ArenaNet talk:Skill feedback/Ranger/Scavenger's Focus

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Info-Logo.png Note: As of September 2, 2009 this page is no longer active. If you have suggestions for Guild Wars skills please go to Feedback:Main to learn how to submit suggestions that ArenaNet can use.
Icon merge.png Warning: This page has been merged into ArenaNet talk:Skill feedback/Ranger/resolved Wilderness Survival and may have unresolved attribution issues. Do not tag it for deletion until all attribution issues have been resolved.


This skill wouldn't be worth a skill slot even without being elite. It is now just something like a bad joke from the designers i think... -.- My suggestion to make this to an elite skill is: "Elite Preparation. For 24 seconds, your attacks deal +4...12...14 damage and your arrows cannot be blocked from foes suffering from a Condition."

This is how an balanced elite has to be. The really good effect is conditional, while the little bonus damage isn't. It's just a bit higher than "read the wind" ones, without acceleration of your arrows and in the original version this damage is even conditional! o.O Who designed this skill, btw?. A. von Rin 22:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Above suggesttion is awesome. Nukleaer VII File:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 18:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I dont think the skill is designed to be used with a ranger. Have you considered using it with an Assassin? Easy application of conditions, and +damage on the spike can be particularly deadly. I do agree, however, that it is underpowered as far as preps go, but its ability to be used on any weapon is an important point. --Angelic Loki 02:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I didn't buff it much for other professions than Rangers (some dmg for an elite is not imba), so it should be ok overall. A. von Rin 15:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Small health steal (sounds right with scavenger) as well?

I've always advocated for it to steal health instead of bonus dmg if the target is suffering from a condition. User: Ema

Since the last update should this be moved to the dealt with section?

Yep. 66.75.136.251 00:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)