Feedback talk:User/Falconeye/Mesmer Skills
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
How about: Hex Spell. Interrupt target foe. For 10 seconds, target foe is Hexed with Web of Disruption. When this Hex ends, that foe is interrupted again and if a spell is interrupted in this way, this hex is reapplied. Probably overpowered, but I like the idea.-Ninjatek 00:10, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Actually i like how the skill works at the moment and use it quite often. Lou Wolfskin 10:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed, I do not see what is wrong with the current version. Koda Kumi 11:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
"Scaleable effect rewards proper skill usag"
How? :P Dark Morphon 08:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Not underpowered[edit]
Why would you give this skill a direct buff? It already sees play. :\ is for Raine, etc. 10:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- More e-management options in terms of bar compression; and I inherently dislike non-attributed skills --Falconeye 06:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Why do you think it needs to be improved at all? It's already very good. is for Raine, etc. 09:05, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Im not making it stronger, im giving it Essence Strike-like energy-management tied to Inspiration line usable at 0-14 ranks. --Falconeye 02:36, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- Why do you think it needs to be improved at all? It's already very good. is for Raine, etc. 09:05, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- (Reset indent) Neither skill is broken. But you're making a skill that's already very good (it drifts in and out of the meta) even better; why? That's like buffing... well, Empathic Removal. is for Raine, etc. 03:04, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- I came upon this particular version after spending hours comparing it with all other hex-removal skills/elite skills; many elite had an secondary/utility effect in addition to removal and some none-elites were comparable after years of re-balancing/power creeping. None with option of energy buy-back as a reward, and its appropriate for Inspiration Magic line. The energy gain/recharge time scales with Essence Strike/Glowing Gaze. Its now PvE-only, will that do? So the suggestion for Empathic Removal's healing bonus to scale with Divine Favor/Healing Prayers (instead of 50 health) is bad as well? --Falconeye 18:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- It depends on the scaling: if it scaled from, say, 10...50, then it'd be fine. But making it scale from, say, 50-100 (to give primary monks an incentive to run it!) would be bad.
- You say that "Giving it energy gain keeps it in line with other inspiration skiils", but it's not an inspiration skill. You put it in inspiration.
- There's a subtext here that non-attribute skills are bad for the game, and it's true. Attributes are a control mechanism; good skills without that are inherently broken (not overpowered, but broken). By moving a no-att skill into an att and then adding a scaling functionality, you're doing nothing to address that: the skill with 0 spec is just as good as it was without an attribute. Moving it to Inspiration and then giving it a scaling like Life Sheath's, on the other hand, gives the skill some requirement to be good. is for Raine, etc. 19:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Also, if it's going to cost 0 energy every time you cast it, why give it an energy cost at all? Make it a signet. 5 energy to remove 2 hexes every 8 seconds is already good. You don't need to give every single character in the game "bar compression." There's a reason you only get 8 slots. ~Shard 20:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- I came upon this particular version after spending hours comparing it with all other hex-removal skills/elite skills; many elite had an secondary/utility effect in addition to removal and some none-elites were comparable after years of re-balancing/power creeping. None with option of energy buy-back as a reward, and its appropriate for Inspiration Magic line. The energy gain/recharge time scales with Essence Strike/Glowing Gaze. Its now PvE-only, will that do? So the suggestion for Empathic Removal's healing bonus to scale with Divine Favor/Healing Prayers (instead of 50 health) is bad as well? --Falconeye 18:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)