Talk:Forgotten Avenger

Forgotten?

I'm confused. Should the Forgotten Avenger and Forgotten Champion be listed in the Forgotten category even though they are Enchanted Constructs and only affiliated with the Forgotten? Slagleg 15:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't think so, but that's just me. - HeWhoIsPale 15:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Anomaly?

→ moved from Talk:Forgotten Champion#Anomaly? (Technically, a duplicate question was removed from that location, but we don't have a {{duplicate topic}}.)

Shouldn't being fleshy be an anomaly, since the other forgotten (besides Forgotten Champion) aren't? Leave the Weak 05:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

You mean should we label it using {{anomaly}}? There are only 5 foes in Category:Enchanted armors and listed on Enchanted armor. Of those, the consistent pattern is those named Enchanted [item] are non-fleshy; the two called Forgotten [noun] are fleshy.

So, it's eye-of-the-beholder whether that's anomalous or an obvious design choice. For borderline issues like this, I ask how much it matters to the average reader: are they better off seeing an anomalous tag? Personally, I think it's sufficient we noted the difference; I think we should reserve use of the template for situations that are less obvious. OTOH, I wouldn't revert it if someone felt strongly enough to make it an anomaly. – Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 08:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)