User talk:Kaisha/Sandbox

Total costs

There are two total costs that interest people:

1. Five-piece costs (for those buying everything)
2. Four-piece costs (for those who want to pay the minimum for HoM...or who have a set of common headgear).

There's going to be controversy as to which total to include in the table...mebbe you can find a compromise that allows room for both. — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 17:44, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

True. I have been thinking on that, but far as I'm doing right now, is what has always been done on most of the armor pages, just making it consistent with the rest. Which is giving the total cost of everything. All I know is for those that want just the armor without the headpiece, could just subtract the amount for the headpiece. I might do up a special page for those who want to pay the minimum for HoM , etc. and have it as an external link at the bottom. thoughts? 72.148.31.114 17:51, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Em, would have rather you posted this on my main talk X-)... Now I gotta move it, meh. will do that August. >.< 72.148.31.114 18:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

(I posted here b/c it's about the sandbox; it's not a generic comment.)

I never buy sets of 5 items, so I would prefer to see the price of a HoM-worthy set (i.e. without the headgear). — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 18:04, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

I don't either, not usually. Just usually get the main four. Once I'm done with the pages themselves. I'll do up a prestige type page of each profession and the costs without the headpieces. That work? 72.148.31.114 18:09, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

You might want to prototype first (that gives people more of a chance to comment before you do too much work). Looking forward to seeing what you come up with. — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 19:28, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Ya miss understood. :-) The main four/elite type armor without the price of the headpiece would of course be done on my userspace and stayed there linked from the other pages, if it's wanted. The current, is not major changes, but just consistent with all pages. That way it'd satisfy both, even if not on the actual pages for those collecting for HoM. It'd be available.72.148.31.114 20:17, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Comparable to collectors?

I think you've decided to avoid biting off more than you can chew and postponing armor collectors (which is, I think, the smart way to proceed — it's already a lot of work). However, I worry that we might end up rethinking crafters after taking a look at collectors. So, perhaps you can double-check that this system will be compatible w/collectors, e.g. by showing what it might look like applied to one crafter from each of the four campaigns. — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 17:48, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm confused. Crafting is easy, it's all with each other. Collector, however doesn't effect/affect all and as Konig pointed out on his talk. It's that if I tried doing the collector like the crafter. It'd b confusing for the type of items. I'm still thinking on how to work collector better. As far as I think, it's too long for smaller views, squishes up on my desktop. I want to fix that. Make the size more comparable to crafter. 72.148.31.114 17:53, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

And posted this too on main talk X-D haha... X-) No problems. Will move it all in August. 72.148.31.114 18:02, 30 July 2011 (UTC)