Talk:N/A
We don't have links for other profession abbreviation combos (W/Mo
, E/Me
, N/Mo
, N/Me
, etc), so why this one? For the other half of this abbreviation, do we really need something that simplistic? Is there a living english speaking person who doesn't know what "N/A" means? Do we want to become a dictionary for every equally obvious term that can potentially be used such as yo
, huh?
, wha?
, or k
? What is going to be our threshold - any word in the english language, any abbreviation no matter how obvious, or some other? Not that it takes up much disk space, so it's not a big deal - but it seems a pointless waste to me. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- I believe it was created because it was near the top of Special:Wantedpages. Backsword 15:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Should the above discussion be re-visited? Better to fix the links than keep, or is there value in keeping basic definitions? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk page deletion?[edit]
While I supported deleting the article, I disagree with deleting the talk page. It provides background on prior delete discussions for if/when the associated article is re-recreated. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)