Guild talk:Through The Eyes Of The Dragon

Stay off of our page, Vince, you delusional pice of crap.

Somebody sounds mad. Vincent Evan [Air Henchman] 16:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Someone wanna tell me wth is going on?

Until then, quit reverting the page. — Raine Valen 15:36, 5 Jan 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, one moment, I'll explain it. Vincent Evan [Air Henchman] 19:20, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Alright, now that my photos are uploaded, I first edited this guild page on the fact that the guild is currently dead/inactive/etc whatever you wish to call it. I did a tad bit much in the first place, and Greener corrected my mistakes I made. He did not understand that I was in this guild and I knew about it. I knew it died, and this guild for some reason, used the wiki as a site for communication, I made it as a wikipage about the guild itself, not as a guildsite. The wiki page had old information about old tournaments, contests, and alliance rules it had and I simply edited it out. The guild itself is in fact dead, here are some screenshots to show you, Guild List, Guild History and Announcements andAlliance Tab. I based my editing off what these screenshots show you. I fail to see how I acted in the wrong manner, but from these IPs, who obviously have something against me, aren't understanding what I am doing. I put the history tag on there because I have seen the edits IPs have been doing, I believe they are trying to make minor edits (see history) to keep it so it does not even get the history tag. Besides a few exceptional changes, the edits made are ancillary and probably some form of advertisement thinking that people actually look at this page in the first place. So, all in all, I don't know what's up with the vandalism being made and it seems foolish to me. Vincent Evan [Air Henchman] 19:36, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Conversation referred to above is at User talk:Greener#Your Revert. Vincent's first edit was "too far" in my mind, and he since corrected it to a level that I considered okay, allowing him to revert over me, with the assumption that the guild was truly inactive. G R E E N E R 20:28, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

The guild list seems to show it's fairly active, or at least not inactive. pling 20:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand the desire to continually edit the page one way or the other. If the guild is inactive it will be marked as such after a period of 3 months of it not being edited. The argument between yourself and the IP seems to suggest that at he very least someone is still active within the guild. Further to that the guild webpage has been edited in november. Therefore based on this reasoning I would like to ask Vincent to stop trying to label the guild as inactive. If it is inactive, we will label it in due course. If the page however continues to be edited and utilised, then we will have to assume it has not become inactive. In the wider scheme of things this is really isn't worth a revert war. -- Salome 20:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC)