Category talk:Humans

Category:Social animals → ??? All Animals are Social in one way or another, why not just stick with Category:Animals? — ク Eloc 貢 01:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree, this name is not great. Indeed many animal species are social (like the wolves which i didn't include!), and I'm not sure whether the Norns are really social ...

In fact I simply wanted a category to group all species who had a 'culture', and I didn't know what name to choose as I didn't like 'intelligent species' or 'superior species' either as many animals are intelligent in some way too. Now I called the category 'social species' so that I could include Mursaat and Seers (and Margonites ?) which don't really look like animals. But I still don't like the name.

Maybe I like sorting things and creating pointless categories too much :P--Moriturus 10:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)