Talk:Warrior Primeval armor
Boots[edit]
Its nice, but i hate the boots on the male version. I didn't really pay attention to it until i bought the set... now i regret getting the boots. Female version looks better for sure.--PimpC1125 00:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- No. Actually, the boots look perfect in my opinion. You can even make very nice combos with them. Markus Clouser
12:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed. First use your right boot to knock the enemy down, then use the left one 4 times in a row to deal total of 800 dmg. Then use a combo of left-right-left to kick the enemy in the nuts and get a KO.
- Yes, Ive seen many use the boots only.85.200.17.103 08:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Gauntlets[edit]
Okay, does anyone else notice that the arm on the left of the male set looks WAY too small? I dont mean to be sexist or anything, but on all the other armors the male arms are bigger than the female arms.--72.223.77.197 00:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- It does...It's like atrophic or something. I really like the male boots though. I'm going to get them when I get my warrior this far. xP 72.81.247.139 02:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- I think this looks like a very nice armor set, but im not a big fan of the helmet, but i guess i could just dye the armor a dark purple (like the tormented weapons "glowing patterns")and put on a blindfold. this is probably the best looking primeval armor, followed by the mesmer. Valion Sentis 00:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- The 'atrophic' effect of the arm might be because that's the dominant arm and would hold a sword or axe. The smaller armor means less metal and less weight allowing for the person to swing their weapon harder. If you look at any video game, and some photos of historical armor, the dominant hand or arm has less 'protection' because of the fact that, that's the arm the weapon goes in. Anyway my two sense is that I don't like the warrior primeval, but that's just me... Arty 23:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- the left arm simply has no extra armor. It's just the bicep covered with black. Look at your warrior from the same angle.Atomisk 15:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- First of all, @Atomisk, it is the Right arm that has no extra armor, not the left :P. Secondly, wouldn't it make more sense to have armor guarding the dominant arm? Think about it... you have only a sword (or axe ._.) to protect that arm, so any smart foe would swipe at it and render the warrior useless, due to severe muscle damage in the dominant arm. IMO a warrior should have more armor on his dominant arm and less on the arm carrying the shield, cause the shield will be defending that arm anyway. Elite Gladiator.
Kaoz|talk 12:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- While I think the "lack of armor for the deftness of the arm" idea is pretty much what they were going for, I think it definitely does look too thin; compare it with Elite Gladiator, and the arm is definitely a lot thinner. 74.229.178.150 00:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- First of all, @Atomisk, it is the Right arm that has no extra armor, not the left :P. Secondly, wouldn't it make more sense to have armor guarding the dominant arm? Think about it... you have only a sword (or axe ._.) to protect that arm, so any smart foe would swipe at it and render the warrior useless, due to severe muscle damage in the dominant arm. IMO a warrior should have more armor on his dominant arm and less on the arm carrying the shield, cause the shield will be defending that arm anyway. Elite Gladiator.
- the left arm simply has no extra armor. It's just the bicep covered with black. Look at your warrior from the same angle.Atomisk 15:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- The 'atrophic' effect of the arm might be because that's the dominant arm and would hold a sword or axe. The smaller armor means less metal and less weight allowing for the person to swing their weapon harder. If you look at any video game, and some photos of historical armor, the dominant hand or arm has less 'protection' because of the fact that, that's the arm the weapon goes in. Anyway my two sense is that I don't like the warrior primeval, but that's just me... Arty 23:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think this looks like a very nice armor set, but im not a big fan of the helmet, but i guess i could just dye the armor a dark purple (like the tormented weapons "glowing patterns")and put on a blindfold. this is probably the best looking primeval armor, followed by the mesmer. Valion Sentis 00:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
this set is the best of the game its looks fckn great78.176.160.40 06:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately almost every single Warrior thinks that, this armor has become way too common. -77.166.63.187 08:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- I know I am late for the party, but To Kaoz, In most armed fighting stances with shields any non-attack stance would have the shield at the ready to block an attack to the wielding arm, since like Atomisk said most armors Left the wielding arm bare to allow movement, this is most noted by the Samurai and female Gaisha of Japan, though the female gaisha to fight off certain, unwanted, customers would entirely remove the upper portions of their clothing or bare one arm to fight with.Ampkingomega 01:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
The helmet[edit]
Oh noes, Shiro uses ' Mail Delivery!' You're blinded for 20 seconds >_>. Really anet, learn2design a visor 84.27.10.233 20:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Suicide Note[edit]
Just Expert Salvaged my Primeval Cuirass by accident and got 102 bones. So.... goodbye world :P Is there any way I can get it back by emailing someone? As it was an honest mistake :'( Chibot2000 11:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Nope, ArenaNet can't do that, otherwise they'd have to roll back the servers for everyone. :P So I guess you need to craft it again. Good luck. --J0ttem™ 06:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
sonics the name[edit]
speeds my game--Hubbard 
The Dervish 03:08, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- 'bout time someone else saw it! I dyed mine blue/silver years ago when I first got it. Still wearing it to this day.~ Gold Dean - 22:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
