Talk:Mragga

It has the same trophy as Phantoms. Has anyone tried testing with a +20% vs demon mod? If they don't get extra damage, and since the devs have already stated that mostly all translucid creatures are either ghosts they are likely to be ghosts, and Mragga too. MithTalk 01:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Mragga existed long before factions, and therefore existed before any enemies were classified as what we know today as demons (oni, grentch, enemies in DoA, etc).76.16.108.117 21:58, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

That is irrelevant for mechanics. If the creature is called a demon in lore, but it drops phantom trophies and the demon mod doesn't affect it, then it's most likely a phantom. Someone with a demon mod should test it. MithTalk 23:58, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

I was, of course, referring to mechanics, not lore. :P I mean.... how can an enemy be affected by a + whatever vs demons if demon mods were not added to the game until later? and I agree, someone should test it 76.16.108.117 02:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

That's the main reason why this is unlikely an actual demon. Whatever it is, it drops the same trophy as the eidolons and the Ice Beast. So it's probably a ghost. Devs have already mentioned that most creatures with that 'greenish' translucent appearance are ghost when they are not spirits. Unfortunately, there is no "of Ghostbusting" mod to specifically test that, but at least it should be the same as the Eidolon, and by elimination that's 'ghost'. MithTalk 06:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Are they fleshy? If they aren't, then they most likely aren't demons. --Silver Edge 07:51, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Tested. It isn't fleshy and I've added it to the page. --Silver Edge 08:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Removed text

"Therefore, spells that destroy spirits will not instantly kill Mragga."

I support the removal of the text above. It's relevant when anti-spirit tactics do work against non-spirits, but it's not notable when they don't. – Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 01:45, 2 April 2012 (UTC)