Template talk:Factions cinematics

I would make it into like 5 sections but then it looks odd with only 2 missions in each box. — Seru Talk 21:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Looks fine. :) —Why 17:29, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Where shall we include the AB cinematics? —Why 19:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

That would be a good idea. — Seru Talk 19:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Why are the row headers (i.e. "the blue bits") so small? The code looks identical to the other cinematic infoboxes, yet these seem to be restricted to a very small width size (even though they all have width=15%). -- Brains12 \ talk 00:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I got no idea brains. I redid all the boxes to 15% so i cant say why. Check out on the project page to compare. — Seru Talk 00:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Fixed it brains. was missing a </span> — Seru Talk 01:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Alliances

Will it make more sense if it was renamed to Factions instead? --MageMontu 19:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, imo. —Why 19:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Competetive Missions

Fort Aspenwood (quest cinematic) is the cinematic that you can play after the luxon quest Fort Aspenwood (quest). The Jade Quarry (cinematics) will be the cinematics that once played at the end of a match in the competetive mission The Jade Quarry, and follows the naming convention of mission-cinematics. Though I do agree we could rename it, as those cinematics have been removed from the mission and can now only be reviewed by talking to certain NPCs in the mission outposts, I don't think "The Jade Quarry (Competetive mission)" would be a good name for that article. That name indicates an article about the actual mission, which is already present at The Jade Quarry. — Why 00:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)