User talk:Lilondra
From Guild Wars Wiki
User talk:Lilondra/archive1 User_talk:Lilondra/idiotarchive
WARNING : from now onn trolls by ip's and super igor will be removed instantly ALSO normal comments made by super igor will be moved to my idiotarchive. Lilondra
*poke* 16:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Noez need moar comments ! Lilondra 13:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
NO WAI Oo Lilondra 13:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Try
Instead of this way of linking, try User:Lilondra/gamebalance. Add a bar after if for other effects, like this:
[[User:Lilondra/gamebalance|Your custom text here]]
Will produce: Your custom text here - so you can replace the custom text bit with anything you'd like! --
People of Antioch 18:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] LOL
@That screenshot. Some people are just baed. ~Shard
17:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
i Know he even said i would get banned for it for 2 days :p Lilondra 17:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tone it down a bit pls
i know Super Igor has been doing a lot of trolling, as some may call it. But please dont aggrevate him, this will make everything calm down much faster. Thanks--
Raph Talky 02:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hey
Zag op Nuke talk dat je nederlands spreek/verstaat, je bent welkom om zo nu en dan ff hallo te zeggen ^^ - Magnus
Talk| 20:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] B o r e D
You guys alreayd noticed that (normally i dont waste time on making game balances ) somebody do something about it ! Invite me into a pvp guild (no i'm not ensign jr nor will i ever get close to 1 % of his experience) Lilondra 17:38, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Izzy's talk
To talk about skill balancing and skill issues, discuss at ArenaNet:Skill feedback and the appropriate subpages. Izzy's talk is for direct conversation with Izzy, not suggesting balance updates. Brains reverted your edit; go post in the appropriate place if you still wish to discuss the topic. Izzy looks at the skill feedback pages from time to time, and major discussions will likely be seen by him, so there's no need to bring it to his personal attention. calor (talk) 20:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Actually it is a direct discussion i'm not coming with balancing ideas only i'm coming with problems and ideas.Big problems.Also if izzy's talkpage is only for saying hi need any help with youre wikicoding then i dont know why there is any :/ Lilondra 10:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, problems and ideas regarding skills like your "Major problems" are exactly what goes into skill feedback pages, not Izzy's talk page. Your "Minor problems" are more discussion in nature so it might be acceptable, but do realise that discussions that may balloon into a large section is precisely what we're hoping to avoid. As Brains noted in his revert, try splitting your comments into different places. -- ab.er.rant
10:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Wich is quite impossible but nm apparently izzy doesnt realise mirror of ice is a problem Lilondra 14:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, problems and ideas regarding skills like your "Major problems" are exactly what goes into skill feedback pages, not Izzy's talk page. Your "Minor problems" are more discussion in nature so it might be acceptable, but do realise that discussions that may balloon into a large section is precisely what we're hoping to avoid. As Brains noted in his revert, try splitting your comments into different places. -- ab.er.rant
[edit] siggy test
Used nuclear's sig to start with (wiki noob here) will change it ^^ Lilondra
*poke* 07:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] So I heard...
You like attention? :o Halogod35
16:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- No shit sherlock ! (i just love sayin that) can you give my balance page (the talk) some attention ? Lilondra
*poke* 16:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Lol fine, but I love attention too! :( Halogod35
12:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Lol fine, but I love attention too! :( Halogod35
[edit] Signature
You'll have to reupload that icon as a user image, e.g. User Lilondra Eviscerate.jpg. Guild Wars Wiki:Sign your comments#Images has more info. --
Brains12 \ talk 19:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- I've done it for you -- replace the current image in your signature preferences with Image:User Lilondra Eviscerate.jpg. --
Brains12 \ talk 15:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thx Lilondra
*poke* 09:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Lilondra
|*Tourny* 16:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] GW Emulator
Check my user page. ~Shard
00:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Lilondra
*poke* 17:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Removing comments
Unless a comment is a violation of GWW:NPA you can archive them, but not just remove them. Sorry...--
Wyn 17:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
super igor is a violation of the NPA himself >< am i allowed to make a troll archive page and move all comments made by ip's and super igor to there ? Lilondra
*poke* 17:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- That's perfectly fine. --
Wyn 17:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- thx :) Lilondra
*poke* 17:58, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- thx :) Lilondra
- That's a retarded rule. It's not like they serve any purpose either way... -- Armond Warblade
01:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- look i dont want super igor to spam my page again and whenever i get trolled by someone who isnt super igor its an ip so i cant respond so i'm fine with it :/ Lilondra
*poke* 05:14, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- I meant the archived comments thing Wyn pointed out. No one's going to read the mindless spam and NPA regardless of whether it's archived or not, so why should you be forced to archive it instead of deleting them? -- Armond Warblade
13:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, removing spam and NPA is accepted.
