User talk:Nalana Darkling/Piplup

Awesome. I jizzed in my pants when I saw that. personn5 02:25, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Dude, i know! Check out the edit page for even MORE JIZZZZ ПALANA 14:50, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Holy...Sweet...Taco...Monkey...Sharky....Cheese..Woah o.o--Neil2250Please buff me 16:17, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Copyvio

Aint it?–alistic 02:26, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Por que? ПALANA 21:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it is. The same image has been used and deleted many times before. -- pling 22:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

But a) it isn't an image and b) why is it bad? i dont particularly give a fuck, im just wondering. delete it if the wikigods demand it ПALANA 01:12, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

I really don't understand how a copyvio could apply to a string of html text any more than it applies to using my signature on your userpage's friend list, for example. They're both written using the same medium, and the piplup "image" is simply a longer string of code. I'm happy to be enlightened. ПALANA 01:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

That string of html text depicts Piplup, and he's copyrighted by some organisation or other which means it can't be used on the wiki. -- pling 01:21, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

An image is an image; it doesn't have to be an image file. A string of html made to replicate the image of a piplup is still an image of a piplup, even if it is not specifically uploaded as a jpg. -Auron 01:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

So it has nothing to do with anything except the fact that it's showing a representation of a pokemon, which is branded? that's simple enough, delete away. i shall miss it, though. ПALANA 01:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC)