User talk:195.4.22.21

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

yeah now all this skills are pretty much dead again in pve[edit]

moved from Feedback talk:Game updates/20110322

split pvp and pve seems pretty hard, right anet?195.4.22.21 09:15, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Lol who cares about Pve really? Anet' major issue is pvp. But again congrats to all pvx droids, one avatar nerfed so it is stronger now (fragility) 3 more to go oh and onslaught as well. This mistake means they got plans to make it the worst avatar in the game :D. You guys dont see if u copy thats what you get? If i were anet i would xhit on all pvxers/observers but oh noes anet loves puppies/puppets ( the henchmen-gvg-ha- contest pffft). Clearly you guys QQ for updates and u get twice the worse nerfs in return XD why dont think for yourselves? Is it that hard to get to know a prof and use the skills you like? Or im still in 2005-Guild wars vs Clone wars-? Anyway continue your pvx copy stuff and lets nerf dervs back along with every change they made. Hope anet wont update paras oh and ESPECIALLY smiters or they have to face with more noobs. Smiter's boon was nerfed for a reason cos that showed clearly the way the majority plays. Zero effort Zero skill yet ( who got more back ups hands up!) they could rack up on gladiator title O.o I await trollers after my post :) tell me how much you guys like pvx and i cant come up with a build equal to the ones posted there (LFMAO). --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:~Obs~ (talk).

Actually, there are more people in the community that play PvE than PvP, Arenanet has already admitted about 80% of it's playerbase is PvE, so who cares about PvE? Anet, without PvE they'd be washed up and let's face it, probably out of the job... who cares about PvP... not a bloody lot, really. Oh, sorry that was bitchy. Bad wiki, bad. ~~000.00.00.00~~ 11:56, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I'd imagine revenue-wise, the split is even higher. PvP characters probably don't have much use for costumes, mercenary heroes, etc. -- FreedomBoundUser Freedom Bound Sig.png 12:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Agreed. One slight nerf here, one slight nerf there and we'll eventually be back where we were on the dervish subject. Also, more good discussion about this skill update is on the preview talk page. Idmz 12:50, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Complaining about a dervish skill nerf after their update = fail >_> (Frizz 16:49, 23 March 2011 (UTC))

WTB Para/Ele Skill Overhaul..... What a para represent and what it contributes to a team are vastly different, ok so we have the imbagon...and...well...ummm.....There healing skills are pointless, the DPS support skills are below average, I mean why make a skill that Boost's DPS VS targets with +50% Hp and make it adren based????? WTF? Attack speed boosting skills are terrible, "Have to be under the effects of a shout" or "- 20 armour" How the hell does onslaught get +Attack speed+Movement+Adren and para gets +attack speed -20 armour... wtf if you dont want them in PVP fine, but atleast give them something more fun than an imbagon, for pve..... The joke at the end is a W/P, is a better Than P/ anything.82.5.153.217 14:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

"I R SUPER L33T GW NINJA H4X0R THAT CAN'T FIGURE OUT HOW TO SIGN MY POSTS" --BriarUser Briar Sig 3.jpgThe Spider 14:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Holy crap -Obs-, I had to stop reading after like 12 words because I had a sudden feeling I was entering "Short Bus" territory. Where the hell do these people come from? Can we get some sort of moron filter for wiki? ®emi¢k§ 15:19, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
No, and GWW:NPA applies regardless, so ease up on the insults. --ஸ Kyoshi User Kyoshi sig2.png 15:51, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
@Briar I R LOLS @that. 108.75.73.62 16:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Still waiting for the ranger skills to be sorted out. The elites need sorting out, repetitive skills need looking at (remove one and double the value of the other) and some of the energy/recharge needs looking at - basically, they need to do something to make rangers more attractive for group play. I think that alot of the elite skills for lots of professions need looking at. There are a core number of skills that everyone uses but that is because the other elites are just not worth taking that slot.

Guess u had to stop reading cos u found it familiar. As a veteran Pvp's upredictivity and versatility kept me interested in this game. All i can see now that i can't work on my pvp titles because people just like in RL choose the easiest ways. You need 5 consecs to gain one point at RA (rotfl)and usually that hardly happens cos lack of monks or even too many monks...etc also wiki 12345 spike builds spoil my gaming experience not to mention my progress. Check mesmers, they became eles+necros 2 in one all they can do is casting spells and w8ing NOT interrupting/annoying others. Show me some1 who cannot run three builds namely Vor Psychic insta e-surge+mind wrack. I was so pleased with the dervish update as it adressed a lot of issues pve/pvp wise. Unlike mesmer update u can't dominate over every prof as vor did and as wastrels etc still do. OFC players hungry for quick pvp points/ranks picked the skills which were the strongest and most unambiguous ones. Life stealing, IAS etc were always powerful yet my problem is why do they even care about pvp aspect then? Anet's krewe solved 3-4 pve issues since release and did hell lot of pvp updates- why is that? Anyway i'm back to FA to fight against droids and a hundred times seen builds as thats my only way to get a pvp title (zaishen)for HoM which is a shame. I'm sure no one agrees with me as u rely on a stupid site (PvP) for Pve speedclears are the issue not the monters. HF ll comment on next dervish nerf.

Do you know how to sign your post? You should use four "tilde's" (~) that is the key to the left of your number 1 key on your keyboard k? 108.75.73.62 21:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
To reiterate plz sign your posts PvP vet who does RA and is going back to doing FA. Again that's ~~~~ to sign. --~>Sins WDBUser The Sins We Die By Sig.png 21:18, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.