Feedback talk:User/Talamare/Tiger Stance
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Decreasing the low end duration and keeping the high end duration the same seems a little harsh for a skill that has a 20 second recharge.Wretched90 23:15, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- agreed with this, 4 seconds just abused by those 4-sec sins. --Tea Cat ._. 10:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- you could make it with the 1...12...15 progression like flail because tiger stance has a long recharge.Wretched90 13:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Dont see big reason why this should be nerfed flurry is used way more than this on sins. Raemon 22:11, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Even if this was nerfed it wouldn't matter much; WC chain would still work with even a 1-second IAS, and Flurry works better for the other chains. Vili 点 22:16, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Dont see big reason why this should be nerfed flurry is used way more than this on sins. Raemon 22:11, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- you could make it with the 1...12...15 progression like flail because tiger stance has a long recharge.Wretched90 13:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)