Talk:N/A

We don't have links for other profession abbreviation combos (W/Mo, E/Me, N/Mo, N/Me, etc), so why this one? For the other half of this abbreviation, do we really need something that simplistic? Is there a living english speaking person who doesn't know what "N/A" means? Do we want to become a dictionary for every equally obvious term that can potentially be used such as yo, huh?, wha?, or k? What is going to be our threshold - any word in the english language, any abbreviation no matter how obvious, or some other? Not that it takes up much disk space, so it's not a big deal - but it seems a pointless waste to me. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I believe it was created because it was near the top of Special:Wantedpages. Backsword 15:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

All links are from the user or guild namespaces, nothing from the main article space. To me, it would be better to fix the links to no longer point here (or to de-wikify the links). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

I'd agree, but policy do not allow editing other users' userpages. Backsword 17:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Actually, the policy does allow such maintenance edits. -- ab.er.rant 16:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Should the above discussion be re-visited? Better to fix the links than keep, or is there value in keeping basic definitions? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't think it's really neccessary seeing as it already exists here but if we keep it maybe move it to NA rather than N/A since the wiki thinks its a sub-page of Necromancer with that slash. --Kakarot 23:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Talk page deletion?

While I supported deleting the article, I disagree with deleting the talk page. It provides background on prior delete discussions for if/when the associated article is re-recreated. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok. -- ab.er.rant 15:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)