Talk:Borrowed Energy

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

i'd really like this, 5 sec recharge would let u drain a monk completly tho, and urself by costing 25 energy each 5 sec if the enchantment end when u cast it again :/ . but theres lots of inspiration skills to help like ether signet, signet of recall and maybe ether lord, pretty good concept to make energy draining possible but trashed :/ --Cursed Angel talk 21:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Luckily this skill is removed. OPed with other inspiration draining skills. 15 energy doesn't make this skill balanced; due to energy management such as GoLE and even AI(auspicious incantation).152.226.6.203 04:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)L
Anyway, I never got why unreleased/removed skills get concise descriptions. Are they done by bots or what?152.226.6.203 04:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Well all skill description information is loaded directly from the gw.dat file. So if ANet change something in an update, it'll be on the wiki, including concise descriptions. That's why some skills on the wiki don't have any descriptions, although we probably know what they do anyway. Paddymew 18:57, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

If this enchantment doesn't count as ending every time it's reapplied, I think it's safe to say why it never made it. Energy vacuum! alice&sven

Wait...The higher your rank in Inspiration, the MORE energy you lose when it ended?[edit]

Silly Anet. 71.194.87.164 20:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Silly Anet. --NeilUser Neil2250 sig icon6.png 20:03, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Uhm...duh? You're borrowing the energy. Not stealing it. Cheapy 07:14, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
@Neil: LMAO. GD ANet was so retarded when they did that. How about making the DF bonus scale with DF, at least for the PVP version? And not even that much- +5..15..20% more, and keep the 5e/10s recharge with w/e length seems reasonable. It would be a 61.44 heal at 16 DF, which would provide a meager 10-11 extra health per DF trigger (IDK rounding rules) with 16 DF. Actually, maybe it should be a little stronger than that, but still, it would be worth more than it is now. FTLForTheLulz 13:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)