User talk:Vael Victus

From Guild Wars Wiki

WELCOME TO THE FRIENDLIEST TALK PAGE ON Guild Wars Official Wiki, PLEASE IF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS, PUT THEM HERE, AND AS LONG AS YOU ARE NOT AN ASSHAT, I WILL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO TALK TO YOU.

PS: wares mai blink tag ;;

[edit] Grind

I hate grinding as much as you do. I can work toward any title, but I don't feel like it so I just bounce around through the titles doing stuff. Unless of course its something easy that can be done pretty quickly like Protector titles. --HeLlBrInGeR talk 00:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

You mistake me! I don't mind grind at all. Put on some heavy metal, maybe an audio clip or something, it's fine. It's when, like in Guild Wars, it does absolutely nothing for the character. It feels like ANet is trying to own (not pwn) us. 10,000 minutes of my life for some stupid drunk title? Puh-lease. Vael Victus 18:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April Fools

You're a tricky one, aren't you? :P --Alreajk

No. Vael Victus 01:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] signature

What are you trying to do with it exactly? Obviously you can't show me, since its not working, but I'm confused on how to help. — THARKUN 05:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

You know, this has been happening a lot lately. I'll write a message to [x] person saying what my problem is, and in the process, figure it out. o.o; Thank you. I guess I just needed to space it more. Vael Victus 13:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind. Look, I can just type in your thing User_talk:Tharkun|THARKUN with the [[ ]] and it'll work. But when I put in my name, REGARDLESS if I try to bring the space with " " or "_", it won't make a link. Just a bolded word. :( <a href='http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User:Vael_Victus'>Vael Victus</a> 14:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Something like this: - Vael Victus ? Or with your talk page: Vael Victus talk . Or even split your name to cover both: Vael Victus. Some things to keep in mind when looking at the code: you can use font or span; I just mixed it up because I was borrowing from another green-signatured user who uses span. It doesn't matter except as much as you prefer to follow w3c conventions. Also, links to the page you're currently on don't make links; they simply go bold and do nothing. Thus, your talk page link won't work when its on your own talk page, and your username link won't work when its on your userpage. Don't feel stupid.. well, you can, but know that I was just as confused as you about this until I asked for help too. So at least you have company. But if you sign elsewhere with any of those options (like my usertalk page, if you want to test), it should work just fine; I previewed the changes there and they all seemed to work. Hope that helps. — THARKUN

18:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome for the help. By the way, though, if you want to use an image in your sig, you need to upload it separately for your use. So in this case, you'll need to download the Insidious Parasite image, rename it to User Vael Victus sig (or something starting with User Vael Victus) and then reupload it at Special:Upload. You can then change the link in your sig to point to it instead of IP. That's per the rules in the user policy, which you can reference if you have any questions (or post here or on my talk page). If you have any questions, let me know. — THARKUN

21:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Looks good! — THARKUN

04:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Me too

I see you do AB and trade Passage scrolls and Jade shards. I trade Passage scrools, personally. What i tend to do is wait for a day when they sell for 150g or more (I sold around 16 for 170g once) and then sell them all then. You make more money, but it does require extreme patience.--Burning Freebies 13:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Now I could look in the history to see who said this, but I kinda like the idea of a mystery writer. Okay, so cool, thanks for the PROTIP I guess. Honestly I just made like 35k by selling those stupid zaishen keys, man, NO ONE knows how to get them. xD So yeah I mean the shards are nice, but in comparison... :P Vael Victus

00:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, had to ruin your mystery writer with {{unsigned}} XD — ク Eloc 貢 06:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Asshole. Vael Victus

13:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Please read over GWW:NPA. — ク Eloc 貢 16:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Please read over GWW:NPA. I hope you understand that. Vael Victus

19:22, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, good luck with making money. Im using the Balthazar faction for some builds for my heroes currently, but I will be buying keys instead when i have the skills. I have to get 470k to fill my hall (i will take a long time, but im willing to wait!) --Burning Freebies 13:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Fill your hall with what? Vael Victus

22:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

The section above and Regina's talk page are perfect examples of how some of your recent comments are unnecessary. Keep your comments civil without personally attacking other people. -- Brains12 \ Talk 01:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

