User talk:68.52.164.153

Hi, please stop reverting the content on ArenaNet:Guild Wars 2 suggestions/Text Translation Plugins. If you disagree with someone's revert, continue to discuss on the talk page - keeping up the reverts non-stop doesn't help, as the suggestion pages are supposed to be a community effort. Please take note of Guild Wars Wiki:One-revert rule. Thanks. -- Brains12 \ talk 15:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Please, stop reverting the content on Vial of Dye. That 'original statement' meant that dyes looked different that the name says when mixed or used. The current statement says that the color of dyes may look different on different pieces of equipment, or even don't die at all even if they allow the dye to be applied. "Vial of dies being of a different color than the tootip says" is NOT happening on the game and it's not a bug a red dye is always a red dye, even if it dyes a chaos axe blue. Finally, it' not a note, but the report of a bug, so it must contain all the behavior of the bug, so it can be that long. MithTalk 15:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey faggot

do you want me to have to fist you up the ass with a glove made of broken glass? --Metroid 16:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Dude

Dude, is not require to write what Metroid wrote on the Admin page. Just supply the link or say he wrote NPA stuff on your page, the Admins will know what to do. You know...for future reference and good luck.--ShadowFog 19:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Wither/Malaise

It is possible that the skill 'Shove' was originally intended to be called 'shoulder bash' since the icon looks more like the latter. No, srsly that anomaly you listed does not belong on the wiki. We do not document possibilities. If you seek confirmation from an Anet staff member (and they confirm) then that information could potentially stay, but I'm reverting for now.--118.90.21.132 07:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, possibilities are listed all over the place, mostly in the trivia or anomaly sections. I agree with its removal in this case, however; if anet confirms that bit of trivia, okay, but for now, it's too trivial (c wut i did thar) to be listed without proof. -Auron 07:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

One thing is something like "Drakes on the plains" that is quite obvious. But that was WAAAAY too much obscure. Unless you have something like gw.dat data, you can't add that kind of 'maybe'. MithTalk 13:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC)