Feedback talk:User/Ragnearoa/Golem Appearance

Multiple Types

Just wait. This could be their class, and have multiple types--Knighthonor 11:04, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

May i just add that that picture was consept art and the real thing was in the Trailer? --Neil2250 , Render Lord 11:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

The GW2 ones do look a bit clunkier. All I really care is that they act and look like golems, not robots.--Will Greyhawk 18:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

I actually prefer the newer designs. :) The old ones look rather clunky and disfunctional, whereas the newer ones are slender, more streamline, have a firmer and stronger build to them, and overall appear more "efficient", which really does say something about the Asura. --GreatWallStr 14:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

(just to clarify, by "slender" I mean they do not have all the bumps and ridges, but a smooth metallic surface)--GreatWallStr 14:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps the clunkier golem you see in GW2 trailers have different traits, like this one has more defense, and if they bring back the GW golem design, the GW design could be more of an attack based golem.

Comment from a player: The ones you see in EOTN are made by oola or blimm i think so yea they would change over time, not all golmancers can make as good golums as the epic golmancers so yea stuff changed models changed people changed its 250 years