Feedback talk:User/Jette/Reexamine Tolkano, again
As with the other feedback page I saw you make, please clean this suggestion page up if you want it to be read. Huge letters, bold, bad paragraphing, odd colors and blinking will not get anyone to take you seriously, if they even finish reading your suggestion.
That said, I do wholeheartedly agree with you. Everything that uses Zcoins currently is so overpriced I try not even to remember it exists. Additionally, I also felt the pain when they introduced these PvP-centric skins and I lamented it greatly. --Emkyooess 00:17, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. The requirement to buy a bunch of junk first before you can buy what you want simply makes no sense. The fancier skins can be made a little bit more expensive, but should be available upfront. After all, a level 7 can buy Obsidian armor if he wants to (not easy, but possible). And yes, these should be available to PvE's also. The zcoin price justifies it. Rose Of Kali 17:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- I also agree that the "tiered" reward system of buying endless skins you don't want is absolutely silly, but I thought the whole point of this was to give PvP characters a means of earning these fancy skins without going outside their comfort zone. I can live with that. However, as an owner of all 4 PvE campaigns, I think I've earned the right to spend my hard-earned Zaishen coins to get equivalent rewards a PvP player can enjoy. What's good for the goose... Xiaquin 19:42, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Another idea[edit]
I hope this doesn't sound like spam, but I also talked about PvP rewards and one workaround that could be introduced so PvP rewards act if they were unlocked without recoding the equipment panel. Still doesn't address the high price or being limited to PvP characters (but I don't care about that, I have a lot and everybody should save one slot for a reusable pvp one) but it's a start? Feedback:User/Previously_Unsigned/PvP_Rewards/Skins_Unlocking_Workaround Previously Unsigned. 22:20, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, that too. :) Rose Of Kali 22:27, 13 November 2009 (UTC)