User talk:Raven78931

From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Hi, please stop reverting the content on General Kahyet; if you disagree with someone's revert, discuss on the talk page. Guild Wars Wiki:One-revert rule has more info. Thanks --User Brains12 circle sig.png Brains12 \ talk 20:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

hello[edit]

I'm not sure just exactly how this works. Or all of the TOS of this wiki. I did look at your talk page and I would like to note that you youself said this

Yeah, reverted. If you're that sure of something, be bold and do it :) -- Brains12 \ talk 00:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I am sure of the Story line information I am posting to the wiki. Isn't that the point of the WiKi?

My That comment was in regard to content that had not been reverted before, and is not/would not be under contention (i.e. a suggestion about the game on an image file page really does not belong - it's an obvious case). The content in question in this case, however, has already been the subject of contention - it's been reverted several times today, and those reverts have also been reverted. To resolve this issue, the best thing is to discuss on the talk page and reach a consensus - perhaps a compromise such as putting that information in the main article body (but in a more concise form) would be better.
As I linked, the revert-rule page explains how to deal with situations where multiple reverts are occurring. Don't worry, by the way - no one expects you to know the full details of policies when you edit. Most people will generally inform you about these things when necessary. --User Brains12 circle sig.png Brains12 \ talk 21:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not compleatly sure of what it is your saying about an Image file. I am not trying to comment, edit, or submit anything having to do with any images lol. I am also working on a dispute as I write this. What I am trying to do is write an edit on the main page of General Kahyet to include information that has been in game misrepresented so that future viewers can be more accuretly informed

I was referring to your comment about this edit in the section you saw on my talk page.
I understand what you're trying to do, but it's evidently contended. My point was that, instead of re-reverting, try and discuss the issue. --User Brains12 circle sig.png Brains12 \ talk 21:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

It seems their is some confusion as that post --- this --- was created in 2007 or something and modified in aug 2008... i joined this wiki Jan 18th 2009 and i asure you have never seen that before nor do i have any personal knowledges of GW 2 as i have Just gotten into GW 1 with my girlfriend a few months ago lol the only edit i have made was ..

==Story Line== It should be noted due to controversy that Kahyet is in fact Varesh's leading general in the story line until defeated by the player at which time General Morgahn becomes the leading general.


of whitch i have added the -{{disputed}}- tag so it can be desgussed as outlined in the terms you sent me origionaly :) for whish i am very greatfull you did.

I understand that. I was answering this comment you made: "I did look at your talk page and I would like to note that you youself said this: "Yeah, reverted. If you're that sure of something, be bold and do it :) -- Brains12 \ talk 00:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC)" ". The reason I said the sentence you quoted was because of the 2007/2008 edits. I'm not saying you edited that image page. I understand what edits you have made. I was explaining why I said that on my talk page, and how it differs to the edits on General Kahyet. If that's not clear enough, just ignore that part. --User Brains12 circle sig.png Brains12 \ talk 21:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

LoL ooh i see i do apologise for the .. confusion .. lol trying to do so many things at one time can lead to cross contaminations of thought proccesses :P of whitch i am guilty of on more than one ocasion ty for clearifying.