The one above attacked me first and the one on Regina's page wasn't even that bad. I'll uh, "chill out" on them. Vael Victus

01:15, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

That is a perfect example of "Well he did it first so I will do it back". When someone else breaks the rules, try not to do the same ok :) --Shadowphoenix

01:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Bah, but where's the fun in that!! !!@@ Vael Victus

15:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

How did I attack you? =S — ク Eloc 貢 03:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Obviously I wanted to keep the mystery reader. I liked the idea of the mystery reader. But you, trolling under the guise of being a nice little sysop, so helpfully ruined the fun for me. It's my talk page, you really didn't improve the wiki at all by putting that person's name there. What's worse is me, being very very slightly angry, just called you a faggot for it. However, I felt it was a bit much, ( 'cuz wiki people are obviously very sensitive) so I just put "asshole", but then you had the nerve to tell me to behave myself, when you first trolled me!!! !!! And that's what happened. Honestly I feel your little "be nice to people" stuff is total bullshit, I mean, our world's tearing itself at the seams, and the most you people can worry about is whether someone calls someone an asshole on the internet. Like seriously, lol. Vael Victus

15:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Crap before you say anything.

Sorry I wasn't sure if it was a talk page or not. xP I mean the uh, the candidate thing. I saw the sig and just went nutzzz. Vael Victus 01:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hey

Hey, hows it going Vael. Good to see you still playing. Solostaran 21:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, thanks. :P I'm a bit on-and-offy but it's cool. I heard you got into another guild. I saw it, too. Honestly I was thinking of joining 'cuz the guild I'm with now (your sister's) does shit for PvP, and pretty much anything unrelated to Big's titles. ._.;; Vael Victus

23:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I started a guild with a bunch of friends I met. My Sister's was a great place to start out learning things, but I have more or less moved on from that level of play. Been doing a lot of RA/GvG/HA, been good times. High end PvP is quite a bit of fun when you have the people to play with you. PvE gets boring fast, but they enjoy it, so I moved on, I still stay in contact with them. Solostaran 00:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Is there room open in your guild? And would you have a good way to contact me (xfire, soulseek) if I joined? Vael Victus

20:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

I responded to you on my page mate, but from reading your user page I can see you really want to get into high end PvP and unfortunately LaZy doesn't do ANY PvP. (which is a shame) Of course if you fulfill our requirements you're still welcome to join but at the same time I dont want you to be bored if you do. So was just a heads up. :) -- Salome

12:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] inb4

People get mad at me:

_____________________

Be angry in the lines. Vael Victus 00:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ahem...

now that was naughty. bad vael victus!--Sum Mesmer Guy contribs 06:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I said to be angry in the lines above! >:( Don't you listen?! Vael Victus

20:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

pardon?--Sum Mesmer Guy

contribs 06:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

http://wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Vael_Victus&redirect=no#inb4 CLICK THAT Vael Victus

19:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] name

what's it supposed to mean? i know the quote "vae victis" from kaine in legacy of kain, blood omen I, so i'd guess you just couldn't understand clearly what he says (me neither, but i could guess it from latin) :P - Y0_ich_halt 18:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

A bunch of utopian friends of mine are working toward a secret goal I'm not going to tell you about. Since I'm the head (founder) of the project, we decided to go with Vael Victus as a name for the universal body we possess. Around each other, they call me Vael, and everyone behind him (him being the internet entity) has chosen a letter to represent themselves by for cleanliness purposes. So, the guy who trolls a lot of people as me is actually Mael, because I don't really like trolling that much, and the guy who is writing a book as me we just call Sael.

Getting back to your question, Vael Victus was chosen by a random name generator (we spent about an hour deciding upon it) because it rolls off the tongue and we could do the letter thing with it.

