File talk:Gold trim.jpg

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

tyvm, something terrible went on.--'ÑöĭƑýtalk 03:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

In before revert war... (ec) too late[edit]

The second image "looks" better (at least more bright) and is fully oriented toward the cammera instead of sideways. It would still be better to find another example where the central logo is not the same color as the trim, as to differentiate it.--Fighterdoken 03:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

The second image isnt of somebody that paid for a leech spot. Not to mention it looks a lot better. User DrogoBoffin sig icon.png DrogoBoffin 03:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
I uploaded a new page, the picture I took was much better. We really don't need to advertise DF's cape...--'ÑöĭƑýtalk 03:22, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
No, your image isn't cropped and is too bright. Also, that's obviously not DF's cape. -Auron 03:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) The fact that the cape was bought, hacked, begged, stolen, etc is irrelevant here. What matter is the best image quality to represent the "trim". If you or anyone can provide a better one, upload then, not just revert because you don't agree with the way the trim was attained.--Fighterdoken 03:22, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
I did. Rawr's cape is also more symbolic than random nobodies, not to mention the image was cropped better and had more neutral lighting (i.e., not overly bright). -Auron 03:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
My only revert was because Nox reverted it back to a cape with an incorrect name. User DrogoBoffin sig icon.png DrogoBoffin 03:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
The second image has a better picture, better angle, and better look then the one you uploaded. If you want I'll zone wherever you want and take a new pic right now. Thanks <3--'ÑöĭƑýtalk 03:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree with Auron that it should be a Rawr cape. They have earned it more then anybody else. User DrogoBoffin sig icon.png DrogoBoffin 03:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
@Auron, symbolism means nothing really for this. And no, the first image is in no way better than the second, unless i have gotten blind somehow. Isn't there a render or another image in the GW site that can be used instead as to not boost anyone's ego?--Fighterdoken 03:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
How about I photoshop an example of a gold trimmed cape using the dat extracted images so it isn't representing any particular guild? -- Wyn User Wynthyst sig icon2.png talk 03:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Why dont we just put the same image thats on the trim page. The gold ones anyway. User DrogoBoffin sig icon.png DrogoBoffin 03:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Both options sound good. In photoshop we trust :) (addded) Actually, the one on the trim page has the same problem as the first one here (sideways), so i would go for Wyn's alternative.--Fighterdoken 03:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Give me a few to get it right. -- Wyn User Wynthyst sig icon2.png talk 04:16, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Here's one, I could do each of the cape shapes as a gallery File:Gold trim cape example.png. Up to you guys. -- Wyn User Wynthyst sig icon2.png talk 05:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I created examples of each shape. Gold trim cape examples -- Wyn User Wynthyst sig icon2.png talk 10:47, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
I like the way the article looks now with that trim example page.--Fighterdoken 21:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)