |
Welcome to my talk page, Please feel free to ask any question below, but, please, make a new section. Thanks.
/Archive Last Archive was at: 18:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:User Anti PvX.jpg
I am pretty sure it qualifies for G6, the policy doesnt state that G6 is only for articles :P --Shadowphoenix
17:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Possibly, but I think tagging it as a copyvio is more important. --
Indochine talk 17:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Here and there you also claim this to be a copyvio. Do you have anything to back that up? Please understand that I am not saying that it isn't; I just believe that one should assume good faith and since it appears to be a modification of an ArenaNet image they would still hold the copyright which would make it fine to be here, although it should then be tagged as ArenaNet owned. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Inspired (talk).
- See http://www.pvxwiki.com/wiki/PvXwiki_talk:Community_Portal#Copyright_on_PvX_logo. --
Indochine talk 19:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about forgetting to sign and thanks for the link. Following that thru the chain of provided links revealed the apparently true source of this image from the person who claimed to have made it as: "edited NCsoft's Guild Wars' Warrior concept art they have on their website, made a pretty decent icon to replace the default low res warrior helmet icon." Thus, ArenaNet would hold the copyright on the image. Now, the only question that remains is whether ArenaNet has a problem with the use of modified images on this wiki; and I for one hope not because there seem to be very many. -- Inspired to ____ 19:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Until Anet has a problem with the artist who originally posted it on Deviant Art, it's not for us to say it's an Anet owned image. The fact that the PvX wiki license and the GWW license are incompatible makes it unusable here.--
Wynthyst 20:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Well, as far as we're concerned, the image is used as their logo and released under their licence. Until we know for sure, it's a copyvio on here. --
Indochine talk 20:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, and that tree icon used in your signature looks like it may be a copyvio to me, but if you can "prove" it's not so that "we know for sure" then I suppose I won't have to tag it for deletion. -- Inspired to ____ 20:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- An unless u can provide a source that it is a copvio, then I am afraid I will have to revert it --Shadowphoenix
20:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Someone may fail at sarcasm. At least Shadowphoenix may be starting to figure out where the "proof" needs to be for a copyvio. -- Inspired to ____ 20:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- We have provided you with proof, and u still did not accept it. Lets drop this and let ArenaNet decide ok :) --Shadowphoenix
20:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- What Shadophoenix said. Now leave my tree alone :/ --
Indochine talk 20:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- What Shadophoenix said. Now leave my tree alone :/ --
- We have provided you with proof, and u still did not accept it. Lets drop this and let ArenaNet decide ok :) --Shadowphoenix
- Someone may fail at sarcasm. At least Shadowphoenix may be starting to figure out where the "proof" needs to be for a copyvio. -- Inspired to ____ 20:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- See here My sig is a modified version, the original image was relased under the GFDL. --
Indochine talk 20:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- An unless u can provide a source that it is a copvio, then I am afraid I will have to revert it --Shadowphoenix
- Yes, and that tree icon used in your signature looks like it may be a copyvio to me, but if you can "prove" it's not so that "we know for sure" then I suppose I won't have to tag it for deletion. -- Inspired to ____ 20:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Well, as far as we're concerned, the image is used as their logo and released under their licence. Until we know for sure, it's a copyvio on here. --
- Until Anet has a problem with the artist who originally posted it on Deviant Art, it's not for us to say it's an Anet owned image. The fact that the PvX wiki license and the GWW license are incompatible makes it unusable here.--
- Sorry about forgetting to sign and thanks for the link. Following that thru the chain of provided links revealed the apparently true source of this image from the person who claimed to have made it as: "edited NCsoft's Guild Wars' Warrior concept art they have on their website, made a pretty decent icon to replace the default low res warrior helmet icon." Thus, ArenaNet would hold the copyright on the image. Now, the only question that remains is whether ArenaNet has a problem with the use of modified images on this wiki; and I for one hope not because there seem to be very many. -- Inspired to ____ 19:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- See http://www.pvxwiki.com/wiki/PvXwiki_talk:Community_Portal#Copyright_on_PvX_logo. --
- Here and there you also claim this to be a copyvio. Do you have anything to back that up? Please understand that I am not saying that it isn't; I just believe that one should assume good faith and since it appears to be a modification of an ArenaNet image they would still hold the copyright which would make it fine to be here, although it should then be tagged as ArenaNet owned. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Inspired (talk).
[edit] Not that someone cares, but...