Anything else? We have a website at www.vaelvictus.com if you're too lazy to google. ;) Vael Victus

19:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

wow, i love randomized latin-sounding names! :D - Y0_ich_halt

19:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

So do we. Incidently, "victus" also means "lively", so we lucked out with that one. Vael Victus

19:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

not really. victus is the beaten one (i.e. the one who lost to the winner, victor) ;) you could say vael is a typo and it was supposed to be "vale" ("live well", as in "stay healthy") XD "vale victus" would actually be correct (though not really great) latin and mean "cheer up, loser". - Y0_ich_halt

19:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Saying "not really" has always prompted me to actually go through the loops to prove you wrong and in the process be rude as I am now.

"victus : living, manner of life / nourishment, food. "

As of http://www.archives.nd.edu/cgi-bin/lookit.pl?latin=victus

http://www.freedict.com/onldict/onldict.php that one too. Do you claim to know latin better than two different sources? Vael Victus

19:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

second link is broken ;) i do understand that need to prove the other wrong, i have it too. so i apologize, coulda thought of that beforehand. victus does indeed have two meanings. the first is the one coming from "vincere" (to beat s.o. or to win), victus is the past participle, which can also be used as a passive personification, giving it the meaning "the beaten one". the totally different meaning is the one mentioned as second meaning in good dictionaries: food, etc, but not lively. lively would be "vivens", "vitalis", "valens". won't beat me with that, i have a printed dictionary and i'm gonna use it ;)> (and four years of latin lessons). - Y0_ich_halt

20:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Food it is. Thank you! Vael Victus

21:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

(it is food, rite?) Vael Victus

21:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

yup, food XD - Y0_ich_halt

14:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nomination

Unfortunately, the nomination stage has ended, which means that no new candidates may be added. *Defiant Elements* +talk 14:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

DAMNIT. I read it wrong. How embarrasing. I knew something was up. Oh well, next 6-months. :( Vael Victus

14:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

No worries. Besides, you only have to wait 2 months for the next election phase.

*Defiant Elements* +talk 14:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

You give me hope where there is none. August here I come? Vael Victus

14:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Remember, kid,

if your going to say something at least know what your talking about. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 05:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh shit I completely didn't see this at all. Well we usually don't talk unless we know we're right so I'll prod you to see what's going on. oo; Vael Victus

22:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, this was about this comment you made about skill, which is...completely false. Skill is how well you use your build and other game mechanics at your disposal. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 23:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

But babe that was obviously sarcasm. o.o; I'm quite aware of how to have skill in GW. I'd type it up, but we'd end up agreeing. I've actually got like three or four saved builds for RA and AB that test your skill and quick-thinking skills. I was merely remarking that people just go to PvX wiki and find some build which is genuinely viable in battle, and it does unfortunately work against the people with original builds they thought of themself. Vael Victus

01:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New PvP o.O

Hi there, funny guy^^. I saw what you wrote on your front page about a new random random PvP. And I'm still gasping for air to overcome the shock I'm in after finding such a BRILLIANT idea! If the different builds would be many and still balanced, this would be truly bringing the essence of the original Guild Wars back to the game. A game based upon skills and skills only. (At least for this part of the game) /Signed, stamped, and sent to AN - twice! -- Titus The Third 05:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

if there were premade builds (not really sensical ones, but premades) that would surely be usable at all (like the hero brawling was), that would be really great, but if you really only mix 8 skills of your primary and a random secondary, you will definetely get builds like this:

Frenzy

totally random, and totally useless. that would make games depend fully on luck. so to integrate something like these arenas, anet would either have to configure a generator which would throw together random, playable builds or they would have to make premades again. no already released mmo will ever get an addition like that past-release. especially if the devs are already making the next game. i do like the idea though ^^ - Y0_ich_halt 12:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Mmm... no. If you do pre-made builds, then everyone will just memorize all the stupid builds and it'll be buildwars again. Builds in GW generally need most of the skills to do their amazing combo's. So the match starts, you're given one random elite, a res sig, and six other skills. You've got 30 seconds to figure out what to do with them. There's a lot of elites out there to mess with. The chance someone will get an "amazing build" is not much, and the chance they know how to use their "amazing build" is even less likely.

