User talk:Vallen Frostweaver/Archive

---

Please feel free to leave me a message by clicking HERE.

---

Mess

This page totally mess up the design on the wiki, I don't know why. Even my watchlist and preferences links get smaller when viewing this page, and the boxes overlap the sidebar. I put this comment on top just because it get's messy when putting it below the userboxes. — Anja 10:12, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

If you noticed I was working onit. I had so much done I didn't want to lose the data so I saved it mid progress. It's finished now and should look much better.--File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 10:15, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Ah, sorry. I thought it was one of those "mess up in FF but not in IE" kind of things again, like I've always had with userboxes :) — Anja 10:23, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Not a problem. Good to know someone's watching though. Too often I've had my work go the way of the dodo due to an untimely power outage, kicking the cord, or just some error on windows that shuts down all my internet windows. I got paranoid that I was making so much progress that I had to save it before I was finished. Anyway, feel free to use them as you like if you so desire. :D --File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 10:26, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Welcome

Thank you for the welcome message : ) I'm still learning how to do stuff here, it's nice how helpful everyone is (despite how often I'm putting my feet into my mouth). Erasculio 12:59, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

Edit conflicts

Is the wiki not giving you edit conflicts when someone else changes a page while you are writing up a response? I'm just looking at this and this, and that's the only explanation I can come up with. Just letting you know so you can keep an eye out for this kind of thing; in icky discussions like on that Builds Wipe page, people might interpret their comment getting removed the wrong way, if they're not aware of what may be going on. Cheers! :) --Dirigible 16:47, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

Actually, No, I wasn't getting edit conflicts. O.O I guess I'll contact the bugs page and see what they say. I do recall those postings and did NOT receive any errors or conflicts. I would never remove someone's words like that unless it was accidental. Thanks for pointing it out.--File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 07:59, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

Slow down there, Cowboy.

Hey, hold off on the Guild page for the moment =P Yes, the Guild: namespace is up and running, but the policy regarding guild pages still has not been ratified, and, until that happens, all guild pages (other than the sexy little example page for the formatting guide) will be deleted. Thanks! MisterPepe talk 15:23, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

Will do. Let me copy the info to my sandbox quick then.--File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 15:25, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

Ok, all set. Saved me info for later.--File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 15:33, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

Free Profession userboxes

May I suggest that these go on another page, say a subpage of your userspace rather than your talk page? --Jamie 12:52, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

Done. --File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 13:11, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

Razah

You do realise it is spelt Razah not Rahzah. --Lemming64 14:32, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

sonova... --File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 14:43, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

Thanks. It's fixed now. Delete tag on the old one and new image u/l'ed with my links changed. Funny how I had it right on my image but when I u/l'ed it I got 'h' happy.--File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 14:49, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

Lower case

I think "Related Skills" should be "Related skills" in the skill articles. We agreed upon a lower case policy earlier on, I think it's in Formatting/Article names :) - Anja Astor (talk) 14:26, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

ok. I'll go back through and correct them. Might take me a little bit but I will. Thanks. --File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 14:29, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

All fixed. Apparently I wasn't even consistent in my use of capitals either and some didn't need reverting. Thanks for catching this. --File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 15:20, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

Hehe, then you are consistent from now on I hope, since I like to watch Recent changes sometimes ;) - Anja Astor (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

Double Big

Double <big>'s do nothing. Same as if one big. Save ur fingars lol, BLASTEDT 15:54, 20 April 2007 (EDT)

Yes it does (for me at least). I'll do screenies another time so you can see. Probably a firefox vs IE thing again. --File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 16:01, 20 April 2007 (EDT)

• Example of <big>
• Example of <big><big>
• Example of <big><big><big>

<<click to see full size --File:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG Vallen Frostweaver 16:20, 20 April 2007 (EDT)

This double and triple big do a difference for me. In FireFox. - Anja (talk) 17:13, 20 April 2007 (EDT)

Didn't know that....

• 10!

Ok, maybe 10 are a little overboard. BLASTEDT 18:52, 20 April 2007 (EDT)