Feedback talk:User/Vortex ™/Suggestions For Keeping TA

"Linsey said that the TA metagame is stale and consists of degenerate builds. This is simply not true."
Are you playing the same game as everyone else? It's a well known fact that TA is full of BS builds that should never have existed. You can't cite Anet's neglect of this arena being the cause for low player counts, then later say it's balanced. Those are mutually exclusive statements. ~Shard 23:07, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I'm playing the same game as you. A game that's full of BS builds no matter where you look. TA balance is probably on the same level as GvG balance and definately better than in HB or Tombs. And now stop trolling my feedback page please. Vortex ™ 12:29, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

The tombs meta has actually been better (i.e., less blatantly homosexual) than the TA meta for over a year now. HB has always been bad, but TA is really one step above RA in terms of bad arenas with bad metas, and it is definitely nowhere near GvG. -Auron 00:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree with everything you said although I have high hopes for sealed deck. All they have to do is nerf shove spike and TA population will instantly increase 25% much like it did when they nerfed Syncing. But even then its population will still be too small. If you could pay lets say 5$ real life money to start a TA team that is recognized by the game I believe it would explode in popularity. Ncsoft would make money which would pay for the cost of monitoring the TA tournaments that would be held and the cost of the observer mode for it. I would very much enjoy watching 4v4 matches from the games best teams--even more so then 8v8 honestly. Can't we have both sealed deck and a tourny based TA?(Timcago 00:45, 12 September 2009 (UTC)).