This also encourages people to use different skills and think differently... if they start winning with Well of Power, maybe they'll want to start using it in other places! :D Vael Victus

12:47, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

PS: and if you are worried about bad builds like you posted, which I'm sure would just be a rare scenario in itself, then the GW team of course will put a little effort into making sure if you're a sin, that you'll have a lead, off-hand, and dual attack. Vael Victus

12:47, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

please don't start with the "mm..no.", ok? we had that already. ;) also, the chance that you get a useless build is actually pretty high if you really mix 6 totally random skills from two classes, limit to four attributes or three or not. even if you get a combination that's per se good (like Mo/E), with a really random generator it would still be a good chance that you get stuff like Signet of Judgment (smiting prayers) + water magic + divine favor. and that would be one of the nicer combinations you could get. if you want to, we could try to develop a generating system (implementation will be anet's stuff) that would generate usable builds that are still random. - Y0_ich_halt

14:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

also, no illusioning, anet is never gonna even think about implementing something like this in the current guild wars. if they were interested in listening to user's suggestions that much, they would've balanced quite some stuff way better. - Y0_ich_halt

14:16, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about the no thing. Anyway, I wouldn't think it would work with 3 attributes. :P I'd imagine either the game would pick two attributes for you, or maybe it would even be acceptable to just have it so you pick the attributes you want, along with adding the equipment bonuses you want. Then the game would pick 7 skills of the attribute you've got, and the elite would be picked from the highest you put your attributes. (if even, just pick one randomly)

Shamme it'll never be done, really, because I think it's got the potential to, besides GvG, be the only part of GW where it's not just buildwars. Although AB isn't too bad about buildwars either. Vael Victus

14:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

the prob is that guild wars is build wars afterall. that's what it's about. if you wanna play with skill only, go play some game like WoW where everyone can use the same skills depending on their level, so between two same class same level only skill decides. in guild wars, skill was supposed to be expressed through builds, but because everyone can just use the builds others use, that's a kinda flawed concept. - Y0_ich_halt

14:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

o.o Have you ever played WoW? If you want skill, you go play uhm, another genre of game. I was so dissatisfied by the lack of depth in PvP in WoW that I quit. That and ganking. Vael Victus

14:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

i didn't say WoW requires skill (absolute) (i did play it for three months), but between, say, two lv28 thieves it would be mostly skill deciding (relative). - Y0_ich_halt

14:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

WoW requires even less skill than even gw. —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 16:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

WoW fails. OHKO's and 3 second deaths?? lulz. Why did anyone even say WoW?

Phill Gaston 11:52, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I tl;dr'd at Way of the Master on a daggers build, along with Frenzy with Shadow Walk as a cancel (and vice versa). -- Armond Warblade {{Bacon}} 22:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] =<

Can I put secks on you?

Phill Gaston 11:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

It is technically possible though not particularly enjoyable for me. So what's your favorite kind of peaceful music? Vael Victus

13:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] perhaps

Gw is better of with gettin the current forms of pvp fixed before they introduce another form they wont be able to balance (not that they would have to but you know what i mean) Lilondra *poke* 17:05, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I know. It's just a thought. I just find it kinda funny (not really) how people refer to GW as needing skill. Meh? They put skill into MMO's with Star Wars and everyone left, rofl gg. Vael Victus

17:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Happy Birthday!

--Silverleaf Don't assume, ask! 13:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

agree - Y0_ich_halt

13:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Happy Birthday man! — Wolf

14:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Woah hey. :o Thanks, guys. Vael Victus

14:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Birthday Happy Victus Vael! |Foul Bane| 15:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!!! Have a great day ^^ |Cyan Light

Boooh!!!| 16:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] composing

what kinda music? - Y0_ich_halt 14:22, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Depends what people need. Right now I'm taking a break so I can finish MonBre and focus seriously on music, but here:

http://monbre.com/VaelMusic.rar

That's what I finished before I unplugged my keyboard so I wouldn't be tempted to make more music. :~ The most impressive one I think is orchestral impression 1, and the most fun I had making was definitely Apartment Scenes. The only reason I put Audio Surfin' in was because I liked the part at the end, and you can audio surf to the song anyway... Vael Victus

15:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Also, your page says you're running low on cash. Do you mind internet work? Vael Victus

