User talk:Wealedout

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Timewasters Archive 1

Lol @ your page[edit]

correct me if I'm wrong but is your user page referring to or is your rant points toward certain groups of ppl *cough* luxon *cough* lolzz anyway you seem like a cool kid, if you like we can share knowledge, I can show you how to kill Master of Damage in 1 second using Dervish profession. proof --Ridz16 05:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

I can has photoshop? --TalkRiddle 06:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Are you a noob? or are you lacking reading comprehension/commonsense? why would someone offer someone if it cant be done? that would be your homework to answer that question before I answer yours. kkthnxbai --Ridz16 06:59, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I've had 523 damage in 2 to 3 seconds.I'm trying.....--Wealedout 13:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm glad you took it lighthearted. I've played for both sides in JQ and FA, both sides have good players, noobs, leechers and bots but Luxon seems to be more plagued .That damage was done with some PvE skills, no?--Wealedout 16:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Note that his party bar is not there. ¬ «Ðêjh» (talk) 20:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Buff the shit out of 8 Dervs (16 Scythe), then Chilling Victory. --TalkRiddle 05:04, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Dejh and Riddle have a point. I can do 523 damage in 2 seconds, almost 260 each second, which is believable in a D/E bar, but Ridz16 in your picture you don't have the whole screen (I understand why you don't want your player linked to the wiki account) and you haven't give any hints yet.--Wealedout 16:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
I can show you how to kill Master of Damage in 1 second (keep guessing instead of pm'ing me in-game) with the noobs and you might not be able to see how its done LIVE. why should I give hint to these 2 idiots when 1 of them was like "its done in photoshop" I'm not taking them seriously the fact that they talk "arrogantly" I am considering sharing a few knowledge with you because your a fellow derv primary, you wanna take it the wrong way and sit and guess with those 2 idiots then so be it.--Ridz16 23:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Three can keep a secret if two of them are dead. ~Benjamin Franklin --TalkRiddle 06:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Ridz16 don't take it that far. I've only said that they have a point about one thing: the whole screen thing, I think you can prove them wrong. I looked today at your userpage and you have your characters there, so the whole screen thing has some weight, by that I mean; why not show the whole screen if you already have your characters on the wiki? On the hints part, I asked: does it involve PvE skills? Which I believe so, because you are wearing monument armor and wielding a cool looking scythe, I'm still trying to get Asterious scythe which is more difficult because of the Reaper's Sweep update.--Wealedout 14:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Dervs[edit]

Aren't blue. Fix it.

--TalkRiddle 02:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm fixing it....to black, no dervs for PvP, maybe, just maybe for AB.thnxbalancers--Wealedout 03:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Ahh, the melancholy derv. I see. --TalkRiddle 13:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
lolsrsbznss--Wealedout 14:09, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Have[edit]

you ever gone to the official Steam forums? They're fucking terrible. Valve doesn't listen to their userbase anymore than ANet does, they're just better at paying attention to the people who know what the hell they're doing. --75.71.67.5 15:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

I herd they returned sidestabs(figure it out) and give infos on other thins.--ShadowFog 15:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Neither of which relates to Valve listening to their userbase. Sidestabs, aerial stabs, and stairstabs are/were beneficial to game balance, they didn't need to consult anyone to understand that. --75.71.67.5 16:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
lol an IP. next plz.--Wealedout 17:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment on the content, not the contributor. And if it really makes you feel better, I can hop onto one of my dozen-odd socks. --75.71.65.101 18:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
IP tries but fails.Childish beef is none of my concern.--Wealedout 14:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Step 1: Say something ignorant, get called out for it.
Step 2: Try to dismiss everything said.
Step 3: Be required to keep proof of your own incompetence forever.
k. --75.71.65.101 21:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
lol wut?--ShadowFog 00:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Like I said, childish (1,2,3) beef is none of my concern.--Wealedout 23:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, it's your Ma here - you might want to click the link to NPA and read it. Also take note that the matter of whether someone is an IP or a user is irrelevant. --User Brains12 circle sig.png Brains12 \ talk 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Father talking now, I don't give a fuck whatever an IP has to say in my talk page. That "Ma" thing was silly though.--Wealedout 02:44, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Brains r funneh gai, except when he's banning people. Srs bsns. 69.109.175.246 05:08, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

lolsrsbznss[edit]

If you have the time look at the pages. I recommend no writing. And yeah, "No Weapon of Warding for yoo". Later.--ShadowFog 16:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Your "they have no life" thing ,I'm starting to believe. They want to convince others by slinging shit at each other. The henchies are stupider than the head.--Wealedout 17:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Watering down the field[edit]

You know, everytime something weird like that happens in this wiki, we should answer in the same fashion(http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=3018614). Weird.--ShadowFog 13:43, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Not enough contributions to participate in the GWW bureaucrat election.[edit]

Main: 21
You require 100 to participate, check the policy. I'm removing your votes now. ~RyuuUser Ryuu Desu Sig.png[ Talk|Contributions ] 23:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

He has 122 in the talk namespace; that's more than enough. --User Brains12 circle sig.png Brains12 \ talk 23:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Also - GWW:ELECT#Stage 3: Voting. --User Brains12 circle sig.png Brains12 \ talk 23:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) A user must have made more than 100 edits (excluding the User, ArenaNet, and Guild namespaces) before this stage begins. User Talk is still user, no?~RyuuUser Ryuu Desu Sig.png[ Talk|Contributions ] 23:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk: 122
User talk: 78

Oh. >_>;;;~RyuuUser Ryuu Desu Sig.png[ Talk|Contributions ] 23:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

A word of advice[edit]

You may do a better job of convincing people if you didn't write off everyone who disagrees with you as a troll. Calling people a troll is also attacking their personality or personally attacking them as opposed to commenting on their edits, opinions or contributions. I doubt a sysop would act upon it, but just food for thought. Misery 20:16, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I was about to say that myself. I do not like being called a troll just because I disagree with you. Mini Me talk 20:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
See this is where the bandwagon fails. Auron himself has admitted that it is not personal attack calling someone a troll, he himself has admitted to be a troll and he has offended many calling them directly a troll. Besides I did not called anyone directly a troll. So buzz off Mr or Mrs whatever it is future "elected" bcrat.--Wealedout 23:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Unless you are accusing both Misery and Mini of being Auron's sockpuppets, you cannot treat their words as his. -- Armond WarbladeUser Armond sig image.png{{Bacon}} 01:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm not threatening to take you to the AN to try and get you banned for calling everyone a troll, I'm suggesting that you might garner more support if you stopped doing it. At the moment your actions do a better job of making you look ridiculous than they do of convincing anyone. It's advice, you don't have to take it. In fact it's better for me if you don't as everyone will continue to disregard your comments. Misery 06:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

lol Backsword,Mini Me, Misery...wait there are some who haven't posted yet. I thought you guys posted together.--Wealedout 10:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Are you trying to suggest that having people agree with me somehow detracts from my point? That's a rather bizaare stance to take, perhaps you would like to clarify. Misery 15:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Could you please stop with the conspiracy theorizing? It was merely a coincidence, I went to your page without knowing Misery or any one posted here. I do not have contact with any of these persons. Multiple people disagreeing with you does not mean those people are connected in any way whatsoever. Mini Me talk 17:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)