User talk:NuclearVII

From Guild Wars Wiki

[edit] Welcome (1)

Hi. Welcome to GWW. -- Brains12 \ Talk 18:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Eh, deja vu much? just here to speak with Izzy. Nukleaer VII Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 18:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Screw you Brains. Welcoming members is my job. lol. — ク Eloc 貢 18:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I would laugh if that wasn't so true ... (lol) --

Brains12 \ Talk 18:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Eh, I already have been welcomed, kthnxbai.... Nukleaer VII Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 18:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

You'll need to reupload your sig image to User NuclearVII sig image2.jpg, and then do the same on GW2W seeing as the preferences are linked. Guild Wars Wiki:Image use has the info. --

Brains12 \ Talk 20:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome (2)

Hello, NuclearVII, and welcome to the Official Guild Wars Wiki! If you need help with anything, don't hesitate to add a message to my talk page. I highly recommend that you check out the "Welcome to the wiki" page - it's extremely useful as an initial guide. Best of luck and happy editing! --Cursed Angel 01:19, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

OMG OMG I AM OFFENDED TO NO DEGREE BAN CURSEL PSLSLSLLS! I HATE LIFE WIKI AND GW OMG OMG ZOMG...Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg nuke7 Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 14:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

You probably know this, but you can only have one image in your sig, and the image should be named as said above. --

Brains12 \ Talk 15:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Eh, you are more than welcome to slap a delete tag on it. I really don't care how fugly my sig looks here, 'cause it looks funkeh in GW2W, Plin(g*6). Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg nuke7 Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 14:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Whats wrong with it? Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg nuke7 Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 20:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signature

Your signature is broken. — ク Eloc 貢 01:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

What's wrong with it? Wrong section, soz Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg nuke7 Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 20:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Namely, the images don't seem to exist, so we just get a looooong bit of red links telling us that you seem to have intended to have images in it. Perhaps you should re-upload the sig image (probably named User NuclearVII sig image; i'm guessing the old one was deleted for not having the right name). - THARKUN

21:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

but then, I'd have to reupload that image back at GWW2 too! I can't be arsed to do that... what is wrorng with the reddies?

No, actually your image works on GW2W, though the naming is the same as here and this one got deleted - you might have to change if a userpage/signature policy is ratified over there. And there's nothing wrong per se with the red links.. they're just long and kind of annoying.

Technically, too, since you use nuke7 in your signature, you should register the username nuke7 and just have it redirect to your (NuclearVII) userpage.. though I can't find where that is in policy; perhaps someone else will hop in and help. See Help:Redirect for how to set up the redir. Also, for more details on images, see: GWW:SIGN#Images. - THARKUN

21:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

What a waste of.. anyway, fine, I'll register nuke7, but not now. Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg nuke7 Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 16:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

You don't need to do it with the current SIGN. That part forcing people to register the shoepuppet was one of the changes in the accepted proposal - however, if someone else registers as nuke7, you should change your signature to a more appropriate name. "While not an absolute requirement, it is common practice for a signature to resemble to some degree the user name it represents. " is the most it elaborates in regards to shortened signature names. --

Brains12 \ Talk 17:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Plinggggggg.Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg nuke7 Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 17:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Wait, isn't this finally a wrong image naming? GWW:IMAGE says that user images should be prefixed by Image:User <username>, as your images are more or less named Image:<username>, they got deleted because of wrong naming. Finally, you would REALLY do a favor for me if you'd remove these two huge red links left and right around your name from your sig, i start getting an infarction everytime i have to look at this. (GWW:SIGN doesn't directly say it, but it adds up to this...) —Zerpha

The Improver 00:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

My beef is that if I change my sig here, It becomes a problem in GWW2. Uploading all of it feels like quite a hassle, and since the policies that screw up my sig also don't care of it as it is, I plan to leave it as a sign of pure anarchy. I know, it looks horrible. maybe - one day, I'll fix it, but since there is nothing forcing my hand now, I'd rather procrastinate. In other words, the policies is the scorpion, I'm the one drawing the gasoline circle and tossing the candle. Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg nuke7 Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 00:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Should only have one image, not two. As the naming is incorrect, I've had to tag that for deletion. I'm sure you can find a compromise for the two wikis, but as of now, you shouldn't have the sig like that. --