15:54, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

what kind of work would that be? - Y0_ich_halt

16:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Well that'd be where I work: ChaCha. www.chacha.com it's a question-answering service. We get paid either 10 cents or 20 cents a question. (depending if you take it seriously or not) I make about $11 an hour on normal days, and probably like $16 on weekends due to bonuses they've got. If you're serious about it, tell me and I'll give you my referral code so we can work in a team. (and I get a referral bonus) Vael Victus

18:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

i'd find it suspicious normally, but since you seem like you've been doing it for a while now, i'll try. - Y0_ich_halt

18:23, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

what software did you use? - Y0_ich_halt

16:11, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

I use Cubase and a whole lot of VSTs for the music. I mostly use Vapor VST, Symphonic Orchestra, and Colossus. I'll use a lot of free VSTs and effects for the scary music. (apartment scenes) Did you like it? Vael Victus

18:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

it was too short D: - Y0_ich_halt

18:23, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warhammer

You may want to read this. Dominator Matrix 01:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

And if you can't trust a corporation with a major stake in things, who can't you trust, amirite? --216.241.108.106 01:31, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Well the way I see it, matrix, and thank you for the link... Warhammer said they have like 750k players. As long as an MMO has about 100k, they can rake in profits and have a bunch of people on one server having fun. See: EVE, which has like a concurrent 50k.

That being said, many people are dumb. Look back at WoW's first patch notes, and see how ridiculous some of those bugs and lack of content were. This is normal for an MMO. What killed AoC was the fact they rushed it and didn't have key elements ready. (among other things) So those WoW players who quit for it, meh. They have a new expansion coming out, and they were bitten by the bug.

That being said, I actually don't find WoW that much fun any more, and quit because I'm a PvPer at heart. I can't say no to this RvR, it just sounds so fun, and public quests too. On top of that, it just looks genuinely fun. I like starting new MMOs. So again, thanks for the link, but I think I might just have my next MMO chosen, and quite frankly, I don't think it'll be GW2. Vael Victus

02:20, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Something like 35% of MMO players have below-normal intelligence. An additional 20% are definitively stupid; a further 25-35% (depending on the game) are decidedly dumbtarded. -- Armond Warblade

{{Bacon}} 04:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Nah it's just that people expect warhammer to be on the same level of WoW, when WoW's had like what, 6 years of development or something? Not to mention the game racks in a rough $150 million (10 million subscribers at $15) a month so they've got dev teams of huge amounts. I'm perfectly fine with waiting 'till after Christmas. I realized yesterday I'd still have to actually buy warhammer which is $50 and then pay the subscription, so I'm hoping for a free trial at least first. I sure hope L4D is as good as they say it'll be... Vael Victus

13:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Note from Future Vael - it wasn't. Vael Victus

14:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Happy Birthday

Happy Birthday, I hope you have a great day.- TheRave (talk) 05:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

^ -- Armond Warblade

{{Bacon}} 05:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

rofl. Thanks Rave. <3! Vael Victus

13:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

yeh happy birthday :D --Cancer Angel

14:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

thank u Vael Victus

15:44, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] You say

you'll be equipping up a triple necro hero team? Were I you, I would just equip up the PvE Paraway team. It's so much more imba it's not even funny. -- Armond Warblade {{Bacon}} 22:09, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah but I'm pretty much done with GW. I lost interest when I got my titles which showed me I had more interest in GW2 than grinding this shit. And honestly it looks like I'm going to be maining Warhammer for quite some time when I get around to it. Dystopia's going to be released soon, and I'm still trying to finish watching Samurai Jack and Cowboy Bebop. Then we've got L4D. My un-social free time is really bound up. I'll be here for the costume brawl, though! Vael Victus

04:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

GW is bad game. That said, it had a bunch of good points, which I hope to learn from when I make my MMO. -- Armond Warblade

