Feedback talk:User/Painted Bird/Non-Class-Specific Appearance Options

If you give all professions what everyone else has, then there really isn't any originality or individuality towards that profession. And Yes, I know where you're coming from because i plan to make a necromancer, but i don't want an ugly ass demon, skull, dread face on my character, but i perfer to have a pet, like a ranger. And the pets are the equivalent of the necro's face paint, or the thieves' facial blankie, so really, if this option DOES happen, either 1: rangers will give up their pet for some meaningless look, or 2: rangers get a pet AND a meaningless look. Then goes on the endless cycle of jealous and envy of "i want that too". And pet's are invovled in many things for rangers such as traits skills, and the elite, Rampage as one. and because of the pet's vast participation in the Ranger class, rangers will come to the conclusion that you HAVE to take the pet instead of the addition looks because they're so goddamn beneficial.

If Anet realy were to put this type of customization, I'd perfer it to be an end-game-vanity thing were once you've beaten the stroyline or whatever, you can dress yourselves up to whatever willy-nilly you want.

And about the boob thing. I'd say to just keep the boobs at "non-customizable" because boys, not men, but boys (yes there IS a diifference) will infact be boys and make themselves with gigantic triple G cups w/e. Or boys will claim they're girls and say that "they really look like this" then further on dye their armor pink because they think they're bad ass. So all in all, keep the boobs like they were in gw1, assassins have tiny breasts because they needa be small and agile, and can't have anything in their way. stuff like that.--Eclipse143 22:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)