User talk:Life Infusion

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

User JS[edit]

Hello. You recently Opposed a request for user JS to be enabled on the wiki, and I'm not sure whether this was because of a genuine disagreement, or because of a simple misunderstanding. Stabber made another edit to try and clarify that passage. This (and user CSS also) ONLY affects the user who uses it, and no one else but him. So, someone can use a piece of code which destroys how the pages look, but this will only affect him personally; for everyone else the wiki works as usual. This JS code is served to no other user but the guy who has directly decided to use them. Does that make sense? --Dirigible 18:34, 14 February 2007 (PST)

Hmm, Dirigible beat me here, but yes, I echo his comment above. Are you opposed to JS because of the potential for abuse? If so, can you modify your oppose vote to make it clear that you understand what user JS does and how it may be abused? From your oppose vote right now it is not clear that you understand what user JS does. Thanks. S 18:41, 14 February 2007 (PST)

Your user page[edit]

Hi. According to the user page policy the main user page of a user should not be longer than 3 screens on 1024x768 resolution, but your user page is 4 screens long. Would you please remove/split content? REmoving the table of contents might be enough. Thanks and sorry for the trouble. -- Gem (gem / talk) 09:00, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Actually I haven't been on GW, Guildwiki, and the official Wiki for a bit. --Life Infusion «T» 16:01, 10 March 2007 (EST)
Your user page is so plain now. :( -- Gem (gem / talk) 16:04, 10 March 2007 (EST)

Skill feedback[edit]

Hey there, please make sure you replace all the <!-- instruction --> with what it tells you to on Izzy's skill feedback pages. It just makes sure it's kept organised and easy to respond to. Thanks. --User Brains12 Spiral.png Brains12 \ Talk 19:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Izzy[edit]

You're posting so much, that's why he doesn't want to comment, you're pointing out every single tiny flaw in a skill when Izzy obviously knows they are bad and aren't used. For the sake of the rest of us (and Izzy), can you try and take it easy so he doesn't rage quit again? — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 03:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I aggree, your suggestions are probably the worst. Stop doing it or make good ones plz cuz thanks to you izzy doesnt look at the balance page. Dark Morphon(contribs) 14:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Glad u r not a skill balancer. I cry at ur every post.--74.61.209.219 06:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Me or JS? Dark Morphon(contribs) 16:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I find it funny since I haven't been on this wiki for this week and my talk page got turned into a chatroom.--Life Infusion «T» 14:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
1 post with 3 reactions is nothing, believe me. But plz listen to skakid cuz your suggestions r sucky. Dark Morphon(contribs) 11:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Don't be cruel to him. He's doing his best to think of inventive ways to balance skills. So if you don't like it I suggest you go post some helpful ones yourself. They do have a small point, though.--192.168.1.1 16:32, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Because anons are to be taken seriously mirite? Dark Morphon(contribs) 10:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)