Brains12 \ Talk 01:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

It was okay when I didn't have any images at all. Now I HAVE to fix it. grrr.. Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg nuke7 Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 11:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Fixed. -- nuke7 Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 11:11, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :) --

Brains12 \ Talk 15:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) made some font proposals on CA's page. (i was mainly geared at other user's sigs) —Zerpha The Improver 20:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay, how'd I make a template for my siggy? nuke7 20:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Language

I'm a couple of days late, having not seen the discussion until now, but could you keep your language a little more clean please? The whole point of the skill feedback pages are to get Izzy to read them - with the language like that, I doubt that would even happen (assuming, of course, that he reads the discussion pages). Not only is it for him, but that sort of language just riles up other people and it'll end up in a flame war. Thanks -- Brains12 \ Talk 15:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

FLAMEWAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111 --Cursed Angel

15:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I know. I was having a bad day. Won't happen again unless I become very unfortunate and have other bad days again. Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg nuke7 Image:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 15:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I will have to second Brains' opinion that your continued use of profanity on prominent talk pages is inappropriate [1] and I would like to ask you to refrain.--

Wynthyst 15:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My new siggy

I'm sure I did something wrong... but hey, looks hawt. NUKLEAR Image:Image-User NuclearVII signature 3.jpgIIV 20:57, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

The size is a little too big. Also, you're not supposed to use a template to substitute it in. You could probably shorten the code down a bit though:

 [[User:NuclearVII|<span style="font-family:Castellan;color:#ff0000">'''''NUKLEAR'''''</span>]] [[Image:User NuclearVII signature 3.jpg|19x19px|Burn!]][[User talk:NuclearVII|<span style="font-family:Castellan;color:#ff0000">'''''IIV'''''</span>]]

gets NUKLEAR Image:Image-User NuclearVII signature 3.jpgIIV and it fits in the nickname thing.

The code is still quite long though, so you may want to think about taking some stuff out. --

Brains12 \ Talk 22:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, and by the way, you'll need to reupload it to Image:User NuclearVII signature 3.jpg. --

Brains12 \ Talk 22:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

you. have. to. be. joking. But that's what I named it! graghhh! fine, THIS IS IT: nuke7 09:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks mate. Fixed it. I'm not making another sig again, too much fucking work. NUKLEAR

IIV 09:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

That's great, thanks :P --

Brains12 \ Talk 12:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

according to y:our sandbox, you had even fun creating it :P —Zerpha

The Improver 20:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

no, srsly. I'm not making one again. It's either this or I'm pulling an auron. (Btw, you should see my other sandbox!) NUKLEAR

IIV 20:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Huh? since when can one indicate users in units? and what other sandbox? —Zerpha

The Improver 20:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

the one at GWW2. Pulling an auron is liek making a signature like auron. Pulling a zerpha would be: Nuclear

VII 20:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)~

lol -- $Pling! \$ Brains12 \ Talk 20:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

lol -- $Pling! \$ Cursed12 \ Talk 20:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

It suits you :P -- $Pling! \$ Brains12 \ Talk 21:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

lol! xD --—Zerp

lingggggg 21:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Ur doing it rong!!! -- $Pling! \$ NuclearVII \ Talk 23:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)~

no u. the VII should be a 12 instead. -- $Pling! \$ Zerpha12 \ Talk 13:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Damn that's too many Brains spirals, confused me for a minute lol and no I won't be... --Kakarot

13:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

why not? pulling a user is fun, isn't it? :D --Zerpha

The Improver 20:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 13:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Ya rly. --NuclearVII

20:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cracked armor

You should learn more about cracked armor, cause it is very powerful condition, I think, not only in TA:-) --Rain4est 00:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

" Originally Posted by GW Official Wiki - (Dev Update) Skill Balances and PvP Changes -- 12 June 2007 General. We added a cap of +25 to the armor buff when stacking skills. A single skill can still bring the bonus over +25, but multiple skills with smaller bonuses will not do so. Armor bonuses from shields, weapons, insignias and inscriptions are not affected and still stack."