{{Bacon}} 04:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

GW only did three things fundamentally wrong. 1: re-inventing the game multiple times realy doesn't work, hence GW2, which leads to 2: too many skills, once again, hence GW2, and 3: Lacking on some useful features. Point 3 doesnt make or break a game. GW over-all has very sound mechanics, and is remarkably well balanced compared to many other MMOs I've played *coughwowcough* Atleast Anet TRIES to balanace GW. WoW has a great feature-set, but it's mechanics are broken on the fundamental level. Any part of a game falls into one of 3 categories, mechanics, features, or UI. Most MMOs that have stayed afloat have a good UI, which is rather important, as are sound mechanics, which most MMOs phail at, and where GW shines the most. Too many hark back Everquest and use dated mechanics b/c that's all people know, and they are scared to change it, and think, "Hey, if it isn't broken, don't fix it, right?" WRONG! It's was broken when it was born, but it was still a breakthrough for the time. 5-10 years down the line, THINK OF SOMETHING NEW! Don't keep dragging the same old POS back from the grave just because it looks OK, and your too scared to try something different! Improving an MMO DOES NOT constitue adding tons of cool features. All the good features in the world don't mena a thing if your mechanics are so broken, the game is not enjoyable. GW at it's very birth was an experiment, an attempt at breakin the mold. Now, a few years later, after a revision or two, and some playing and figuring, Anet knows what it got wrong and is now working on the real deal. People say GW2 is going to be a WoW Clone, and I say WRONG! Sure, GW2 is going to pick up a feature or two that WoW had and was nice, and become mor epersistant (HELLO! WoW IS NOT the only fully persistant MMO) But GW2 mechanics are going to stay pretty much the same, as those WORK and are what make GW, GW and are the first to NOT be broken. Yes, GW has flaws, what game doesn't, but Anet is a smart bunch, and learns from their mistakes, and I'm confident GW2 will show this. — Wolf

04:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I have to disagree with your points that GW is balanced compared to WoW and that ANet knows what they're doing. Force of habit. -- Armond Warblade

{{Bacon}} 14:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

wot? compared to WoW? I'll tell you I'd have to say it's genuinely unbalanced, but compared to WoW, I dunno... did I ever tell you about the time I was feared thrice? Fear once, okay, use my trinket. Fear again, okay, use wail of the undead or w/e. Then a third one comes and fears me off a fucking cliff. Like seriously, how is that fun? Does Blizzard even try to make balanced PvP? Vael Victus

14:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Quite honestly no. WoW was designed for PvE - the devs honestly didn't expect the PvP would be wanted pretty much at all. PvP servers weren't expected to be populated by more than, like, a hundred people - take a look at Stranglethorn Vale. Also, ever heard of Berserker Rage? -- Armond Warblade

{{Bacon}} 14:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

i think armond got the point here. wow is a pve game, and wow pve is perfectly balanced compared to gw's fucked up pve skill and item shit. - Y0_ich_halt

15:03, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

No, not really, but I won't go into that right now. -- Armond Warblade

{{Bacon}} 15:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

WoW PvE is still broken, but not on the skill level, but in the BASIC WAY IT WORKS! WoW is 100% broken on the fundamental level. Yes, GW has gotten screwed up over time, but wtf do you think GW2 is for? No company ever gets it right the first time around. — Wolf

21:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE:I want to give you a bunch of mini's

Thanks for the message! Hit me up in game sometime. I will be in game if you'd like to contact me. Thank you again for doing your best to help with the event! Its going to be so big! I hope to see you there!!! - Tesla 00:28, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

THE TRANSACTION WAS COMPLETED AND BOTH PARTIES WERE PLEASED. Vael Victus

02:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Sexually?

^Teo^ 21:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

It's funnier with the "It's going to be so big" comment.--

anguard 21:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

LOL, internet. xD Vael Victus

00:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

It's all LOL INTERNETS! Anyway. — Jon

Lupen 01:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Happy Valentine's Day!

Happy V-Day!!! - Tesla 00:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

I am immune to love. Vael Victus

14:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] you sir

have a grudge against Regina. Vili 03:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Slightly. I am disappointed in her. She keeps running from all her problems. From some stories she's told me of her life when I thought we were at least internet acquaintances, running has always been in her personality. Vael Victus

15:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Happy Birthday 2009

Congratulations! -- Cyan 11:13, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

+1 - J.P.

Talk 16:57, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Heh thanks folks. :) Vael Victus

16:12, 21 October 2009 (UTC)