User talk:Edru viransu

ohai blue talk page. —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Skakid9090. 01:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

red link, lol@Edru. Readem Promote My Ban Here 01:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

hai2u, skakid and readem. u r mean 4 mking my rd link blue. :p --Edru viransu 02:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Get WH or another MMO?

And who's to say you won't just complain about those games either? Vanguard 03:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Because WoW is fun, Fury actually pays attention to their playerbase, and Pirates of the Burning Sea and Warhammer haven't fucked up yet. --Edru viransu 03:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

They haven't because, as far as I know, they aren't even out yet. (As a side note I do enjoy WoW a lot more, but I just stopped being able to afford it. Very sad.) Vanguard 03:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I'd rather give Warhammer or PotBS a chance than play a game that I know is bad and that I know is horribly mishandled by its devs. --Edru viransu 04:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

So untill then you'd rather just attack every angle of GW you can? Why don't you just go play WoW >_> Vanguard 04:03, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Because I don't feel like spending every moment of my time on it? I keep coming to forums and wikis because I have time to kill and I hope that I might be able to help make GW or GW2 just a little less bad. --Edru viransu 04:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Hah, It's a neat vision but you of all people should know by now that the Devs don't give a shit what we think. Vanguard 04:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I know, but I have time to kill and nothing better to do, so I might as well try. --Edru viransu 04:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

It would just be nice if you could try with some tact. I have a lack of tact in real life which gets me in a lot of shit. So I'm just sayin'. Tis all. Vanguard 04:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I feel that I am being as tactful as is possible without detracting from my point. --Edru viransu 04:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I feel there is a better way to go about it than having a huge band of trolls just smash on the devs with a "Your game and your game updates suck, do better" mantra. Surely you all can do better. Perhaps I'm just too casual to complain. I'll discuss more tomorrow. My body needs sleep. Ugh. Vanguard 04:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

The thing is, anything more would just be redundant. Even when people who understand the game far better than Izzy does(i.e. Ensign) explain precisely what the game needs to be fixed, they can't get it right. The problems with the game have been discussed endlessly, and they aren't being dealt with. I still discuss them, but I also now acknowledge that GW is bad and has pretty much no hope of not being bad in the future. --Edru viransu 04:33, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

If there's no hope of it being not bad, I still don't get why you bother wasting your own time, time that could be spent on those games you praise. Vanguard 15:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Again, I don't want to spend all my time on those games, and I have free time that I don't want to play WoW during. I have a lot of free time, so wasting some of it is quite essential, imo. --Edru viransu 18:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough, I'll just have to live with your tactless attacks. Especially since I am the same way when it comes to a topic that ruffles my own feathers. Fellow flamer /highfive Vanguard 18:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

/highfive, although I still think that I am as tactful as I can be without diluting the meaning of my statements(although, tbh, outside of a wiki, I wouldn't be nearly as tactful(I won't say precisely what I'd say, since I don't feel like getting banned for NPA right now, though)). --Edru viransu 19:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Then please learn the difference between a question and criticism. You criticize me for criticizing Radeam, while I was just asking why he was still playing GW in the first place. And this is a request, not criticism. Nicky Silverstar 21:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I have not taken issue with your asking him why he still plays(although his talk page is the place to ask, not his userpage). I take issue with your insulting his intelligence and communication skills. --Edru viransu 23:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Which I also never did, you just misread what I write. I also like to mention that bashing people and calling them names is not something that most people associate with intelligence.Nicky Silverstar 07:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

tis dark

Here is what every person who plays GW should do:

• /uninstall
  • Get WoW or Fury
    • Play WoW or Fury
  • When Pirates of the Burning Sea comes out, consider getting it.
  • When Warhammer comes out, consider getting it.

Dont forget runescape!-dark btw sod is reforming.

Runescape is baed. Also, who cares about GW guilds? --Edru viransu 22:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Posting

Please keep election comments on the talk page. I will move your there. You can vote again if you wish. Backsword 02:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Edru viransu/Sig

The above page has been marked for deletion as it violates GWW:SIGN#Page_transclusion. — ク Eloc 貢 02:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

It's not transcluded. It's substed. --{{delete|Violation of [[GWW:SIGN#Page_transclusion]]}}

— Edru/QQ 04:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

If it was transcluded, that would no longer have the delete tag. I'd better nowiki that, actually. — Edru/QQ 04:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, misunderstood the policy. I'll fix. --— Edru/QQ 05:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

There, I think it complies with policy now. Even did the whole User:Edru sock thing. =] — Edru/QQ 05:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

There, no longer transcluded. The main reason I had that page anyway was so I could look back and see sigs I had previously used. I'd rather it not be deleted. I actually had initially thought that substing would subst it into the sig, not everytime I used my sig, lol. — Edru/QQ 05:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

btw m8 wuts trolin? — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 05:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)