Which means ... I think you can figure out:D

You should learn that no serious player depends on armor to protect theor asses. Extra armor is a luxury, not a necessity. People can, and usually do survive with 60 armor. If you depend on having 80 armor to survive, well, gl&hf. And, how do you apply it with? Weaken armor? So, you use a bad curses skill to apply a meager pressure condition which will be fed to the other team's RC? Do you know why people choose to avoind needless condition application? THIS. Things like Apply poison are better because poison spreading usually does more damage than CA it self. NUKLEAR

IIV 08:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Who takes RC to TA/HA/HB? This condition is gr8 (also against shield monks) helping counter armor stacking and offering do quick spikes even on targets with higher armor, again as far as HA/TA/RA is concidered. Can be used as a cover condition.

If I am not mistaken... watch with me (still I am not that good player as you, but maybe another view will help you see other dimensions of PvP):

Let me have my Monk with 81/91 armor and 510hp. Usually monks have 60, right. Difference between non-armor ignoring damage is 0,297 = which eaquals 29,7%. If cracked armor is applied before spike:

Total damage needed to kill target with 60AL. 510 non-armor ignoring damage.

Total damage needed to kill target with 81AL. 661 non-armor ignoring damage.

Difference 151 non-armor ignoring damage. In TA/RA/HB it also takes 5 enegy to heal + 5 energy to remove condition.

Again in TA/RA/HB this condition is extremly powerful when applied in good time. You can say Daze and Blind sux as well since we got RC. I am not talking about removability, but potency:-) What it really does... the effect is awesome.

As you know i dont play GvG and I am not playin HA too often. Just to demontrate the power of the condition as I see it. Let us have a SF spike team attacking warrior with 600 health and without my favorite Sentinel's insignia: Sf deals 106 fire damage @16/ 74 damage against our warrior which is 32 damage reduction. That means approx. after 2 Seafing flames casted, If sacrificed 1 Sf spell and useing Cracked armor instead makes a bit better effect.

2 Searing flames cast @60Al: 212

3 Searing flames cast @80Al: 222

In case we have 4(3 with cracked armor) Searing flame spikers casting on already buring target:

4 Searing flames cast @80Al: 296

3 Searing flames cast @60Al: 318

The difference is not much but it shows very potential of the condition that persists until removed(please dont use argument SF spikes sucks, it is not about SF spike but about potency of Cracked Armor)

Peace out!--Rain4est 12:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

First off, stop refering me as a pro player. I'm not half as good as many people I could point out to you. That being said, (also SF is awwright) cracked armor never sticks. We got Dismiss Conditions (awseome, rly.), we got MbaS, and of course RC. you can bring RC anywhere. RC is great. RC is great. RC is rly rly great. Oh, and if someone is targeted by anything, SF spike, warrior auto attacks, etc. and if the defending team lets CA stick that team deserves to get mown down like blades of grass. mostly, the SF target (if your example) will get RC'ed, healing for 140ish, and losing both burning and CA. NUKLEAR

IIV 15:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

You really didnt get what I was trying to say xd --Rain4est 15:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

no, I did, you said that CA is awesome b/c it has great efficiency. I'm saying that it doesn't last that long to show it. Quite simple, really. NUKLEAR

IIV 15:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hm..

Will said conversation involve pickles?-Warior Kronos 23:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Most probably not. A conversation with cookies will not involve pickles, unless said cookies are the pickles. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 11:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Well said-Warior Kronos

21:49, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] leaving

i herd u r --Cursed Angel 12:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Meh. The drama is lolerific, so I prolly will check here, once a while. But.. yeah. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 23:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Bye NuclearVII. — ク Eloc 貢 01:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

We'll miss you :D Lilondra 16:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Any Chance?

Is there any chance PvE skills are deliberately overpowered to get average and below average players to get at least 10-15 Maxed titles? I reckon amount of people ranting now about imbalanced Ursan are no where near what would be if people were unable to work on their titles before GW2 due to lack of players, after all no one is forced to use PvE skills, just that its Meta =P P.S. Cake is what? Biz 07:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Its mostly Epeening, tbh. People get bigger epeens when they get grind based titles, one of the reasons wow is so popular. It promotes the welfare for players who can't play for shit, but will gladly grind to make worthless shit like titles, again, just like WoW. People would still spam for titles even if they did not transfer to GW2. GW2 is just icing on the cake - you get rewarded in another life if you grind a lot of shit (Religion, much?). Cake is anything but a lie. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 13:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

lol, well said, NuclearVII — ク Eloc 貢 00:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I was on the other side, but for a different reason. Profession discrimination was my issue- when proffessions get excluded from areas solely because their skillsets are completely useless there, something is wrong. Ursan is NOT and ideal fix, as I said many times. It should be nerfed- once they fix the rest of PvE, which they can now do. And I actually do agree with you in the title argument- grind titles are stupid, they should have done something interesting with them. --Kalas Silvern 09:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] A question?

