Feedback talk:User/Sanna/Asura Gate @ Battle Isles
From Guild Wars Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
I don't see how it can be added there. It wouldn't go good with the Eye Of The North story arc. Nor would it help any either as for each other Campaign, there's a quest that you have to do to get to Eye Of The North in the first place. There's no Pve Quests in Battle Isles, except those you get from those Zashien guys. Other than that, I don't see how this could work. Ariyen 07:08, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- I wouldn't imagine it would be too difficult for them to add the icon to one of the islands near the Guild Hall after you've gained access to the Eye of the North expansion via any one of the campaigns. Probably a number of possibilities but I don't see them doing it. ~~000.00.00.00~~ 01:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- God forbid ANet do anything that makes it's users expend less energy in order to play this new and exciting game. LA-> EoTN, KC->EoTN, Kam->Eotn all make no sense timeline wise, so why not just say "hey, let's do something nice for those who own EoTN and don't want to load through two screens when they could load into EoTN through one? Moo Kitty 01:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- I back this one up; it's a pain in the ass having to go to one of the capitals to be able to go to Boreal Station. Not to mention that if you don't go to Lion's Arch, you then have to load Boreal, and then possibly load any other EotN outpost. --
Large 22:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, how would you all 'propose' that the Battle Isles fits into the story of the Destroyers and Asurians and Dwarves? As the Asura Gates are used in Part of a story, not like the ship that takes you to Lion's Arch, Kamadan, and Kaingeng Center. Also from LA to boreal then to an outpost? I can get to EoTN directly from LA as EoTN shares same Main Map as Prophecies. ♥ Ariyen ♀ 01:11, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- I guess they can always say the Asura travelled to the Battle Isles and created a gate; just like they must have done below Kaineng and below Kamadan. Even though you get teleported to the Depths of Tyria, not taking into consideration you can get from Cantha, Tyria or Elona, I always assumed the gate where you find Vekk and Ogden is in the continent you access it from. Now, what I'm saying is that from LA there is no problem, but if you are in Cantha or Elona yo have to load Boreal and then whatever other outpost you want to go to. -- Large 14:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- I guess they can always say the Asura travelled to the Battle Isles and created a gate; just like they must have done below Kaineng and below Kamadan. Even though you get teleported to the Depths of Tyria, not taking into consideration you can get from Cantha, Tyria or Elona, I always assumed the gate where you find Vekk and Ogden is in the continent you access it from. Now, what I'm saying is that from LA there is no problem, but if you are in Cantha or Elona yo have to load Boreal and then whatever other outpost you want to go to. --
- Okay, how would you all 'propose' that the Battle Isles fits into the story of the Destroyers and Asurians and Dwarves? As the Asura Gates are used in Part of a story, not like the ship that takes you to Lion's Arch, Kamadan, and Kaingeng Center. Also from LA to boreal then to an outpost? I can get to EoTN directly from LA as EoTN shares same Main Map as Prophecies. ♥ Ariyen ♀ 01:11, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- I back this one up; it's a pain in the ass having to go to one of the capitals to be able to go to Boreal Station. Not to mention that if you don't go to Lion's Arch, you then have to load Boreal, and then possibly load any other EotN outpost. --
- God forbid ANet do anything that makes it's users expend less energy in order to play this new and exciting game. LA-> EoTN, KC->EoTN, Kam->Eotn all make no sense timeline wise, so why not just say "hey, let's do something nice for those who own EoTN and don't want to load through two screens when they could load into EoTN through one? Moo Kitty 01:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
storywise the latter remark would do just fine, I'd just like a portal to prevent me from having to teleport multiple times, of which once through a laggy capital, just to reach wherever I want to be ~ Sanna 16:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- i agree with this idea but i would rather them just improve map travel. i mean going from the realm of torment to anywhere is rather a bitch.-
Zesbeer 01:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
