ArenaNet talk:Skill feedback/Warrior/Protector's Strike

Note: As of September 2, 2009 this page is no longer active. If you have suggestions for Guild Wars skills please go to Feedback:Main to learn how to submit suggestions that ArenaNet can use.

If you make this 1s, then how exactly is it comparable to Bull Strike? Even now ppl rather take Bull's. Protector is fine.--Vort3x 10:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

It isn't used as an IAS, it is used to meet the condition on Lyssa more easily. That said, I don't see it as a problem and don't see why a perfectly fine skill should be changed. Dutchsmurf 13:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

The condition on AoL is to hit your target. Hitting faster is how you meet that condition more easily. It's an IAS. After the speed nerfs to Critical Chop and Agonizing Chop, I don't see why this should be 1/2. 198.53.176.173 22:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Critical and Agonizing were fast-attack interrupts that dealt bonus damage. This just dealt bonus damage. I suppose you'd like to see Harrier's Toss nerfed too. 76.89.81.150 00:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

I suggest you look up Avatar of Lyssa before making comments about it. And it can be easily kept at 1/2, because it isn't causing serious problems at 1/2. Dutchsmurf 15:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

IF the said lyssa is using prot strike instead of an IAS stance, Increase cast time, assasin chain or mystic/eremites fast activation, that said lyssa needs to fail less. File:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg nuke7 File:Nuclear7 sig image2.jpg 12:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Who the fuck runs AoL? Prot Strike is balanced. 74.14.106.47 04:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)