ArenaNet talk:Skill feedback/Warrior/"You're All Alone!"
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Note: As of September 2, 2009 this page is no longer active. If you have suggestions for Guild Wars skills please go to Feedback:Main to learn how to submit suggestions that ArenaNet can use. |
Mending Touch says hi. 76.89.94.179 22:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- It depends on the context. In some circumstances using this skill can actually kill you. But i am sure that the absence of context was not intended, was it ? Yseron - 90.15.49.175 22:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- No Attribute is bad for the game
- Yes, but only if being in an attribute would make a difference. Why do people hate good skills? If anything, increase the conditional range. Putting this into tactice will only kill it. ~Shard 22:51, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- No attribute is still bad for the game. In fact I would go as far as to say that every significant effect should scale with attributes. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:96.233.11.131 (talk).
- → moved from ArenaNet:Skill feedback/Warrior/"You're All Alone!"
- Mending Touch, or stay near an ally, IMHO. --62.158.103.249 19:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- The only problem with this is probably the "YAA!" Sin. Also, it's all well and good to say "Mending Touch" or "Stay near an ally" but how is a N/E or a W/Rt going to get that on their bar exactly? And staying near an ally is easy in HA but not necessarily in AB or HB. Personally, I quite like this skill, but I can see where people are coming from when they want to regulate it. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:82.3.255.222 (talk).
- Mending Touch, or stay near an ally, IMHO. --62.158.103.249 19:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Check last monthy HB tournment, lol the easiest snare elite for sins in 4-player team pvp. Well, it's bad when some elite used more by other class instead of warriors. because it's a gay no attribute, 5Energy10CD shout. Make it base on tactics will be better. --140.128.67.248 06:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)