Are we allowing this? I came up with it whilst browsing Izzy's page:

Noxify's post removed. Do not swear or use bad language here.

Do we censor here? If so -

MOTHERFUCKERS. -- NUKLEAR IIV 16:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

No, censoring is not ok, apart from obvious personal attacks I guess. - anja

17:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) We don't censor unless it's an extreme case of a personal attack or includes personal information (see GWW:NPA#Removal of text). While the reason written for removing the comment on Izzy's talk was not the right one, the comment didn't belong on that page. --

Brains12 \ talk 17:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

If we remove that, well, shouldn't we remove half of what shard says? -- NUKLEAR

IIV 17:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

The problem is that no one actually reports that stuff, and it's impossible to keep up with Izzy's pages as an admin (at least I think so) - anja

17:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

So, we censor noxify and let shard slide? Lets have some consistency here...(And no, I mean to say that we should uncensor noxify. censoring shard is a bad idea.)-- NUKLEAR

IIV 21:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

No, we simply do not notice everything. I have no idea where that censoring is, and thus cannot revert it. Feel free to do it yourself, it's not something that requires a sysop. - anja

22:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Balance Ideas

It seems that we have similar ideas in certain areas- namely the problem of balancing around stalling. We should try to think of possible solutions instead of arguing with each other about issues of whether or not classes are inherently gimmicks- and I'm just as guilty of that as anyone. If you think it's a good idea, put a comment on my talk page, and hopefully we can come up with some ideas that could fix this game (even though they'll probably be ignored- but at least we can say we tried). --Kalas Silvern 09:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

while arguing is great, I appreciate your effort in coming to this hallowed talk page. As a result, When I have time, I will write up my take on balance. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 15:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Alright, sounds great. Admittedly, I'm more focused on the expansion classes and turning them into alternates instead of replacements. Ideally something will come of this, and we can find a way to bring diversity back to guild wars... though it's not going to be easy. If you'd like, I'll start thinking of how to improve/fix the expansion classes. The core ones are all yours, I don't have as much experience with those. --Kalas Silvern 06:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Just so you now..

Guild Wars was given a 9.2 on lauch, and still is. So hopefully GW2 will be like that. I think it will be because of the dedication that EotN got. Well, we will see. And yes, you are not the only one thinking of not buying GW2. Oh and link is here Review on gamespot.--Dominator Matrix 00:15, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I know, GW was received popularly when it first came out - but all the expansions were, well, frowned upon. That's cause proph was awesome. Seriously. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 14:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

xD so guild wars went downhill before I joined...ok then. Well it was completely new, no one had seen something like that. The factions/nf/eotn are just well...run-ons in there opinion. Hopefully (but i highly dough it) GW2 will be at least like that at the beginning. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:DominatorMatrix (talk).

I like everything but Prophecies to be honest. It is so empty. I don't want to mindlessly kill mobs of monsters, i want to go on epic quests. Factions started when i reached level 20, prophecies ended. 87.210.150.58 08:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Guild Wars deserved a 9.2 out of 10 points back then, but deserves something closer to a 3 out of 10 now. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:72.71.213.95 (talk).

It's still better than some of the crap that is around, but it did degrade into a 8.0 game. That's pretty sad. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 10:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New Message

I always love new messages. Makes me feel like I'm alienated on the web. Devi Talk 15:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Meh, as long as you don't break the rules of the internet, you won't be alienated. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 15:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Just as a fyi...

This is Ncsoft's stock....(they own arena net) [2]--Dominator Matrix 22:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I know. Would you like a cookie? /shoo. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 13:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

What. The. Hell.

I read the shadow form change.

Then- I read the incoming change.

I have to seriously say:

Its hard to find a single comment of you NuclearVII where you are not completely wrong, grow up kid. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:87.189.189.251 (talk).

