Template talk:Policy

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Any objection to a "Shortcuts" box, like used at Wikipedia (and which inspired GuildWiki's use of the same)? I find giving someone a link to a policy via a shortcut to be MUCH more convenient.
If agreed ... what should we use for the standard leading letters for the shortcut? GW? GWW? GWOW? --Barek 20:27, 7 February 2007 (PST)

/agree. I guess GWW, not my favorite but better than GWOW. --Rainith 20:30, 7 February 2007 (PST)
/agree as well. I like GWW. — Jyro X 20:31, 7 February 2007 (PST)
/agree. GWW. Go ahead and implement. —Tanaric 20:32, 7 February 2007 (PST)

Shortcuts revisited[edit]

I noticed on GWW:NPA that the shortcuts are no longer showing. If that was done intentionally, can someone point me to the discussion? If accidental, I'll do a partial revert of some of the changes here. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 00:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

I believe that it has been fixed by restoring {{Shortcut}} back to its originally designed use - then creating {{Shortcuts}} for the alternate use later created for it at Guild Wars Wiki:Formatting/Redirects. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 00:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Inactive policy proposal vs. inactive policy draft[edit]

I would prefer inactive policy draft. -- Gordon Ecker 02:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

why? In general a draft is a proposal as well and I think most inactive policies are proposals, not drafts.. poke | talk 09:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)