ArenaNet talk:Skill feedback/Ranger/Poison Tip Signet

Note: As of September 2, 2009 this page is no longer active. If you have suggestions for Guild Wars skills please go to Feedback:Main to learn how to submit suggestions that ArenaNet can use.

A. von Rin's Discussion

This proposal would also allow it to be useful with Volley/Barrage--74.61.209.219 01:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

And this would be bad? A. von Rin 02:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Would this be good?--Underwood 02:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Better, yes. At a normal Wilderness Survival attribute level you wouldn't poison 1 foe but 2 (considering every single arrow triggers). Wow! Not really a problem, just a bit better for primaries... A. von Rin 02:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

But if I'm a primary ranger I would use expertise to reduce the cost of apply and not have to re-apply Poison Tip Signet every other attack. But idk that's just what some people would say. I really don't care what happens to this skill.--Underwood 02:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Apply doesn't work with barrage. That is also likely to be the reason that Poison tip signet does not: They dont want rangers keep an entire group poisoned with a single skill. --Xeeron 13:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Technically, this does work with Barrage / Volley, but since it only last for a single attack and barrage / volley are considered multiple attacks, only your prime target is effected Dargon 18:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I like this suggestion. Dark Morphon(contribs) 16:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

referring to Xeeron's point, bah, If that is the reason, we rangers can already do that. -- nuke7 File:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 00:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

This skill is fine as it is, it costs no energy. You get what you pay for.

Following this logic every single signet had to be useless, but I heard some signets were good... A. von Rin 21:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

What he means to say is "The effect is dilute because it is free, and I think he was referring to Xeeron. -- NUKLEAR IIV 14:03, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Seeing as this is an old topic and there really is no issue, I'm putting a deletion tag unless anyone objects.

The issue would be "fairly useless". I would argue in favour of keeping it. -- NUKLEAR IIV 15:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)