- That, or Wyn needs to have a word with auron. Either way, I'll get some popcorn. -- NUKLEAR
IIV 17:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- I meant the archived comments thing Wyn pointed out. No one's going to read the mindless spam and NPA regardless of whether it's archived or not, so why should you be forced to archive it instead of deleting them? -- Armond Warblade
- look i dont want super igor to spam my page again and whenever i get trolled by someone who isnt super igor its an ip so i cant respond so i'm fine with it :/ Lilondra
- That's a retarded rule. It's not like they serve any purpose either way... -- Armond Warblade
[edit] :)
Man, diablo 3 is just going to be awesome :D Halogod35
02:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
indeed my friend indeed besides *poke*Lilondra
*poke* 04:42, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- for when is it announced? - Y0_ich_halt
16:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
no idea but it has diablo in it so Lilondra
*poke* 17:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Lol well they say it's coming out around 2009. Halogod35
01:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Lol well they say it's coming out around 2009. Halogod35
Who cares i'm in zn alliance with some people in it only.(few in the other guild only me in mine ) and I have a hard time remembering if i ever had this much fun then when i scrim them ^^ :) 91.177.244.126 07:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: fail
Super Igor, if you came back from a block only to continue harrassing others, you might as well stay away. Consider this as a warning, if you continue this useless spat again in 24 hours, I'll block you for a considerably longer amount of time.
Same warning for Lilondra: Even when provoked, it is not ok to attack others. You should rethink comments like this and the naming of your spam archive. --Xeeron 19:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Flames on Izzy's page
Ok, Lilondra, I'm going to tell you the same thing I told Shard earlier. Continuing flames against Izzy/Anet do not belong on this wiki. You have made it perfectly clear you think they are doing a bad job. So drop it. Your response, and opinion are not necessary on every post made on his talk page. If you have more you wish to say to him about how you feel he is doing a bad job put it in a forum, or an email directly to him. Additional posts of this kind will simply be removed as personal attacks. --
Wyn 09:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Oh and i offended him by saying what ? I dont see anything offending in my last post ? Lilondra
*poke* 10:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Lilondra, I may have come off more heavy handed than intended. Put it down to the hour long discussion that happened earlier regarding Shard's posts. It's a sore subject atm. I, and many others here are just fed up with the Izzy/ArenaNet bashing that is happening on this wiki that they provide for us to document the game we all at one time loved so much. Some of us still do. I understand how frustrated people are with the way things are, but beating them up repeatedly is not going to change it. Offering constructive feedback on how skills are/are not working is fine, and appropriate. I think we all know that not a lot is going to change because the vast majority of their time and resources are being spent trying to develop GW2 into a game everyone will love and rush out to buy, but I do believe that Izzy is doing the best he can with the time he has available, and I just accept that it will never be the great game it could be. They basically gave up on it when they decided to change gears and do GW2. --
Wyn 13:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well I'm quite pissed at izzy for destroying such a great game but hey who isnt.Raging at him wont help like you said hell turn from confused to angry and confused.I wont post things to offend him on his talk page but I still find his ideas of balancing quite bad I hope izzy proves me wrong Lilondra
*poke* 13:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Well I'm quite pissed at izzy for destroying such a great game but hey who isnt.Raging at him wont help like you said hell turn from confused to angry and confused.I wont post things to offend him on his talk page but I still find his ideas of balancing quite bad I hope izzy proves me wrong Lilondra
[edit] See the most recent update yet?
