Talk:Necromancer Dunbari

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

trivia[edit]

Link or it did not happen... I see nothing in google related to this trivia... 65.6.156.101 09:07, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

go look at the ladder Dunbari is top 50!--User Azum Grentch Cap.pngAzum 09:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
since there is no google result for that "Dunbari ladder" could you instead provide the link that backs your claim, since I already stated my stance that google can find no reference to your "common" claim 65.6.156.101 09:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
I am just trying to help the wiki and add good trivia and this NPC was named after Dunbari Facestomper top 50 poop trim super terminator warriors[HELL] look it up on the ladder or ask Starctaft Forever! I am Hemo Ftl and i know this shit--User Azum Grentch Cap.pngAzum 09:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
For such a claim first you'd want to give us a link.. .second you'd need to tell us that this guy was around in starcraft before Nightfall... then you'd need a member og Guildwars team to confirm the relation... otherwise you're making relations two two things in your mind... much like hillbilly cousins making relations... 65.6.156.101 12:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Hemo Ftl is all the proof you need--User Azum Grentch Cap.pngAzum 12:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
who is that? -Auron 12:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
TOP 50 player, whoru?--User Azum Grentch Cap.pngAzum 12:50, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Someone who doesn't play a dead game full of bad players and definitely not someone who thinks ladder rank means a damn thing. Go win a gold and come back.
Either way, this trivia is utter bullshit. Ask Emily, I'll wait for her response. -Auron 12:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
You haven't earned a single trim yet you call other people bad, i'm not the one who needs proof, you are!--User Azum Grentch Cap.pngAzum 12:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

(Reset indent) While committing yourself to waiting TEN years to try again, I don't think we need to revisit this. Trivia is not only far-fetched but also wrong, with no proof provided of the contrary. Removing this in the nearby future unless an actual source is provided. - Infinite - talk 23:55, 27 November 2020 (UTC)