Yeah, GL and HF doing that when you just read about the top bit. Also, hai2u, troll no:1. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 16:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ursan Talkpage and Jackasses

God, I think reading that killed my braincells that binge drinking Jack Daniel's didn't get. . . Thanks, it'll make my third year in Iraq less painful. Maybe I'll go find myself a nice sized roadside bomb at put myself out of my misery, lol. --Rururrur 18:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I guess? -- NUKLEAR

IIV 18:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nooks?

^ -- Armond Warblade 17:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

As in? If this is a question about a type, you may GTFO. If not, you may proceed. No fast movements. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 17:19, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Do you has nooks? -- Armond Warblade

17:42, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Who's askin'? -- NUKLEAR

IIV 18:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

No one... important... >.> -- Armond Warblade

18:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

THE UNITED FUCKING NATIONS. Lord of all tyria 19:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... I just pictured a map, with all nations participating in some crazy orgy... "United fucking Nations". Course, only DPRK is not gay. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 19:59, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Does that mean New York City would have to clean up? Wow, I can just picture it now, being filmed on networks, CNN, and everything else, with boring voiceovers totally ruining the atmosphere. This has got to be ranking right up there on the weirdest ideas ever. --Chaiyo Kaldor talk contribs 20:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Yayyay

Arguing with you=fuwn! lets do it agen someday ^O^Oni 14:45, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

NEXT TIME LERN2PLAY, BIACTH! Sure, I'm always here. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 20:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Because name calling is fun...

Don't. NPA and all that stuff aside, even anons have the right to make nonsensical suggestions. If you have something to say, argue against the proposal, not the user who proposed it.--Fighterdoken 06:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

That was idiotic. There points where I just can't waste time explaining myself. As for tolerating bad suggestions - I think those pages a need a little less people who actually know about the game. It's okay to make a suggestion - It's not okay to try to sound like you have experience, when you suggestion is clearly bad. So, too bad. -- NUKLEAR IIV 09:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

If you cant waste time explaining yourself, then how can you waste time insulting the users. He wasn't really trying to sound like he had experience, and yeah, his suggestion sucked, but I've made bad ones myself, as have you. Fighterdoken's point is valid, and you dont have anywhere near the following required to flagrantly break rules ;) --Angelic Loki 09:56, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, yes, he did. By openly posting up on that suggestion page. I would be okay with it if he went up to his talkpage, said, "you know, I think Dshot has this problem...", but instead, he went to the suggestion page, which, I quote: "Low cost and constant 20 second disable time allow overuse by secondary rangers". By stating that as an issue, he assumed his opinion to be fact. This I cannot tolerate. If I said "Iraq war was bad", would you be asking for an explanation? No.

Look, my beef was not with the suggestion. OP was an idiot to openly state his fictitious issue as fact and making a, frankly, moronic suggestion on a page where we expect to take people seriously.

Finally, and I'm going to say this quite nicely, this is none of your business. While I appreciate a friendly warning, or merely a comment, Fighterdoken brought it up, and it is with fighterdoken, - whom, tbh, was also butting in - I'd rather discuss with him. If the OP wants to complain about my supposed breach of NPA, I'd be more than welcome to explain myself. But I don't need, and this is my sweetest voice, anybody else backseating. kthnx. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 10:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

YO NOOKS DOOD U WUZ BAED TROLL. BE LESS FIAL, KTHX. EVEN STOOPDZ CAN HAS OPINIONS. -- Armond Warblade

19:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

O hai thar armond. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 19:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] On that discussion on your userpage

I was thinking, they could make gw2 a democracy on skill balances. --Lann 16:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

That would be a horrible idea, on the premises of 90% of people are idiots. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 18:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

You hit the nail on the head there Nuke. 145.94.74.23 11:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I have a tendency to do that. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 17:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] <3

knew you lurved meOni 22:07, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Unless if you count boredom as love... -- NUKLEAR

IIV 00:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

LurvOni 18:05, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quit trolling the skill discussion

If you keep trolling the skill discussion I will report you for that.

