Feedback talk:User/Nathe/Reclaiming Ascalon
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
i strongly support the charr having taken ascalon back from the humans. in the ecology of the charr it is revealed that in all the chaos of the khan-ur being assassinated the humans dashed in and seized those lands from the charr and named them ascalon. eventually they build the wall, and even later they made cities north of the wall. a lot of people say the charr are "invading" ascalon, but in reality they are taking back their own lands. so i say let them keep it, though they do plan to dominate everything eventually, but i think ascalon should stay with them.Akbaroth 07:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- No. Ascalonians have been fighting to get back what they lost, and they'll continue to fight until they do. If the Charr couldn't hold on to what they claim were their lands when the humans first came, that's their fault. They've been driven back before, twice. Once when the humans first came, and then again just after the Searing, before the start of Prophecies, when the Charr are back behind the wall again after having reached Kryta and Orr. It can be done again. --Nathe 18:02, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- 1st Ascalon Liberators regiment anyone? --Boro
19:10, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- 1st Ascalon Liberators regiment anyone? --Boro
- The Charr lost the southern half of of the lands East of the Shiverpeaks a thousand years or more before the start of Prophecies. After such a length of time, they really have no right to it as far as I'm concerned. The Charr are still villains, even in GW2, abet a lesser of evils when compared to the Dragons.--Will Greyhawk 22:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- By that same token humans have lost Ascalon to the Charr for more than two hundred years. Why should they have any right to it after such a length of time?--Copper Legray 19:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- It's been only a fifth as long as how long the Charr had lost it - still within just a few generations of the oldest of GW2's living human population. So there's still living memory of the place. The same can't be said of the Charr, who had lost Ascalon a full thousand years before taking it back. Two centuries isn't long enough to put it beyond the memories of the people who once inhabited it. And you forget, humanity has pushed the Charr back before. They once got as far as Kryta after the Searing, but humanity pushed them back behind the wall, because that's where they are by the time Prophecies begins. --Nathe 13:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Go check out the Ebonhawk article. your answer lies there...75.136.139.55 02:44, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ebonhawke alone isn't enough. Humanity must be allowed to reclaim some of what they lost. They need to be allowed to have more of a presence in Ascalon than just one fortress.
Nathe 19:40, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ebonhawke alone isn't enough. Humanity must be allowed to reclaim some of what they lost. They need to be allowed to have more of a presence in Ascalon than just one fortress.
- Go check out the Ebonhawk article. your answer lies there...75.136.139.55 02:44, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- It's been only a fifth as long as how long the Charr had lost it - still within just a few generations of the oldest of GW2's living human population. So there's still living memory of the place. The same can't be said of the Charr, who had lost Ascalon a full thousand years before taking it back. Two centuries isn't long enough to put it beyond the memories of the people who once inhabited it. And you forget, humanity has pushed the Charr back before. They once got as far as Kryta after the Searing, but humanity pushed them back behind the wall, because that's where they are by the time Prophecies begins. --Nathe 13:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- By that same token humans have lost Ascalon to the Charr for more than two hundred years. Why should they have any right to it after such a length of time?--Copper Legray 19:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- The Charr lost the southern half of of the lands East of the Shiverpeaks a thousand years or more before the start of Prophecies. After such a length of time, they really have no right to it as far as I'm concerned. The Charr are still villains, even in GW2, abet a lesser of evils when compared to the Dragons.--Will Greyhawk 22:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