Whee, aimed almost entirely at sins. *sarcasm*Isn't it wonderful being Anet's favorites? In all seriousness, am I the only one who thinks it's funny that despite Rangers banging their heads on their keyboards and winning fights with escape scythe, sins who intelligently used FGJ and Backbreaker to start dagger combos, which required an extra technique in canceling the lag on the weapon switch, get nerfed first? They really care about mixing up the metagame and making it require skill. --Kalas Silvern 23:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
As long as sins are this gimmicky they should be nerfed.Its sad but true BB sin deserved the kill but they need to get positive (not gimmicky) buffs Lilondra
*poke* 07:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Also i just checked and nothing changes at 12 hammer mastery you get 4 seconds of KD ! 4 bloody seconds -.- Lilondra
*poke* 10:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Anet fails, and will continue to fail until they fix all the broken gimmicks. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:71.174.21.250 (talk).
Canceling the lag on weapon swapping required about as much askill as any other weapon swapping did. Indeed, you can simply rebind your keyboard and mash 1234567890 with that build. -- Armond Warblade
{{Bacon}} 20:41, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, canceling the lag is probably a bug. Calling it intelligent is like calling it intelligent to dump SV, parasite, etc on the guild lord and ball up around him. Yeah, it's a new technique, and yeah, it takes an extra bit of thought process to use, and yeah, it's successful, but that doesn't mean it's balanced or intended. -- Armond Warblade
{{Bacon}} 20:46, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Definitely didn't phrase that right. The intelligent part was seeing that it could be done, and it did require a little more effort than Escape Scythe. I've agreed before on gimmicky builds being nerfed, I'm just getting a bit tired of seeing "Nerfed because sins were too good with it", while never seeing something to rectify the problems that lead to us hunting for these skill combos to make up for all the nerfs. I never did use this build, so I would hope you'd take that into consideration. I was not defending it, more attacking Anet for ignoring a glaring imbalance while we sins continue to get every possible combo nerfed to the ground. I also think it's buggy Armond, but it was something new that required more thought than some current builds at least. --Kalas Silvern 02:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
I agree with you that sins need a buff but more like a give them a new position one Lilondra
*poke* 17:19, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, this was more of a "Look, they aimed another entire update at nerfing sins, and escape scythe still exists!" than anything else. Though I do stand by my comment that weapon swapping for a combo takes more skill than escape scythe. Good thing I'm having fun in WoW, GW has lost almost everything that made it fun. --Kalas Silvern 05:23, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] sealed deck
Are you going to limit the sealed deck to those skills? ~Shard
19:08, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Pretty much ;) it needs some adjustment :) Note that any skill that does not have the limited thing can be used as many times they like Lilondra
*poke* 07:46, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'd take out rend enchantments, channeling, wastrel's worry, savage shot, otyugh's cry, restore condition, fall back, and shadow prison. Also one of the monk hex removals, doesn't matter which one, right now you have too much of it and very few hexes. ~Shard
23:16, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Droppin : Shadow prison,Rend enchants,wastrel's worry,otyugh's cry and channeling.Dont know about RC savage shot and fall back though Lilondra
*poke* 17:16, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
You shouldn't have an external link (or an internal link that isn't your userpage, talk page, or contribution page) in your sig, btw. You can keep pages you want to "advertise" linked on your userpage, which is really where they belong. --
Brains12 \ talk 19:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Awh brains :( kay Lilondra
|*Tourny* 05:32, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
- As Shard mentioned on Izzy's page, our guild would be interested in participating :)--*Yasmin Parvaneh*
22:58, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- As Shard mentioned on Izzy's page, our guild would be interested in participating :)--*Yasmin Parvaneh*
Nice :) i'm with a grim monolith guy can i have youre name ? Lilondra
*poke* 07:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- IGN and wiki name Yasmin Parvaneh. --*Yasmin Parvaneh*
07:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- IGN and wiki name Yasmin Parvaneh. --*Yasmin Parvaneh*
- If you guys have a full team please register as a guild name if you guys dont register seperatly 91.177.240.205 11:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hey...
SHOCK PWNS GALE MMK?
Congrats xD -- Halogod35
Thx Lilondra
*gale* 19:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Lol, so why the random love of gale? -- Halogod35
04:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] GW iz srs bsnss
That quote you said reminds me of Auron...or was it Shard? I think it was Nuclear... they all sound the same somehow. Who said the same thing, he only played GvG because it was "...srs bsnss" and I was like "pfffffffffft...", those guys should get out and smell the peaches once in a while. Anyhow, good luck with Gale, although I recommend going lemmingway taking Shock.--ShadowFog 11:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