Lolno. -- Armond Warblade

14:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh dear, am I rly a troll? -- NUKLEAR

IIV 16:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

i hurd u trol skil discusion ima report u QQ --Cursed Angel

16:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

U R A DIRTY TROLL >: NAO LURV MEOni 18:05, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

YES I AM DIRTY, NOW CLEANSE ME ONI! -- NUKLEAR

IIV 18:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm using Cure Trolldition on Nukie Lurvs Oni!Oni 18:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC) ANSWEW ON MAH PAEG FOOOni 18:31, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Chill, man

Hey, you're starting to sound like a jilted lover on a soap opera or something about ursan at the moment; you're not looking very good out there. Step away for a day or two. Find a (physical) punching bag, maybe. The debate will still be there when you get back. --Star Weaver 22:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Could you be kind enough to point me where I'm venting too much hot air? Is it the regina's page? That, my little friend, is faaar beyond ursan. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 00:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm with nooks here - he's usually pretty calm when it comes to debates. Fond of capslock at times, but rarely OMGSUPARRAAAAGE. -- Armond Warblade

00:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I has a wiki buddy. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 00:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Agreed, I disagree with Nuklear pretty routinely, but he usually keeps the flaming to a minimum. Calm debates are win- they lead to people compromising :) --Kalas Silvern 03:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Izzy the wizzy

So I suck at comming up with subject lines, but thats another issue altogether... I was informed you responded to me on the little talk/debate we where having on Izzy's page but he was evil and archived a lot of stuff appearantly and since I'm not used the the wiki's I can't find it with the extremely limited time I have at the moment thanks to work. So my apologies on the lack of response and sadly it may take longer still to get one until my work stops with the tug of war. So I will eventually respond, less I forget about it again or get ran over by a reindeer... :p ~ Sabastian 00:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

...okay, I guess? Don't feel too compelled to, though, because it was made of (percent composition by volume) 30% correct, 45% flame flame flame, 20% pent up anger, and only 5% win. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 01:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I make it a point to try and respond to anyone I am having a debate/talk with as it just seems rude to simply ignore them and I try to let people know what is up in said debate should something arise as it usually is the more polite thing to do after all. ~

Sabastian 01:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Judging by your little run-on, I'm assuming you're in a rush IRL. I can wait, I assure you. Just say I hate you, and I'll say I love you, and we'll be done. Saves us both hassle, tbh. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 01:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Seriously, Sebastion, he's right. It'll probably just turn out to be a waste of time on both sides... It's not that rude, and really, people on the internet could care less. :P (That probably won't convince you, but hey, worth a shot.) -- Armond Warblade

03:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] MSN

Has you it? (You can just send me a note if you want, my MSN is on PvX:ADMIN.) -- Armond Warblade 03:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm proud to say that I don't have MSN. Get Skpye. Is so much better. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 11:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

...*sigh* So you want me to run three chat programs at once now? Fine... link me. -- Armond Warblade

14:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

yay. http://www.skype.com/intl/en-gb/welcomeback/ -- NUKLEAR

IIV 15:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Come do hexway. We require monks. -- Armond Warblade 15:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

never. I shall not be soiled, and I iz terrible monk. Yes, even in HA. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 19:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Percent composition 90% win

http://www.cracked.com/video_16271_internet-party-2-intervention-myspace.html watch nao. -- NUKLEAR IIV 22:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] re: Rakryen

Agreed. I realized it after he posted in Frozen Archer's section. I probably won't respond to him ever again. --TimeToGetIntense 15:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Finally started

I finally started my dagger attack balance ideas. As of now, it's a very rough, early version. Leads, Golden series, and Black offhands are "done", providing no one has better ideas/modifications. Here's a link- Dagger Balances. --Kalas Silvern 23:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I can has no moar ban nao?

Well, I congratulate you for banning me right at the right time brains, becuz I won't be able troll anyone for 30+ days.

Yes, I has vacashuns. Good bye y'all! -- NUKLEAR IIV 19:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

WHAT NO -- Armond Warblade

23:26, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Turns out, they gots internet heer. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 12:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Woot! Course, now I get to send in my laptop for two weeks to try to get my internal wireless adapter fixed. Maybe my dad will let me use his new computer of huge monitor. -- Armond Warblade

16:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Congrats :P You win gold and runner up.

NuclearVII scored gold on one of Halogod's Contests.

And

NuclearVII scored runner up on one of Halogod's Contests.

... Now go boast. :P Halogod35

01:23, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Gtfo, I'm the actual winner >':Oni 17:34, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

runner up? Where did you live, again? -- NUKLEAR

IIV 18:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, I expected all four on gold, tbh. -- NUKLEAR

IIV 18:59, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User_talk:NuclearVII"