Talk:Fish (passive)

in gw2 we will have fishing rods too --The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.140.6.120 (talk).

Delete?

Is this article needed? These fish don't have a role other than scenery. -- Brains12 \ Talk 19:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Unless we want to have a "scenery project", no. I'm against that, and it would all be done through the .Dat anyways. So delete. Calor 19:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Why delete it? Its not much of an issue, imo this is something worth mentioning. --Shadowphoenix 19:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

If you delete this, then you also need to delete the articles on dogs, cats and chickens. I'm all for deletion of these articles. Completeness is one thing, but documenting every piece of scenery is a bit much.--Pyron Sy 19:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

There is no Dog or Chicken article? Calor 19:34, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) They don't have a purpose; they don't do anything; they only exist as scenery. If you mention this, you may as well mention the mountains, or the rivers, or the trees. I don't think it's something we need. -- Brains12 \ Talk 19:34, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Then delete, the Cow, Cat, and Dog articles as well..... --Shadowphoenix 05:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The Cows are involved in a quest, so they stay. Calor 18:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

I just edited the page to clean up the sloppy photo positioning, but I don't see the point in this page. Like brains said, this is like documenting every piece of scenery. I'm all for deleting it. -Warior Kronos 01:26, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

As there aren't even any links to this page, and searching for 'fish' brings you to a compendium of enemies with fish as species, this page isn't even easily accessible. So either a project needs to be started up to document all fish, trees, rocks etc., or the page gets deleted. I'd say delete. :) --Arduinna 13:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)