You may want to |15px your sig in order to meet the 19px height limit on signature images.--Fighterdoken 06:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Pretty bad lol, how long has he had that? xD Halogod35
06:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- If i had to guess... 6 months maybe? That is why the "nobody cares" title XD.--Fighterdoken 06:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Lol fail... xDDD also, lmao at indent. Halogod35
06:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- I've only been this sig for less than a month, but yeah, nobody cares :P Thanks anyway.. What is Halogod35 going on about..? :O --
Indochine talk 15:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oh nothing, people fail at indenting things. :P Halogod35
08:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oh nothing, people fail at indenting things. :P Halogod35
- Lol fail... xDDD also, lmao at indent. Halogod35
- If i had to guess... 6 months maybe? That is why the "nobody cares" title XD.--Fighterdoken 06:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] *whistle*
*whistle* first after archive *whistle* - Y0_ich_halt
18:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Grats. :P --
Indochine talk 18:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- And you were saying yourself that this is only fun to a certain point the other day. I will never trust you Yo. :P - anja
22:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Y0 makes it cool. Everyone else simply does it wrong. --
Brains12 \ talk 22:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- you're talking about what i said on phoenix' talk? what i meant there was that it just got too much. i mean, wth, thirteen headers for that? over there it was really no better, much more even worse, than those wtf-pyramids on PvX. - Y0_ich_halt
12:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- you're talking about what i said on phoenix' talk? what i meant there was that it just got too much. i mean, wth, thirteen headers for that? over there it was really no better, much more even worse, than those wtf-pyramids on PvX. - Y0_ich_halt
- Y0 makes it cool. Everyone else simply does it wrong. --
[edit] Birthday..
HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!! right..? D: Halogod35
04:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Grats :D - anja
08:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed a happy bithday! :) -- Silverleaf
08:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- happy bday ^,^ - Y0_ich_halt
12:16, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Happy Bday :D --Shadowphoenix
15:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Happy. Birthday. :D Calor
18:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Happy. Birthday. :D Calor
- happy bday ^,^ - Y0_ich_halt
- Indeed a happy bithday! :) -- Silverleaf
Thanks all :P --
Indochine talk 15:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Happy Birthday Indochine :) --Kakarot
22:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Happy B-Day :) I never look at GWW:BDAY timely :P —Zerpha
The Improver 12:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks Zerpha, no problem :D --
Indochine talk 09:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks Zerpha, no problem :D --
- Happy B-Day :) I never look at GWW:BDAY timely :P —Zerpha
- Happy Birthday Indochine :) --Kakarot
[edit] Thx
Thx for that I'm just trying to fix up peoples userboxes. Delete the apple icon as well while youre at it — Renuro Seru
Talk 18:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- No probs :P --
Indochine talk 18:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- Why hasnt the vista icon been deleted yet? — Renuro Seru
Talk 18:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- It'll be deleted soon.... :D --
Indochine talk 19:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- CAn't we just put a marker on it that says borrowed image don't use elsewhere? — Renuro Seru
Talk 19:18, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- No, we can't. It's not as simple as that - Arenanet have to allow it first which they won't. --
Indochine talk 19:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
- No, we can't. It's not as simple as that - Arenanet have to allow it first which they won't. --
- CAn't we just put a marker on it that says borrowed image don't use elsewhere? — Renuro Seru
- It'll be deleted soon.... :D --
- Why hasnt the vista icon been deleted yet? — Renuro Seru
| | This User hates dealing with the GFDL and other copyrights. |
- The previously mentioned Vista icon is NOT a Windows icon, it's a user created icon. I does not need to be deleted per copyright. That's why it has been around since August of 2007.--
Wynthyst 04:10, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- The previously mentioned Vista icon is NOT a Windows icon, it's a user created icon. I does not need to be deleted per copyright. That's why it has been around since August of 2007.--
[edit] Copyvio
Not sure if this counts, but Regina's sig is of a Metroid from the Metroid series of games. Might wanna check in to that (; —Utopian ♫ 04:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- The metroid icon was made by User:AT who released it under GFDL; I don't think it violates anything. (although it may) --Shadowphoenix
04:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out to me. I did a quick look and the icon is obviously based on this, but I think AT made the icon from scratch, i.e. not a derivative work.... Whether that would count as a copyvio, being all his own work, I'm not sure, but I'll speak to AT and do a bit more research see what I find. --
Indochine talk 15:10, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Psst
Does this look like a copyvio to you? — ク Eloc 貢 21:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

