File talk:Gold trim.jpg
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
tyvm, something terrible went on.--'ÑöẊĭƑý 03:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
In before revert war... (ec) too late[edit]
The second image "looks" better (at least more bright) and is fully oriented toward the cammera instead of sideways. It would still be better to find another example where the central logo is not the same color as the trim, as to differentiate it.--Fighterdoken 03:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- The second image isnt of somebody that paid for a leech spot. Not to mention it looks a lot better. DrogoBoffin 03:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) The fact that the cape was bought, hacked, begged, stolen, etc is irrelevant here. What matter is the best image quality to represent the "trim". If you or anyone can provide a better one, upload then, not just revert because you don't agree with the way the trim was attained.--Fighterdoken 03:22, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- I did. Rawr's cape is also more symbolic than random nobodies, not to mention the image was cropped better and had more neutral lighting (i.e., not overly bright). -Auron 03:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- My only revert was because Nox reverted it back to a cape with an incorrect name. DrogoBoffin 03:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- The second image has a better picture, better angle, and better look then the one you uploaded. If you want I'll zone wherever you want and take a new pic right now. Thanks <3--'ÑöẊĭƑý 03:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Auron that it should be a Rawr cape. They have earned it more then anybody else. DrogoBoffin 03:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- @Auron, symbolism means nothing really for this. And no, the first image is in no way better than the second, unless i have gotten blind somehow. Isn't there a render or another image in the GW site that can be used instead as to not boost anyone's ego?--Fighterdoken 03:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Auron that it should be a Rawr cape. They have earned it more then anybody else. DrogoBoffin 03:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- The second image has a better picture, better angle, and better look then the one you uploaded. If you want I'll zone wherever you want and take a new pic right now. Thanks <3--'ÑöẊĭƑý 03:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) The fact that the cape was bought, hacked, begged, stolen, etc is irrelevant here. What matter is the best image quality to represent the "trim". If you or anyone can provide a better one, upload then, not just revert because you don't agree with the way the trim was attained.--Fighterdoken 03:22, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Both options sound good. In photoshop we trust :) (addded) Actually, the one on the trim page has the same problem as the first one here (sideways), so i would go for Wyn's alternative.--Fighterdoken 03:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Give me a few to get it right. -- Wyn talk 04:16, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Here's one, I could do each of the cape shapes as a gallery File:Gold trim cape example.png. Up to you guys. -- Wyn talk 05:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I created examples of each shape. Gold trim cape examples -- Wyn talk 10:47, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- I like the way the article looks now with that trim example page.--Fighterdoken 21:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I created examples of each shape. Gold trim cape examples -- Wyn talk 10:47, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Here's one, I could do each of the cape shapes as a gallery File:Gold trim cape example.png. Up to you guys. -- Wyn talk 05:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Give me a few to get it right. -- Wyn talk 04:16, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Both options sound good. In photoshop we trust :) (addded) Actually, the one on the trim page has the same problem as the first one here (sideways), so i would go for Wyn's alternative.--Fighterdoken 03:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)