User talk:Y0 ich halt/Rickroll

You'll never get me alive! (Though Brains almost did, until I checked the status bar to see what his "Shiny link" pointed to) — Galil 21:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

ok, now there's a goal for me >:D - Y0_ich_halt 13:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Why did I press Skakid's link... -- Brains12 \ Talk 21:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Cuz I'm awesome. — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 23:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

lol @ brains! i found that page code on different URIs, but i didn't wanna be that cruel :P - Y0_ich_halt 13:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

lol is there any way we can make this a GWW project?--The Forsaken One 15:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

What if I clickied a link to it but 1)had an idea that it wasn't a true link because an "lol" or something was tacked next to said link, 2) didn't get pissed, as the definition states, 3) combination of 1 n' 2. Seriously, I'm not an idiot. I've been on the internets for a long time and cal usually tell if a link ends up at meatspin or something.- Vanguard 15:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

you're rickrolled once you weren't expecting to be. if you already know it's a rickroll and click to check, you ruined the joke and therefore have not been rickrolled. so, e.g. if you're talking about armor and someone sends you a link to rickroll but you expect a nice armor drawing, you're rickrolled. - Y0_ich_halt 16:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Then I won't be added to the list, because I saw it coming. All the time :/- Vanguard 20:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

yeah sure :P - Y0_ich_halt 20:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

lol, good one, reithan :D - Y0_ich_halt 19:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

But.. but... Brains still has his shiny link! >.> — Galil 19:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Lol mine was obviously an external link, you just hid yours! -- Brains12 \ Talk 19:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

you didn't do elseway. :P - Y0_ich_halt 19:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Which means mine was more pro! :P — Galil 19:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

living proof it wasn't - Y0_ich_halt 19:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Pfft. You'll never get me! :D — Galil 19:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

You should click that, it's not Rickrolling as you know it (and it's quite funny :P) -- Brains12 \ Talk 19:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

aw :P thought maybe... - Y0_ich_halt 19:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

argh, that Scaryroll even tops those two manga earworms >.< mommy —ZerphaThe Improver 20:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

lol XD - Y0_ich_halt 20:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Your missing Rick Roll Extreme from your list. :P --Gummy Joe 22:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

check these out:

This User has been rickroll'd by Y0 .

Hehe	This user just rickroll'd you

--The Forsaken One 23:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I noticed Y0's Rickroll links and LOL'd at one or more of them

@vanguard: what do you mean by that? this section is about those links i posted at the top. - Y0_ich_halt 22:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Then your crap is misleading. delete my mess If I was wrong about something.- Vanguard 22:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

wasn't me. zerpha added that section :P (y0 at school once again) 91.18.239.183 08:39, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

yeah, thought it wouldn't bug anyone if i add this new section, as reithan already added another comparable long section before :P —ZerphaThe Improver 16:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Uh-oh. Never use GWWT again!!! -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

:D "Gotta rickroll 'em all, GWWT!" poke | talk 22:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

LOL -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Poke's priority list:

1. Create "Add rickroll link" with various link selections and cover-ups" to GWWT
2. Finish bot scripts
3. Breathe

Yep, sounds like Poke. Calor 22:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

lol, nice. - Y0_ich_halt 15:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Maybe a new topic?

Users who know that it doesn't take any skill to rickroll and therefore condemn Rickrollers' spite Too long, not short, too close, too too? Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 23:14, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

definetely too too - Y0_ich_halt 23:35, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Look, it lives^^. Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 00:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

and it can be pretty hard to rickroll someone, i've never beat galil yet. i made the most hideous sneak attacks possible and he always found out. - Y0_ich_halt 00:04, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

<.< look at the topic. The one to be rick-rolled is always smarter (at least has the chance to be). Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 00:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

"Users who know that it doesn't take any skill to rickroll" doesn't have anything to do with what you just said... kinda o.O - Y0_ich_halt 00:12, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

In a battle the one with more skill, bigger weapons or gimmicker (yes gimmicker) gimmicks wins. And rickrolling (or the attempt) is such a battle. Now, that we now that one party doesn't need (and thus cannot prove and rarely has) skill, it's very likely that people like Galil win. ... ... nah, forget what I told. It's a waste of time - a funny though. Ɲoɕʈɋɽɕɧ 00:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

you know what? i'll read this a second time when i get up tomorrow or the day after and maybe then i can talk about this... :D - Y0_ich_halt 00:19, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

The epic Rickrooll

I'm sure it will be on youtube at some point this afternoon. The Macy's Thanksgiving day parade has rickroll'd America.--Pyron Sy 17:00, 27 November 2008 (UTC)