ArenaNet talk:Guild Wars 2 suggestions/Acount banning vs. Ingame punishment
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
.....what is this? I like the idea but the methods seem like we just devolved into the slave-master age.Pika Fan 20:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think its hilarious. But yeah, the sadism should be turned down a notch. It should be similar to the Dishonor system, e.g. If you are scamming, you are prohibited from trading/selling, if you spam in chat, local/trade channel is disabled, etc. --mira castillo 20:53, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Dunno, doesn't seem like enough. A little sadism can be a good thing when dealing with these kinds of people. The Dishonor system idea really doesn't seem to be enough. It doesn't seem to be more than a slap on the wrist. And GW could use a little more role-playing, though some of the ideas in the suggestion page are a bit much. Shall meditate on this.--Will Greyhawk 17:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- In the hands of a competent game company, this would be an awesome idea. However, in the hands of anet, it would be completely unfair. Right now the only people they DONT punish are people who exploit bugs. Great system they've got going right now huh? ~Shard
03:23, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- In the hands of a competent game company, this would be an awesome idea. However, in the hands of anet, it would be completely unfair. Right now the only people they DONT punish are people who exploit bugs. Great system they've got going right now huh? ~Shard
- Dunno, doesn't seem like enough. A little sadism can be a good thing when dealing with these kinds of people. The Dishonor system idea really doesn't seem to be enough. It doesn't seem to be more than a slap on the wrist. And GW could use a little more role-playing, though some of the ideas in the suggestion page are a bit much. Shall meditate on this.--Will Greyhawk 17:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
